%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:04-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:03-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:04-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
06103007
uuid:d8887713-9c1d-44b1-88e7-3a632ef7266a
uuid:3835101b-a5e6-4fc1-82f7-c4f2d1e97701
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(06103007)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/06103007.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:03 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 14, 2006)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 06103007)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.822 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD)Tj
-1.237 -2.125 Td
(RECONSIDERATION DECISION)Tj
-16.585 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(In the absence of clear error, amendments to regulations cannot be appli\
ed retroactively.)Tj
T*
(An administrative delay in revising an allowance rate does not qualify a\
s such an error.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(This is in response to a request for reconsideration of Defense Office o\
f Hearings and Appeals)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.987 0 Td
(\(DOHA\) Appeal)Tj
-37.987 -1.125 Td
(Decision, DOHA Claim No. 06071716, dated October 19, 2006, which denied)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.605 0 Td
(the member's claim for the increased cost)Tj
-31.605 -1.125 Td
(of living allowance \(COLA\) for Ashgabat,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.301 0 Td
(Turkmenistan, for the period November 18, 2001, through August 31, 2002.\
)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.216 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(During the period November 18, 2001, through August 31, 2002, the member\
was serving)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
36.327 0 Td
(in the Air Force assigned to)Tj
-36.327 -1.125 Td
(Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. )Tj
10.331 0 Td
(After completing the retail price schedule)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.882 0 Td
(\(RPS\) survey for Ashgabat, the Department of State)Tj
-27.213 -1.125 Td
(increased the COLA allowance for U.S.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.217 0 Td
(government civilian employees in Ashgabat effective November 18, 2001. )Tj
30.074 0 Td
(The)Tj
-46.291 -1.125 Td
(Per Diem, Travel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.164 0 Td
(and Transportation Allowances Committee \(Committe\) of the Department o\
f Defense did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.601 0 Td
(receive)Tj
-44.765 -1.125 Td
(the RPS survey for Ashgabat until February 2002. )Tj
20.303 0 Td
(The Committe did not complete its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.22 0 Td
(analysis of the survey until July)Tj
-34.523 -1.125 Td
(2002. )Tj
(In August 2002 the matter was submitted to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.747 0 Td
(Committee's Military Advisory Panel \(MAP\). )Tj
18.568 0 Td
(The MAP approved)Tj
-40.315 -1.125 Td
(the increased COLA for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.885 0 Td
(Department of Defense personnel in Ashgabat effective September 1, 2002.\
)Tj
30.545 0 Td
(The adjustment)Tj
-40.43 -1.125 Td
(was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(prospective only, and no member assigned to Ashgabat was entitled to rec\
eive the higher COLA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.628 0 Td
(rate until)Tj
-40.628 -1.125 Td
(September 1, 2002.)Tj
T*
(The member originally filed a claim with his finance office for the incr\
eased COLA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.821 0 Td
(effective November 18, 2001. )Tj
12.218 0 Td
(His)Tj
-46.039 -1.125 Td
(claim was submitted to the Committee, which denied it,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.579 0 Td
(relying on a Comptroller General decision which prohibited)Tj
-22.579 -1.125 Td
(retroactive payments of increased)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.716 0 Td
(COLA rates. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( 33 Comp. Gen. 505 \(1954\). )Tj
(The member subsequently filed his)Tj
-13.716 -1.125 Td
(claim with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.971 0 Td
(Defense Finance and Accounting Service \(DFAS\). )Tj
20.522 0 Td
(DFAS denied his claim on the grounds that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.554 0 Td
(the)Tj
-44.046 -1.125 Td
(increased COLA did not become effective until September 1, 2002. )Tj
27.27 0 Td
(The member appealed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.134 0 Td
(DFAS's denial of his claim to)Tj
-36.404 -1.125 Td
(our Office. )Tj
(The adjudicator found that the delay in issuing the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.993 0 Td
(revised COLA was due to administrative delay and thus)Tj
-24.993 -1.125 Td
(denied the member's claim on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.676 0 Td
(authority of 33 Comp. Gen. 505, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
13.304 0 Td
(supra)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(.)Tj
-26.98 -2.125 Td
(The member seeks reconsideration of the appeal decision. )Tj
23.408 0 Td
(He argues that the 14-month)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.636 0 Td
(delay in adjusting the COLA for)Tj
-35.043 -1.125 Td
(U.S. military members must be considered a substantial,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.801 0 Td
(unacceptable and unfair administrative delay. )Tj
18.437 0 Td
(He states that)Tj
-41.238 -1.125 Td
(there must be some remedy for the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.134 0 Td
(Committee's delay, especially since the Department of State was able to \
update the)Tj
-14.134 -1.125 Td
(COLA in a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(timely manner for the same location. )Tj
19.661 0 Td
(He estimates that he is owed approximately $6,000. )Tj
20.939 0 Td
(He)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(cites 33 Comp.)Tj
-40.601 -1.125 Td
(Gen. 505, )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(supra)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, in support of his claim.)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(i2PpV@k,i[)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0y9J!˶Cm@j1|Ne
fd5wèr.Nڰ Wνeݾz[3.L\pVˀGߜBKwmCM
G*~FvjŵO-ByjF.
WKtVVШjF;&'J2&ʇ$LTwI#U⊸"N)ter6ipܜA kc
0 SÇ
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=`CD{a-.{L_)VKlĂ{W(+vQ,O;O[o%g=sYs
P`ZWRcCZhxtX̬Ņx8Y?(Ftn]7LVk!Q;mWnaM
8/&(
q@g-(@=g>ax]%УE
)1Mxo9B>!c
@^GcEƬ*ݐqPQThYr2/REeU:(;*%?9/(9;&]=
.Rgq%K.S\y_?bUXrV^fu֫ߠaM>iڬyZϿh:~;KxDdTn{ݻOL~4p!Ce#7zq 'L4yig̜5{Λ yK.KYb*^f6nڼek;vڽ'm:|'N:3gϝp\;e^(6%Uwa8)=y!既hVSQCԱj:I=>T_o~Ohg|kt4:?Ìa7/\Kee%͒mleMN.)67[1ͰUU"O S1Y,oUfˌ5xs9\h67;]yڼb
l<040<0*g`*#TmbM6%5%oUsr|\u]A&fy9yyg&YbUWr