%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T13:14:17-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:17-04:00
2021-06-11T13:14:17-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97082535
uuid:70ceb9a2-4552-4e76-86a5-a5552d29afe1
uuid:86171ef2-f8f0-47f4-a01e-dd4995fad64b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97082535)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/civili\
an/HTML%20Word/97082535.html)Tj
49.38 0 Td
([6/11/2021 1:14:17 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(November 4, 1997)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In Re: [Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claims Case No. 97082535)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(An employee who erroneously was overpaid because she had been "upgraded"\
to GS-4, step 4 in violation of applicable)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(regulations was told by a supervisor)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.664 0 Td
(that he would request that her "upgrade" be granted as an exception to t\
he)Tj
-14.664 -1.125 Td
(regulations. She was informed three months later that no exception had b\
een granted,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.351 0 Td
(but then received a Personnel)Tj
-34.351 -1.125 Td
(Action \(Standard Form 50\) stating that it had been granted. Under thes\
e circumstances, the employee reasonably may)Tj
T*
(not have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.666 0 Td
(known that she was being overpaid, and waiver of the balance of her debt\
is granted.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-3.666 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(This is in response to an appeal of Claim Settlement, DOHA Claim No. 970\
16158, August 19, 1997, which allowed in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(part, and denied in part, waiver of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.272 0 Td
(claimant's debt.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.245 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
([Redacted] is a civilian employee of the Department of the Air Force, Ma\
cDill Air Force Base, Florida. At the time she)Tj
T*
(was hired, her salary was based on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.578 0 Td
(last position she held as a general schedule employee. She was initially\
paid as a)Tj
-15.578 -1.125 Td
(GS-3, step 5, because she had been a GS-5, step 1, in her previous gover\
nment)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.742 0 Td
(job. By letter dated July 24, 1995, she)Tj
-31.742 -1.125 Td
(requested that her pay documents be reviewed because she believed that s\
he was being underpaid and that she qualified)Tj
T*
(for a higher step grade, based on her previous position. The Air Force c\
omplied with her request. By letter dated August)Tj
T*
(10, 1995, which she received a week)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.967 0 Td
(later on August 17, she was informed that her pay had been incorrectly c\
alculated,)Tj
-14.967 -1.125 Td
(and that she had been overpaid. Because she had had more than a two-year\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.183 0 Td
(break in service, her pay should have been)Tj
-30.183 -1.125 Td
(set at a)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(GS-3, step 1, in accordance with MacDill Air Force Base Pay Setting Poli\
cy at the time she was hired. The employee)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(was sent the applicable regulations and an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.078 0 Td
(Application for Waiver of Erroneous Payments \(AF Form 1782\) at that ti\
me.)Tj
-17.078 -1.125 Td
(She subsequently received a Personnel Action, Standard Form \(SF\) 50, d\
ated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.133 0 Td
(August 18, 1997, which indicated that she)Tj
-31.133 -1.125 Td
(had been granted a GS-4, step 4, rating due to her duties and responsibi\
lities. Her first Leave and Earnings Statement)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
47.015 0 Td
(in)Tj
-47.015 -1.125 Td
(September reflects the information on the SF 50.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The employee submitted an Application for Waiver dated August 28, 1995, \
which does not list the amount of the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(overpayments nor the dates applicable. A)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.8 0 Td
(memorandum from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service \(DFAS\),)Tj
-16.8 -1.125 Td
(dated August 7, 1996, sets out the erroneous payments by pay period, thr\
ough)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.439 0 Td
(October 28, 1995. It states that the)Tj
-31.439 -1.375 Td
(employee was notified of her debt on April 18, 1996, and that she submit\
ted a request for waiver on May 13, 1996.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 568.2051 213.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 568.2051 213 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 183.75 Tm
(The investigative report provided by DFAS recommended waiver of $2,868.0\
0, which represents the amount received)Tj
T*
(from January 23, 1995 though August 5,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1996. Since the employee was not notified of the erroneous payments unti\
l)Tj
T*
(August 17, 1995. DFAS reasoned that the employee accepted the erroneous)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.52 0 Td
(payments made before that date in good)Tj
-30.52 -1.125 Td
(faith, believing she was entitled to them. With regard to pay received a\
fter August 17, however, DFAS noted that the)Tj
T*
(employee was aware that she was being overpaid and should reasonably hav\
e set aside the overpayment for refund to)Tj
T*
(the government. In our Claims Settlement)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.024 0 Td
(Certificate, we waived $2,868.00 and denied waiver of the $391.20,)Tj
-17.024 -1.125 Td
(representing erroneous payments made after the employee was notified. Th\
e employee has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.514 0 Td
(appealed that determination,)Tj
-36.514 -1.125 Td
(requesting waiver of the entire amount of the overpayment. She has provi\
ded a copy of the SF 50 she received in)Tj
T*
(August and other)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(documents.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.906 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(jcX&_)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxfQѬ,W4&ݸ1F!*($^=#(!~43ۣ.fH}ޫ炙 `$Dy}*$:6%&% eǎH3uP:o: M(?@a
Hah<0>&Qc^!@,Z$)i-CbcwۦČJm9@ I x!\8TmtOn$ ` $)Q22B}J9H%,k$-4sƨ ri_{r7$j
@O(X`(Z=2^>|jթ[~p!h
W#jԸMҬywZz۴}E~a:vs~uG?y}}~cul\|SI:lx7#F=fƧO8irwO:mfϙ;o2/YY+WZf:
7Ilݶ}]ݷCX'O.=s\_(x\nި m`4BCƓKcIaRi.MfJ9GCn.!9 R~
٥KлBCBBCW)!JgKUR);"\(Oggjm22<53N60.27iLl5L&) 3P5ԆjT}WT j:U.Ps6u_-RKs5~DdD IC7۬hb7]&;[#;?gUW;Üitp,r45}4R%2jLzߑ{14y