%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13-04:00
2021-06-11T15:12:59-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
06013001
uuid:2addf1eb-7095-460d-979a-f11e4c4fc70f
uuid:c000c328-d26c-432f-9a4a-216499501b77
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(06013001)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/06013001.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:12:59 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(March 13, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. )Tj
7 0 Td
(06013001)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.823 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD)Tj
-1.237 -2.125 Td
(RECONSIDERATION DECISION)Tj
-16.585 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(In a conflict between enforcement of a state divorce decree and a federa\
l military)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.705 0 Td
(entitlement outside of military retired)Tj
-32.705 -1.125 Td
(pay, federal law pre-empts state law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(A former spouse \(hereinafter "claimant"\) of a deceased member requests\
reconsideration)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.773 0 Td
(of the November 30, 2005,)Tj
-35.773 -1.125 Td
(Appeal Decision of the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.99 0 Td
(\(DOHA\), )Tj
4.055 0 Td
(DOHA Claims Case No. 05033105, )Tj
(in which)Tj
-30.045 -1.125 Td
(our Office upheld the Defense Finance)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.771 0 Td
(and Accounting Service's \(DFAS\) determination to disallow her claim fo\
r the)Tj
-15.771 -1.125 Td
(Voluntary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Separation Incentive \(VSI\) payments still owed to the deceased member.\
)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.517 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(At the time the member separated from the Navy under the VSI program, he\
was married)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.96 0 Td
(to the claimant, and they had)Tj
-35.96 -1.125 Td
(two sons. )Tj
(The member subsequently designated the claimant as the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.077 0 Td
(100 percent beneficiary of VSI payments still owed)Tj
-27.077 -1.125 Td
(him in the event of his death. )Tj
11.886 0 Td
(The member)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.331 0 Td
(made this designation using DFAS-CL Form 1900/2, Voluntary Separation)Tj
-17.217 -1.125 Td
(Incentive \(VSI\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Beneficiary Designation. )Tj
16.744 0 Td
(In 1999 the member and the claimant divorced, and the separation and)Tj
-16.744 -1.125 Td
(property division agreement incorporated into the final divorce decree i\
ssued by a family court in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.181 0 Td
(the State of Delaware)Tj
-39.181 -1.375 Td
(specifically divided the VSI payments.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 202.2871 270.75 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 202.2871 270 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 240.75 Tm
(The member remarried and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.161 0 Td
(purportedly drafted a handwritten document dated November 15, 2001, desi\
gnating his new)Tj
-11.161 -1.125 Td
(wife)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(as 50 percent beneficiary and each of his sons as 25 percent beneficiari\
es of the payments still)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.874 0 Td
(owed him in the)Tj
-39.874 -1.125 Td
(event of his death. )Tj
7.581 0 Td
(DFAS has reported to have received this document in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.689 0 Td
(November 2001. )Tj
(The member died in March)Tj
-29.27 -1.125 Td
(2004 whereupon his sons discovered his 2001)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(designation. )Tj
23.747 0 Td
(DFAS's Retired and Annuity Pay unit accepted the 2001)Tj
-23.747 -1.125 Td
(designation and advised)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.859 0 Td
(the member's sons and his wife of the specifics of the designation.)Tj
-9.859 -2.125 Td
(Claimant contested the 2001 designation on the basis that it failed to c\
omply with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.883 0 Td
(relevant regulations and was contrary)Tj
-32.883 -1.125 Td
(to the divorce decree. )Tj
8.856 0 Td
(DFAS's Assistant General Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(advised payment should be made in accordance with the 2001)Tj
-8.856 -1.125 Td
(designation. )Tj
5.11 0 Td
(Claimant appealed to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.747 0 Td
(our Office. )Tj
(Our Office affirmed DFAS's disallowance of her claim. )Tj
27.115 0 Td
(She now requests)Tj
-40.973 -1.125 Td
(reconsideration. )Tj
6.664 0 Td
(First, she states that her divorce decree is legally binding and should \
be honored)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.297 0 Td
(by DFAS. )Tj
4.307 0 Td
(She states)Tj
-43.268 -1.125 Td
(that the member was aware of his obligation to share his VSI payments)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.743 0 Td
(when he signed the divorce agreement.)Tj
-28.743 -1.125 Td
(Therefore, if DFAS accepts the 2001 change of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.187 0 Td
(beneficiaries, she argues the member could only have made changes to)Tj
-19.187 -1.125 Td
(his 50 percent share of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.774 0 Td
(VSI payments. )Tj
(Second, in the alternative, she argues if DFAS does not comply with the)Tj
-10.774 -1.125 Td
(divorce)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.249 0 Td
(decree, the handwritten, faxed beneficiary changes should not be honored\
and the 1993)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.126 0 Td
(designation should be)Tj
-38.375 -1.125 Td
(upheld, awarding her 100 percent of the VSI payments.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(-;F)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|{|LkΜ5DBH$'EPzԳT{[[HR("!xAxEAPb\4$3w.|{:g}?{}@ 0 "{}֢U~9bv_ ČN1u9P*o<(mX@a;J'!h88.:a@_
,zऔ=o,ǭDKnG6K(s'â*S
xR8TƓG%kF5z7)Dn-P_R.5$k4zI'I{_xq= g<эZ댴#tfm'j
\ O(P`(Z52n^u}Рa`Ah
UjҴޢ;Z6m۽">hߡc]>=?~_orh|?h𐄡IÆ'9*cƎK̈́i&;%N9cf֬sΛ {KlyΊܕVYμ~CFi-[m߱s={/>p-=vDST.^뵪@D:a"95M_f)D%ҤiR:#=zi{-T9C%O1;uizgPBР#AeA?) SU+_*JRXSa50d3MMz@bjjzmфUSQjc5TmF$5]P+MvP-RKrzE1sXTXLX|а;|sٹ1g=aood~yZۡim#đHs8k\;K\
4FM?M*EJR%*:H-Ogs
u\n NA%A`O
V(@e[)U.*הjlC@cqkNuWL/8SkN\552kNqa ST8&4V-'AvSG{{7{èڈ~sɎюI.N[s#⪵ppj*jN=j<lKjEgky6r%ErBڿLWs{ow~p<ڽiXY*E;7c^]uV~_9߾P:xN.]uūA ]|,db96`
|! N<lP$!Ðd(|XbcAV"
m={)$Ғ;jh-%pp2ZN9ri%;y'x紆:2z@y6fʧ-vځ_p2(v.MB&KȏiQ=O3h?:H0PlVjHtJ5
T_n)d #TF'Ni
PRr*,J:BzPSj۸C83y,ųyy<p6/Er(/%XKy/^Wj^ky ڡ7poMyomwNm6wn.=y~.|a>%|K\'Oi>m֡uʐŏ,ZYYzMv=,J_+|-lk\7;|{|]KtUx|tuu:?4W=ss.}mA)ҤH`OLb! Ҥ $N1$t,Җe:A'$StN:Cg,nȍ8-_Rȗ2?5Ы**ګjG^ث#usu.9 m=UOwt=CԳl~_s<=_/"X/K#'#zY{\+c F5z^Qo\כުvC?;.[Y{gIܘ9S9939 p.q~tQt1vNX={Eb?| YCp(>p811)r7܂[_|[qknsqb\Kq.Wڔ撹kp)3Wp𣑴 )w8ws=p**کq
ZS@!4rC;- !R =f_sb^rZC@BC4Bsr;>g\w(fZ@Kh
v~?a
ކ0
ށwa:~3`&A<cxxOxY<EUxoM]w bVbVc
̂2
P6:|,8/"DD$I&$"