%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:12-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:11-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:12-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
07022009
uuid:0515266a-02ee-41c4-a931-ee0227501b5d
uuid:46587060-41bc-4254-8a3f-7d29a511e5cf
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(07022009)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/07022009.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:11 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 644.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 643.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 642.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 643.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: )Tj
(February 28, 2007)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([REDACTED])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 07022009)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.822 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD)Tj
-1.237 -2.125 Td
(RECONSIDERATION DECISION)Tj
-16.585 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(When the member retired, he was not married. )Tj
18.881 0 Td
(He subsequently married and filed an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.217 0 Td
(application within one year of his)Tj
-34.099 -1.125 Td
(marriage for enrollment in the Survivor's Benefit Plan \(SBP\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.537 0 Td
(for his new spouse. )Tj
(SBP premiums should have then been)Tj
-24.537 -1.125 Td
(deducted from his retired pay, but)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.801 0 Td
(they were not. )Tj
5.942 0 Td
(If the member had died during the period when premiums were not)Tj
-19.744 -1.125 Td
(being)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(deducted, his wife would have become eligible for an SBP annuity. )Tj
29.66 0 Td
(Since the member received)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.106 0 Td
(the benefit of SBP)Tj
-40.766 -1.125 Td
(coverage, waiver is not appropriate.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(A retired member of the United States Army requests reconsideration of t\
he January 30,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.461 0 Td
(2007, decision of the Defense)Tj
-35.461 -1.125 Td
(Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in DOHA Claim No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(07011604. )Tj
(In that decision, DOHA denied the member's)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(application for a waiver of an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.05 0 Td
(indebtedness of $9,605.84 that he incurred when Survivor's Benefit Plan \
\(SBP\) premiums)Tj
-12.05 -1.125 Td
(were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not withheld from his retired pay.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.517 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record shows that the member retired from the United States Army on \
July 19, 2000. )Tj
35.992 0 Td
(The member was entitled to)Tj
-35.992 -1.125 Td
(receive retired pay. )Tj
7.939 0 Td
(Since he was not married, no SBP election was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.107 0 Td
(posted to his retirement account. )Tj
13.274 0 Td
(On May 3, 2002,)Tj
-40.321 -1.125 Td
(the member was married. )Tj
10.413 0 Td
(He requested SBP)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(coverage for his spouse. )Tj
(As a result, SBP premiums should have been)Tj
-10.413 -1.125 Td
(withheld from his retired)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.22 0 Td
(pay effective June 1, 2003. )Tj
11.024 0 Td
(Due to an administrative error, no SBP premiums were withheld)Tj
-21.244 -1.125 Td
(from his account. )Tj
7.22 0 Td
(As a result, the member was overpaid $9,605.84 from June 1, 2003, throug\
h)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.716 0 Td
(July 30, 2006.)Tj
-37.937 -2.125 Td
(Our Office determined that it would not be against equity and good consc\
ience to collect)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.739 0 Td
(the overpayment from the)Tj
-35.739 -1.125 Td
(member since the member's spouse would have been covered under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.337 0 Td
(SBP had he died during the period that no SBP)Tj
-27.337 -1.125 Td
(premiums were deducted from his retired pay. )Tj
18.716 0 Td
(In)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(his request for reconsideration, the member attempts to distinguish his)Tj
-18.716 -1.125 Td
(situation from the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.36 0 Td
(Comptroller General decision, B-253900, Nov. 4, 1993. )Tj
22.607 0 Td
(He states that unlike the facts in)Tj
-29.967 -2.125 Td
(B-253900, there was no documentation of eligibility for SBP coverage in \
his case. )Tj
33.188 0 Td
(He states that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.637 0 Td
(despite his timely filing)Tj
-38.825 -1.125 Td
(of the SBP application, he was repeatedly denied coverage based on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.962 0 Td
(fact that it was not open season. )Tj
12.997 0 Td
(Therefore, the)Tj
-41.959 -1.125 Td
(member argues that the debt should be waived)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.828 0 Td
(because he is not convinced that his spouse would have been protected or\
)Tj
-18.828 -1.125 Td
(even known to inquire)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.22 0 Td
(about SBP coverage had he died.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.685 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(We have the authority under 10 U.S.C. \247 2774 to waive claims of the U\
nited States)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.521 0 Td
(against members or former members)Tj
-33.521 -1.125 Td
(of the Uniformed Services if collection would be against)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.91 0 Td
(equity and good conscience and not in the best interest of the)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(b;8Qvw6N)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxfQѬ,d57F(APTQ4"9x߷""^x+32Gl#zIĨvs(ȏNI6$u P7M.?PC|IvZ(q@A_ۡ
zԞ7o #iw#'F&5RaxTbLIyB*?$idg(U\Ib4"
IHn#P_Rb5$k4zI'I{-:@xq> gNmtF t:j6Z?_=
"X2Vq"%:Wo~7hبqPb0BBհ4mvhmkv{otةsvQ?{^??~ѯ9pPd;d谸#FuʘԱ3abڤNIӦgdΘ5+{,]yK,[b5k6l,ܴymwܵ{}Qr3gϕ._덊@D:a"95M?F)D-ҤiL:'=zi{-AT9C%+gܘ4v3(.(>XPi38-xiOJtSz)}~ Ke])R.*LqFyCƁ)L|&o)hRLMMozL1!
Uz>@mwp5A\uAݪUEiz])KXdXtXlX|؈i-b6ͻ1?mGg5kj8BɎ4GڵĞ*@cJR4NJRB[G!#Ly\&?ep.B_ߩ)!(IUJŠP"^sLRv*R<;l6N02k9_s4
~"j9eZN5ZN1aqSdh`o67_o%8g:ٻڻ/V 7HqLrqrO\ ^)0W-fnN7[5P]V}q[D`[p_+Z?[]il:ddP|Q_r"ps͜@j#+DhUѩME5dmdfy`gZe)UMn.ΖPb]sG8Qi؝mD3V