%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T13:14:07-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:06-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:07-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
07021501
uuid:1a0a59c5-c971-4aac-a7d0-290d638b28b6
uuid:d5ab7d89-e91c-4d20-8852-7ec5096fb329
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(07021501)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/civili\
an/HTML%20Word/07021501.html)Tj
49.38 0 Td
([6/11/2021 1:14:06 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 26, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 07021501)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.822 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD)Tj
-1.237 -2.125 Td
(RECONSIDERATION DECISION)Tj
-16.585 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(When an employee is aware or should be aware that she is receiving payme\
nts in excess)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.543 0 Td
(of her entitlements, she does)Tj
-35.543 -1.125 Td
(not acquire title to the excess amounts and has a duty to hold them)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.827 0 Td
(for eventual repayment.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-26.827 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The employee requests reconsideration of the Defense Office of Hearings \
and Appeals)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.931 0 Td
(\(DOHA\) decision in DOHA)Tj
-34.931 -1.125 Td
(Claim No. 07012214, dated January 30, 2007, which allowed in part)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.634 0 Td
(the employee's application for waiver of erroneous)Tj
-27.634 -1.125 Td
(payments of salary.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.517 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(On December 17, 2002, the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency \(DAR\
PA\),)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.934 0 Td
(Arlington, Virginia, approved a)Tj
-33.934 -1.125 Td
(retention allowance for the employee. )Tj
15.382 0 Td
(The employee)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.942 0 Td
(subsequently received the allowance. )Tj
15.133 0 Td
(On October 4, 2004, the)Tj
-36.457 -1.125 Td
(employee accepted a new position)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.967 0 Td
(with the Missile Defense Agency \(MDA\) in Albuquerque, New Mexico. )Tj
29.271 0 Td
(As a result,)Tj
-43.238 -1.125 Td
(she was no)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(longer entitled to receive the retention allowance. )Tj
24.685 0 Td
(However, due to an administrative error, she)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.077 0 Td
(erroneously)Tj
-42.762 -1.125 Td
(continued to receive this allowance from October 4, 2004, through Januar\
y 7, 2006,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.741 0 Td
(causing an overpayment of)Tj
-33.741 -1.125 Td
($16,938.40.)Tj
T*
(In the DOHA appeal decision the adjudicator found that the employee acce\
pted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.043 0 Td
(overpayments of retention allowance up)Tj
-32.043 -1.125 Td
(until October 15, 2005, in good faith. )Tj
15.165 0 Td
(Therefore, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.913 0 Td
(adjudicator waived this portion of the overpayment, \($13,842.40\))Tj
-21.078 -1.125 Td
(and it is not at issue in this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.889 0 Td
(request for reconsideration. )Tj
11.218 0 Td
(However, the adjudicator denied waiver of the overpayment in)Tj
-22.106 -1.125 Td
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(amount of $3,096.00 which arose during the period October 16, 2005, thro\
ugh January 7, 2006,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.937 0 Td
(because the)Tj
-39.937 -1.125 Td
(employee should have questioned her entitlement to receive the retention\
allowance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.793 0 Td
(one year after accepting her new)Tj
-33.793 -1.125 Td
(position with MDA. )Tj
(In her request for reconsideration, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.633 0 Td
(employee states that she was advised at the time of her)Tj
-23.633 -1.125 Td
(interview with MDA that her position was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.192 0 Td
(a "hard-to-fill position," and therefore, she had no reason to question \
the)Tj
-17.192 -1.125 Td
(continuation of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.804 0 Td
(retention allowance after receiving it for one year. )Tj
20.295 0 Td
(She states that giving bonuses is a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.86 0 Td
(management)Tj
-41.959 -1.125 Td
(prerogative and not normally discussed with the employee in advance. )Tj
28.408 0 Td
(Since her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.999 0 Td
(performance appraisals indicated that)Tj
-32.407 -1.125 Td
(she was performing at reasonably high levels at MDA, she)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.688 0 Td
(states that the continuation of her retention allowance)Tj
-23.688 -1.125 Td
(seemed in concert with her performance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.326 0 Td
(ratings.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.58 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(Under 5 U.S.C. \247 5584, we have the authority to waive collection of e\
rroneous)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.714 0 Td
(overpayments of pay and allowances if)Tj
-31.714 -1.125 Td
(collection would be against equity and good conscience)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.549 0 Td
(and not in the best interests of the United States, provided there)Tj
-22.549 -1.125 Td
(is no indication of fraud,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.109 0 Td
(misrepresentation, fault or lack of good faith on the part of the employ\
ee. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
29.574 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DoD Instruction)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(X C0,J0l;')
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\Pj0+$%CԒX}WJHhٙa=ugmFWN>c|mgdq-.Qh
K
v..d3
lbҫd:sk[BhjᒌE2aBWܿFmHJ1poҨ1֮D,|RLrį /t4
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅H,]ĊT4Xc
%/1"*(*Q4Q0"(bGcbNJbAQaòbwX,}s朹s 4d }|-,".<>k]C? p1!A-[h]?