%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T13:13:52-04:00
2021-06-11T13:13:51-04:00
2021-06-11T13:13:52-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
02101611
uuid:f0979a99-799b-4901-8804-1f8e18ce31a7
uuid:27f0ab7b-db76-40c8-ba61-54502c0727bb
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[32 0 R 33 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(02101611)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/civili\
an/HTML%20Word/02101611.html)Tj
49.38 0 Td
([6/11/2021 1:13:51 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 759.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 758.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 669.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 668.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 668.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 668.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 735.75 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(Claims Case Nos. 02101611 through)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(02101635)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(It is a settled rule of statutory construction that the interpretation o\
f a statutory provision, )Tj
35.825 0 Td
(as expressed in implementing)Tj
-35.825 -1.125 Td
(regulations by those charged with the )Tj
15.218 0 Td
(execution of the statute, is to be sustained and is deemed to be within \
an agency's)Tj
-15.218 -1.125 Td
(statutory authority and consistent with congressional intent unless show\
n to )Tj
30.496 0 Td
(be arbitrary or contrary to the statutory)Tj
-30.496 -1.125 Td
(purpose.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Twenty-five retired officers appeal the Defense Finance and Accounting S\
ervice's \(DFA)Tj
T*
(situation for retired members, including these officers, working as civi\
lian employees for the FAA became different)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(from that of retired members who were )Tj
15.966 0 Td
(employed by other Federal agencies. )Tj
14.939 0 Td
(It is their position that Section 5532 was)Tj
-30.905 -1.375 Td
(repealed as to FAA employees by Section 347 of Public Law 104-50.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 349.2637 401.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 349.2637 400.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 363.0698 396.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Section )Tj
3.5 0 Td
(347 provided in part that:)Tj
-32.422 -2.125 Td
("\(a\) . . . notwithstanding the provisions of title 5, United States Co\
de, and other Federal personnel laws, the)Tj
T*
(Administrator of the Federal Aviation )Tj
15.413 0 Td
(Administration shall develop and implement . . . a personnel management \
system)Tj
-15.413 -1.125 Td
(for the Federal Aviation Administration that addresses the unique demand\
s on )Tj
31.521 0 Td
(the agency's workforce. )Tj
9.731 0 Td
(Such a new)Tj
-41.252 -1.125 Td
(system shall, at a minimum, provide for greater flexibility in the hirin\
g, training, compensation, and location of)Tj
T*
(personnel.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("\(b\) The provisions of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to\
the newer personnel management system developed)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(and implemented pursuant to subsection \(a\), with the exception of . . \
. [\247 5532 not specified].")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("\(c\) This section shall take effect on April 1, 1996.")Tj
T*
(DFAS notes that the claimants seek recovery of the Section 5532 deductio\
ns based on )Tj
34.659 0 Td
(their interpretation of Section)Tj
-34.659 -1.125 Td
(347\(b\) )Tj
(of Public Law 104-50, a matter )Tj
15.663 0 Td
(within the special competency of the FAA. )Tj
17.44 0 Td
(DFAS deferred to the FAA)Tj
-33.103 -1.125 Td
(regulations promulgated in the wake of Public Law 104-50, regulations wh\
ich )Tj
31.493 0 Td
(anticipated the general continuation of)Tj
-31.493 -1.125 Td
(the Section 5532 deductions but with the waiver authority noted below. )Tj
28.828 0 Td
(DFAS states that it had initially received copies)Tj
-28.828 -1.125 Td
(of a Notification of Personnel Action \(Standard Form 50\) or equivalent\
for each claimant authorizing the Section 5532)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(deductions, but it did not receive notice )Tj
16.051 0 Td
(of any waiver. )Tj
(DFAS points to Chapter II, Section 3 of the )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
23.663 0 Td
(FAA Personnel)Tj
-39.714 -1.125 Td
(Management System-Compensation)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
14.358 0 Td
( regulation, under which the authority of the )Tj
17.912 0 Td
(Director of the Office of Personnel)Tj
-32.27 -1.125 Td
(Management \(OPM\) in Section 5532\(g\) to waive \(in whole or part\) ap\
plication of the offsets to specific individuals was)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(vested in the Administrator from April 1, 1996, until September 30, 1999\
.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 370.9492 120.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 370.9492 120 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 384.7554 116.25 Tm
( )Tj
(As a secondary issue, DFAS found that)Tj
-30.73 -1.125 Td
(FAA could not retroactively amend its )Tj
15.663 0 Td
(regulations to remove the general applicability of the Section 5532 rest\
rictions)Tj
-15.663 -1.125 Td
(because rights are fixed when a regulation is properly promulgated.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Counsel for the claimants does not dispute that the FAA regulations purp\
ort to continue the offsets mandated by Section)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(5532, but he contends that these regulations are improper. Counsel for t\
he claimants counters that neither the Secretary)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(6S˩F+)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j@E^& [N@;/fR#D[^燐nH`vzfݥ~r[ڽNا.eVAO}*vs3%oIϻtv=L~tA5wtrw+qgM[uzB?WsVWiΞr#~Fu|L;tzVsNZ֮~k]h{+&u
yޒgj9YO'cxxxx"Q?tptp%`^{
+r Gr4:\a W+:udC_/|ς,E0p,B+bȹ"tptptptptXd5g[yöI0:§' {
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅HS,ww5XPn
%DM
JMXbÊ`AQa/.vW1E/97w3ww9zA_i_1r
ZW OWp6د;0hF) vFL*@o}tdXģ3 F|ECyѱ Yk]x9flx]t`5ilXB"p-DŽF&q7vBIlq#4͗xN L@Z?!JႂB!%h
|3j!/k@ `ay v?3l}[1/EC;95hѨq*OIzy˺f[l6m۵ϿS.]u4G^Ͽ0ˠ7wa!a0<<"2jDQcbnj7~B'%LωS2=eY͘9E,ZV\:{u7loڜn۾#w{۟_pÅG+>^rgΞ;_.^|5q`e*VU{hUȋh%Q͡5tްz,Hh#BYB0O8!<^FFJUV$՞/J#
KCDiT,]sTPSgWՕatb&Bku66JV0mK#N!7r9@9U#/[]r|P.C].PSEFƶNqg-bgqY,-=,-A5^jd+@QQl'o
)9d:**Ȃv`!L-eB
8U<==_JZ/"%KtKz)Q:JTgs Ѥh2?ppi=sFrP2l9R:H(!|UҖs Ee9ZzY֨mhO[]
J2..nWW,0 7 O徳knongnkncܬ3!r@%%t FJi)GmM&_1g550jMnF4<3T̆%BaC7l00140xN-RrȢ<*rްg98)^j:p
a W>5g//bg;,er2GYpq
>3"gjm}#ϻ:ݹTu3Oa <6zp4i:,Jxsa)BKa+x a-lP`8C&D@)D 842#̇p.A4<
`$X1
cax ?B