%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T13:14:08-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:07-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:08-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
07030509
uuid:b593640f-01f4-4d20-8eec-29442c740ae3
uuid:3cad1df1-7f77-47cb-9db9-985c20c5bd73
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(07030509)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/civili\
an/HTML%20Word/07030509.html)Tj
49.38 0 Td
([6/11/2021 1:14:08 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 14, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([REDACTED])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 07030509)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Waiver of a debt under 5 U.S.C. 5584 is not appropriate when an employee\
knows or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.353 0 Td
(should be aware that she was)Tj
-34.353 -1.125 Td
(receiving pay to which she was not entitled.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(An employee of the United States Air Force requests reconsideration of t\
he February 5,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.24 0 Td
(2007, appeal decision of the)Tj
-35.24 -1.125 Td
(Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in DOHA Claim)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(No. 07011104, in which DOHA denied the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(employee's application that the government waive)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.285 0 Td
(collection of an indebtedness she owes due to overpayment of salary.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
1.232 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(Due to a reduction in force \(RIF\), the employee accepted a position as\
a medical records)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.625 0 Td
(technician GS 4, step 5,)Tj
-35.625 -1.125 Td
(effective September 28, 2003. )Tj
12.273 0 Td
(Initially she was advised that she was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.247 0 Td
(entitled to retain her grade before the RIF \(GS 5,)Tj
-27.52 -1.125 Td
(step 1\) for two years. )Tj
(In September 2003, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.301 0 Td
(annual salary with locality adjustment for a GS 5, step 1, was $25,697, \
and)Tj
-18.301 -1.125 Td
(the annual salary with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.053 0 Td
(locality adjustment for a GS 4, step 5 was $26,028. )Tj
20.691 0 Td
(Due to administrative error, the employee's)Tj
-29.744 -1.125 Td
(annual salary was erroneously established as $25,697 instead of $26,028,\
causing an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.02 0 Td
(underpayment of $102.40 during)Tj
-34.02 -1.125 Td
(the period September 21, 2003, through January 10, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The record shows that in January 2004, the employee was advised by Notif\
ication of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.13 0 Td
(Personnel Action \(SF 50\) that she)Tj
-34.13 -1.125 Td
(was not entitled to receive a retention allowance. )Tj
19.797 0 Td
(As a result,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the employee's annual salary with locality adjustments)Tj
-19.797 -1.125 Td
(should have been established as $27,044)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.469 0 Td
(\(GS 4, step 5\). )Tj
(Due to administrative error, the SF 50 that terminated the pay)Tj
-16.469 -1.125 Td
(retention)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.804 0 Td
(erroneously also established her annual salary with locality adjustment \
as that of a GS 4, step 10. )Tj
39.019 0 Td
(It initially)Tj
-42.823 -1.125 Td
(established the annual salary at $30,437, and within two months increase\
d it to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.743 0 Td
($31,020, the amount on the salary table)Tj
-31.743 -1.125 Td
(for a GS 4, step 10. )Tj
(However, this error was not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(discovered until June 2006, and the employee's total overpayment by)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(that time amounted to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.998 0 Td
($8,404.80 \(after crediting her with $102.40 that she was underpaid in 2\
003\).)Tj
-8.998 -2.125 Td
(In denying her request for reconsideration, our adjudicators concluded t\
hat the employee)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.737 0 Td
(had to know that the)Tj
-35.737 -1.125 Td
(government made a mistake when in light of the RIF and no entitlement to\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.104 0 Td
(retained pay, her annual salary with locality)Tj
-30.104 -1.125 Td
(adjustment suddenly spiked by approximately $5,000)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.636 0 Td
(per year.)Tj
-21.636 -2.125 Td
(The member's argument for reconsideration is as follows: She was reinsta\
ted into Federal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.031 0 Td
(service and hired in a term)Tj
-36.031 -1.125 Td
(position in February 2003. )Tj
10.86 0 Td
(At that time she thought that she would be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.192 0 Td
(hired as GS 5, step 5 \(annual salary with locality)Tj
-28.052 -1.125 Td
(adjustment $29,122\), and that the higher step)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.302 0 Td
(was justified based on her prior federal and civilian experience. )Tj
25.628 0 Td
(However,)Tj
-43.93 -1.125 Td
(when the employee)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.025 0 Td
(received her first paycheck, she realized that her salary was establishe\
d as a GS 5, step 1. )Tj
35.875 0 Td
(The)Tj
-43.9 -1.125 Td
(subsequent SF 50 confirmed that her salary was at step 1. )Tj
23.217 0 Td
(Because she had nothing in writing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.331 0 Td
(guaranteeing a step 5, the)Tj
-37.548 -1.125 Td
(employee did not pursue this issue. )Tj
14.304 0 Td
(She was upset when she was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(notified of the RIF and downgrade, and questions)Tj
-14.304 -1.125 Td
(whether she received proper notice. )Tj
14.493 0 Td
(She)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(explains that when she received her first paycheck in September 2003, sh\
e "saw)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(Y2ioӌ)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p fQѬ,d57FCEPTE#7Ⅸ5x!*}̈+jM20=jߧ~&ABdZ
/WXBccRN^nTC_ ) }]Vc~1%$~@BJNcB>n4,6Fv;ȳ ]r̘FY<>a_;8O]a52">ED HR2B}JyH%,k$
;`LMzbx5G7j3ގ )V5p?ѣ@!Kh5ל/bPʬӻ{xz_~@+)$T
{Ifo7Kxj_۴m}:wk{W?Y}狾Q1*6.>aCK>bdףF;n7&M゚:mfgɜ;oY/Aβy+VZƼv]ziCaMlݶ}]-WA.=Rv'Oę_x WZתC.
4}5RK-I3YRtZz[ȟQTy*?rcvΠĠ!Aʃi˃R)AJWGWT&(۔RbQ+O!0ܐa17<10N14.45iLl6MmSwS)>DbTjTOGWP&tu:K-X-U+nXDXǰaaa aC5Ol6;?6{{{'vgMlյOkk!TGYYbOi1jiP)R'NJRzߑ1tyY'@}BE!|*lmt9CrBڿLW{oq~p<ڽTiYY&E;7c^\uV~__o_(?[BzFy'y.ԋՠHw d.Gfba|0C@x00H܋j<
l1_!C9qq
'P 8ӨD<>lD$# CaH|ThX|G&z2!vS-"
I%vP6-%ppR-\ZNyOnNI+h%9մ̴Q
THE6fB[.Ih;=M>T|q?^*zTf>*t!
؈MԐ0R#jLALG7-R@F2Q:FǩNPSB;4U:K<[ԄR33x&ٜs8<x!g"ΖCy1/^9sy9q>W6kCx-^x#oͼ6m6ɻx7\>ȇ0.|s9
>ɧ4WjkZ)C?$keYfY'e7]3|ȗ2_la+_*7ɷ6#mÏ"]tW磫u8sslcHY&E@@ {bcI4w&M'q2! H]`Aԭ,L&3@`C9qp4q,ѥ\M7ܒ:܊[sp>.\p9
?զ\4e\kM|Nsǹs9NST9NS::SDA
<