f:q6.!QkO]y7J9Ԫp#mp X揭N$>D~S(LIʒ1ϷelG١D╍d;{s]$c T?
u7
%L,\ J6NyVޤ: Ӱ&bn(#}~}{j!5Vk~'=.Z3B67UpfԖ=-#Fz5w\ uދR~_?+<.-}Eu CQrJYX *.-e7Ϯi_ i_~Q"
*QWyUBuGw%Q/9zt7oQΠ(O (; P?)o#:o[K/ܠ| 跤LE 01;Hm1:1f+Ǧ^kڱ[#`][߂,AuzV }G;n[ƅh dy n$ {w
v}}xS Kj/ ˕ C|UY+ĺ̴X5 _HL>%~_'^&UW ?n/ !HXLAB(ðB Z! @C*ZLT@mk-J+ܦ@ mZqU:v8"-PWs;%v{߷/H@ jI _x,>s3B{L qJn{ܯ_ڣOl)N^J22 AR#n%~ߎw$)1;rY<;2m3 ME㧫sKMYᙾr bo1Dǫ}DFxonҍ `-C#vhv/gƶ6>w rq+ ;کyx m2sQv&u&L)Ƹwf)sCȻyhJl.D~I틹T{έAi m7t;:sQļRX-ũ,
|mpGW+ 70J]Zoէ'>՜rЉǡ&ORoX}V?kJCh"eA[pӃouJ݊f l7Qk(_L61Yӭ UCww6qIm*z_-fAdzkZjV'ۚ&L;Ryt%I:M5_.s.k52fԚ8sO rTSz
rbR宐
v+14o|#Sy Nݯr;zݡt
W_ l/^flOs_@NMd[6^t>yB8O[ثJ)Ѷd4[)9^ӥ ]2[։:-ZO|Z1$0Nx,q$)lv'?ŬE%Zp 'qz%1c6e
ct-ѵMl~]$f1C@mπ_:9kgAQ.e PȌKYJY_sOm{;}{Y͚2uF49ӱkص T\Hyb|X"̒KP! FAGiZ'変 pNN#JІ|EVGeGP B9t-}{_+
o~ښ.Ny&jX=]w
wFފKƪNڸi?[
Nϓ
5 &U dD|~~ kr gkZ7w#V C&xWK_#={ȉTOin3F
%?2<^
C.A?_/e-rLjc'ިsW ~|E~r#_=Oޮk
fOS˕Im*Nog7U`H ?0@5xy;}[b S ꦧyNxCKaM68C:/뇆G`\Mvn6
+ápC̎nAY_/}_/F`ʞmۦa6V#<Blqn8if!PampAn2^R!xsx>tA]i7︉AgU^uq
|Tq<ߪY3]I7U1m&}ݯniHR<~~ISrnHc=>,%[ fh 7o'ۣP>s3} kГ859t=<뒝K] _qǶbU,P~0FTE|,3pB}SfKV+㼦
z`.IR]'^qɹeci<ؓ[j%g*q4 }?9jo1djrvrGr48X!MvGvح<&/inaܺ94IDӼZiF%2Flh*IĽHYc gXG/s 5wd;c_hWHZ
A20)VD&&侮C>
>7FeMBOH0Rc8 =}xٌ?PRyA qϊRo]mb\/GkƊź?w2Y xayEpDq ?y8~=KjV0dfl|S=Ug5μηh0 H_CW5ك!!lS
6P_;s/xWn ݤg+N~?2kwi *1`"X'g'fV^jfL6홚s3wܜq;?q?ʸtm@53M}aԟ~ ==_{{P1Iͽ4$T'#Mm3^gU4߀7xߨ6t^ֽmD`Zx ܌N>q?٢ FO3FoqK-<>
M4 ߢ}ݤǨ[u4:x/*?PO]xd3.p$r21 &[".J?C n %ntP%pJCMFlF"?8lT~H ʧIM5T͕BfٻYY\ >|ۅ̻hd &w=&oa6>]tvO Ƒo|[oߥx{bX,bX,bX,bX,bX,bX,bX,bX,bX,π#GT_+)WyZF-䥾 ȽFrRs>{$Gb9@>IMNI0fq$ M*cUߠ1=ʷrXO2I\T+V
YUisTr
-w㨩FK5ߪ(@@[ZῆJJJE72o): 3դ>_d >CE1tQHcNY39*ze]y,\y{tmO?tcE3iE~^Ի}HVi/@\'x;%O8{ md$cme 9~Op046*s@4{+QSt'!K7Ii/qN jG-"YG8wyrǨJ>-5Hlbw;d}**~s֣BAٗR8
q_':n_s&JaoR'!Ay\Md/uO ǻ460&f'# `0+e@а 6<_E\ }`;H
v,:;%+ _~
K 9i /|>-> B~;=?e@Z T&7묑Y;(#l4a*974[dH\rwhgu7m
'^cO Kz
z&ـ@f`f~VhZ%`ai 5s2 #gXk6٨r<+F@ f*f*f*n+ "CX&u3 xV 2}V"VX7]B%t,nW.䌞hlpni`ɹQZXȫU
g2:c].*0`R& [P 4 @".,mB?&mb$G 5\4 ك{S>eJ@xFR H}S\9x>qwO3* d[l }b}0"$`bS.r9e,_=g)KPU% \)ȝ]ޯS\~N] k*=-أ^M ģbGHQe3?Hnp /
ZJłus\
zTzbwR%y<+j+YtG5\%<)@p:7uߠ PkAEg35i.%ݐ#.Z zFg1ZKYƍZ1 щ],q]3 =e8A|p N"k,ݤH~RL;!]!IӰoX'AYn
,2]&G̦VJ
gJ{pj5@}{1-5&D ~ˑ/Ot I 7 I^8|zO:%jz̵/cng 7DopMNjf ($MLEIJ9֘7`ǵvro}ɊוLӼyyyY3Ws-9%۲ĒeX2-&b!܌{i"$$6E0H\
(?*ϩ'ުxEi}<VZ 42l,|-I
GTF9;ۦe =N~Rߩ'3U+Õ+*s [ꏡi.}YQgE~UL}k
S0jվ6 R5SJD)rE nPn R(H!MHZXS}0N8GoHZdz^L&tD Tt+5]&%`-$M#)z4O
x^*xb x͓B/~d2 ) V
Bɬ k6tePAbSv E#UU%*F
~}L+j ~ ~ J5@p MFU1 7VVKԽg^o% ؕJs
m (-[UG
RǷgwC*sJ%ur 7;;м3%oR=iS<@X5הZKV۩ \Vj9U sJNͥrpFɨTfIR .VQoz$pߓ?ʡܖ%o Cߒ̅J / v\|V7[6BR "Dڬ6XXXQ;[`~k/=/F>GCuqC,.&9+bDR p\wڈG)B$LnZIir y'WO@<9%` fi+n ~&Xv>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96070219)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/96070219.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:20 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 382.5 591.75 383.25 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(annuity.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729 Tm
