%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T13:14:17-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:16-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:17-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97062629
uuid:99d0d37b-12f2-4edf-9916-94afb002ce3b
uuid:f7e5974b-ae20-4833-8c39-cb606fb269ae
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[27 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97062629)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/civili\
an/HTML%20Word/97062629.html)Tj
49.38 0 Td
([6/11/2021 1:14:16 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 759.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 758.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 675.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 675 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 674.2503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 675 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(DATE: July 17, 1997)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 97062629)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(An employee who knows or should know that she received an erroneous paym\
ent of salary is )Tj
37.602 0 Td
(obliged to return that)Tj
-37.602 -1.125 Td
(amount, or set aside an equivalent amount for refund to the government w\
hen )Tj
31.324 0 Td
(the error is corrected.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-31.324 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(, )Tj
(a civilian employee of the Department of the Army, appeals the decision \
of the Defense Office of )Tj
39.763 0 Td
(Hearings and)Tj
-39.763 -1.375 Td
(Appeals \(DOHA\) which allowed the waiver of only $1,644 of the $2,740 e\
rroneously )Tj
34.52 0 Td
(overpaid to her as salary.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 550.5215 479.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 550.5215 478.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 449.25 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(In its administrative report, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service\
\(DFAS\) - Denver Center, )Tj
39.821 0 Td
(reports that the)Tj
-39.821 -1.125 Td
(employee was erroneously paid $2,740 in basic salary during the period J\
uly 1, )Tj
31.909 0 Td
(1995, through August 5, 1995.)Tj
-31.909 -1.125 Td
(Apparently this resulted when First United States Army at Fort )Tj
25.441 0 Td
(eade, Maryland downsized its civilian work force and)Tj
-25.441 -1.125 Td
(the employee was transferred on paper to )Tj
16.743 0 Td
(another Army command. )Tj
10.275 0 Td
(The record indicates that the employee received a)Tj
-27.018 -1.125 Td
(duplicate overpayment )Tj
9.385 0 Td
(for 40 regular hours \($548\) for the Pay Period Ending \(PPE\) July 8, \
1995, and 80 regular hours)Tj
-9.385 -1.125 Td
(\($1,096\) for each of the PPEs July 22, 1995, and August 5, 1995. )Tj
(While there was some question )Tj
39.077 0 Td
(as to whether the)Tj
-39.077 -1.125 Td
(employee had received leave and earnings statements \(LES\) for the firs\
t two pay )Tj
32.516 0 Td
(periods involved, she did receive an)Tj
-32.516 -1.125 Td
(LES from two separate offices each showing she had received a )Tj
25.795 0 Td
(regular base salary payment of $1,096 for the PPE)Tj
-25.795 -1.125 Td
(August 5, 1995. )Tj
(Our Office agreed with DFAS )Tj
(that the employee should have questioned this duplication.)Tj
T*
(The employee contends that the finding that she should have questioned h\
er entitlement to the )Tj
37.851 0 Td
(duplicate salary payment)Tj
-37.851 -1.125 Td
("is an untrue statement." )Tj
10.064 0 Td
(She argues that she did question the accuracy of )Tj
19.466 0 Td
(her pay voucher as soon as she received it. )Tj
17.271 0 Td
(She)Tj
-46.801 -1.125 Td
(thought it was reasonable to expect a duplicate )Tj
18.938 0 Td
(payment because it looked to her like a way to pay for 80 hours annual)Tj
-18.938 -1.125 Td
(leave erroneously deducted )Tj
11.189 0 Td
(from her leave account by the pay office of the command she had just lef\
t. )Tj
29.989 0 Td
(The record)Tj
-41.178 -1.125 Td
(indicates that )Tj
5.554 0 Td
(the employee had over 30 years of Federal service.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
16.352 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(Our waiver authority, 5 U.S.C. )Tj
12.582 0 Td
(5584, applies to a claim against an individual arising out of the )Tj
25.411 0 Td
(erroneous payment of)Tj
-37.993 -1.125 Td
(pay or allowances to an employee, the collection of which would be again\
st )Tj
30.546 0 Td
(equity and good conscience and not in the)Tj
-30.546 -1.125 Td
(best interest of the United States. )Tj
13.469 0 Td
(The statute further )Tj
7.636 0 Td
(provides that waiver cannot be granted if there is any indication of)Tj
-21.105 -1.125 Td
(fraud, fault, misrepresentation, or )Tj
13.634 0 Td
(lack of good faith on the part of the person having an interest in obtai\
ning the waiver.)Tj
-13.634 -1.125 Td
(See)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 130.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 33.3262 131.25 Tm
( 5 U.S.C. )Tj
(5584\(b\)\(1\) and the Standards for Waiver, 4 C.F.R. 91.5\(b\). )Tj
27.801 0 Td
(The standard employed to determine )Tj
14.912 0 Td
(whether a)Tj
-44.157 -1.125 Td
(person was at fault in accepting an overpayment is whether, under the pa\
rticular )Tj
32.266 0 Td
(circumstances involved, a reasonable)Tj
-32.266 -1.125 Td
(person should have known or suspected that he was receiving )Tj
24.882 0 Td
(more than his entitlement. )Tj
10.692 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 442.8906 103.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 460.2168 104.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Petty Officer Ricky)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 463.2168 103.5 cm
0 0 m
93.973 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 90.75 Tm
(Johnson, USN)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 90 cm
0 0 m
69.346 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 85.3457 90.75 Tm
(, B-256417, July 22, 1994; )Tj
(Captain Douglas K. Basiger, USAF)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 216.6836 90 cm
0 0 m
171.322 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 388.0059 90.75 Tm
(, B-256600, July 14, 1994; )Tj
(Bryan E.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 519.3437 90 cm
0 0 m
42.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 77.25 Tm
(Lippman)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 76.5 cm
0 0 m
43.324 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 59.3242 77.25 Tm
(, B-201816, July )Tj
(8, 1981.)Tj
-3.61 -2.125 Td
(There is no indication of fraud, misrepresentation or lack of good faith\
by the employee )Tj
35.322 0 Td
(with respect )Tj
5.109 0 Td
(to the debt, but)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(DFAS and our adjudicators reasonably concluded that the employee was at \
least )Tj
32.379 0 Td
(partially at fault because she should)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(T$;_R"W)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|{|LkΜ5D!93U^7WRn$DAPiDD5D^ŸhCIf7zhZ{u~^ xa"$Deqr*$2:)*ݤ_
rGRn
ԫ c'I11}]ցq1Q~13Pk'~@"%WT ]ǭEGISoG6OJMnQI1oeۗxa#S8TƓG$kF6z)ITn#P_R.b5$k4zI'I{-_xq= gFmtFt:j6Z?_=
"X4Vq"%:Wo~7hبqPb0BBհ74mfZlv6m?бS.vQ?G>|ѷ_|9``d;8nH|BbaGLz1c}3~BINN)SM1s9s_pQ%K<7oUט_/m((Xi۶عk8xG;~gΖ/]
ZuhEa"T0@
zI4i4SʓJϴ^^rKsy3(>(!HPi38-xyOJtUz*}JKeU)VXy8
Y'EƵ&M&_S)Ф4u7EbB4!>!FFT}TX
Uj:QMW3jAݬV)zU1sXdXtXlXBذi-l6;1?mٝOk:T