%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:12:23-04:00
2021-06-11T15:12:22-04:00
2021-06-11T15:12:23-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
05083105
uuid:7d5148db-9095-4a10-996f-b3bb4d572932
uuid:7093b683-dc47-4d21-9706-48366ccce828
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(05083105)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/05083105.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:12:22 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(October 3, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(Claims Case No. )Tj
7 0 Td
(05083105)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.823 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD)Tj
-1.237 -2.125 Td
(RECONSIDERATION DECISION)Tj
-16.585 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Under the Uniformed Services Former Spouse Protection Act, state courts \
are permitted to treat disposable retired pay)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(as marital property. )Tj
8.053 0 Td
(The increase in a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.052 0 Td
(member's monthly retired pay resulting from its restoration under 10 U.S\
.C. \247)Tj
-15.104 -1.125 Td
(1414 is subject to a state court divorce decree, and under the decree di\
sposable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.738 0 Td
(retired pay is properly being distributed)Tj
-31.738 -1.125 Td
(to the member's former wife at the percentage directed by the decree.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The )Tj
(member requests reconsideration of the August 18, 2005, Appeal Decision \
of the Defense Office of Hearings and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Appeals \(DOHA\) in DOHA Claim No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.915 0 Td
(05070511.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.602 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The member seeks reimbursement for the increase in his retired pay due t\
o concurrent retirement and disability)Tj
T*
(payments that have been and are being paid to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.743 0 Td
(his former wife.)Tj
-18.743 -2.125 Td
(On March 1, 1980, the member became entitled to military retired pay. Th\
e member had a service-related disability,)Tj
T*
(determined by the Department of Veterans Affairs \(VA\) to be over 50%. \
As required by statute, 38 U.S.C. \247 5305, he)Tj
T*
(waived a portion of his retired pay to obtain VA compensation. )Tj
25.549 0 Td
(On September 5,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.999 0 Td
(1991, he was divorced. )Tj
(Under the)Tj
-32.548 -1.125 Td
(divorce decree, his former wife was to receive 44.6% of his monthly disp\
osable retired pay. )Tj
36.932 0 Td
(Under the Uniformed)Tj
-36.932 -1.125 Td
(Services)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Former Spouse Protection Act \(USFSPA\), 10 U.S.C \247 1408, his former \
wife applied for direct deposit of the)Tj
T*
(44.6% of his retired pay. )Tj
10.136 0 Td
(In December 1991 her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.218 0 Td
(application was granted. )Tj
9.997 0 Td
(However, as stated in the divorce decree and)Tj
-29.351 -1.125 Td
(as set for under 10 U.S.C. \247 1408\(a\)\(4\), the portions of "disposa\
ble retired pay" paid to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.031 0 Td
(both his wife and the member)Tj
-35.031 -1.375 Td
(were reduced by the amount waived for VA compensation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 299.5703 230.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 299.5703 229.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 200.25 Tm
(In 2004 Congress enacted new legislation, 10 U.S.C. \247 1414, allowing \
a gradual restoration of retired pay currently)Tj
T*
(being deducted from retirees' accounts due)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.34 0 Td
(to concurrent receipt of VA compensation. )Tj
17.355 0 Td
(This restoration of retired pay is)Tj
-34.695 -1.375 Td
(commonly known as concurrent retirement and disability payments \(CRDP\)\
,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 384.9238 174.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 384.9238 174 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 398.73 170.25 Tm
( and is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(applicable to all retirees who)Tj
-31.894 -1.125 Td
(have a qualifying service-connected disability \(a service-connected dis\
ability that is rated not less than 50% disabling by)Tj
T*
(the VA\). )Tj
(As a qualified retiree under 10 U.S.C. \247 1414, restoration of the mem\
ber's )Tj
33.561 0 Td
(waived retired pay began in January)Tj
-33.561 -1.125 Td
(2004. )Tj
(Under USFSPA and the divorce decree,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.69 0 Td
(his wife was paid 44.6% of the increased amount of retired pay.)Tj
-18.69 -2.125 Td
(The member protested these increases in the amounts of his retired pay b\
eing paid to his former wife. The Defense)Tj
T*
(Finance and Accounting Service \(DFAS\) denied the member's claim findin\
g that the member's receipt of CRDP was a)Tj
T*
(restoration of his retired pay and subject to division under the USFSPA.\
On appeal, our Office agreed with DFAS and)Tj
T*
(denied the member's claim. In the member's request for reconsideration, \
he states that 10 U.S.C. \247 1414 is not)Tj
T*
(retroactive and does not apply to a court order dated 1991. Specifically\
, he cites the legislation's effective date and states)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
( =RB$4LYER)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0yCJia?tH#DxŸEQl ')cI&a05N
8`P^9ɤt-o7^$ ʵs|q
|zW"yC髬W2o`n,
izikӣLuey7X9{ٲ߰,1wEq2?Ut6Kk 469cΈ[X1+bͬ{Ⓓ$>2O'3s(QA"srs`aO O`O O`O O80Ss_M}5{jAsh?N#7G>mn!Q/k1Ms~2V#~ |
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|y|ϼ>3$XBLҢ\ʽuEYRH=X{$>#V2=C^И臡?*~@?C&&PI轀['Nt/V
}bdJRl~,
#cvL2Q$E?iTLf&B
$i!C//ۈUZ)_5eH fq> gNmtF t:EYzD/
,^EѸNI+NUۧ@
6jP5&M/-Zzuwkۮ5;ungOzG_g}?8hp$2tX\|BI#GNjؔq'|=qRjoi32g̚5{yd/\K/_r5o6n*\e;vڽgoǎ(;y
=WyKrbVuZt0T0f"JR4CZ.K/^rK3y-Xz,NM䘻Zڼm^6Of&$Ɔ7I׳VTeUk\FV
ZNUmBݭݬmmM&k#,,6=MWr"2ee%b-s\cn\'Vgv+v["ьG*WDX|M"_9x>Y'@zBE!|"lmt9K"SfeZ_?V pͣkIƟ\h[D*~:ï>Wע?
qVK>x픰VlwB&bVXiD^|<3