(Signed: Michael D. Hipple)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(_____________________________)Tj
T*
(Michael D. Hipple)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Claims Appeals Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Joyce N. Maguire)Tj
T*
(______________________________)Tj
T*
(Joyce N. Maguire)Tj
T*
(Member, Claims Appeals Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jean E. Smallin)Tj
T*
(______________________________)Tj
T*
(Jean Smallin)Tj
T*
(Member, Claims Appeals Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(During the applicable time period, this section was 4513 of the Californ\
ia Civil Code.)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
(But)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 396.75 cm
0 0 m
17.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 45.3379 397.5 Tm
( )Tj
(see)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 48.3379 396.75 cm
0 0 m
15.322 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 63.6602 397.5 Tm
( )Tj
(Munson v. United States)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 66.6602 396.75 cm
0 0 m
118.664 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 185.3242 397.5 Tm
(, 30 Fed. Cl. 830 \(1994\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
37 0 obj
[39 0 R]
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96070219)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/96070219.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:20 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(provides in pertinent part that a decree declaring a marriage )Tj
24.1 0 Td
(dissolved shall specify the date on which the decree)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(becomes finally effective for the purposes of )Tj
18.132 0 Td
(terminating the marriage relationship of the parties.)Tj
-18.132 -2.125 Td
(Documents in the file indicate that despite the fact that the judgment w\
as not entered until October )Tj
39.682 0 Td
(1991, marital status)Tj
-39.682 -1.125 Td
(ended May 31, 1991. )Tj
(The Notice of Entry of Judgment, dated October 21, )Tj
29.854 0 Td
(1991, specifies that the effective date of)Tj
-29.854 -1.125 Td
(termination of marital status is May 31, 1991. )Tj
18.553 0 Td
(It further )Tj
(states that neither party may remarry until the effective date of)Tj
-18.553 -1.125 Td
(the termination of marital status as )Tj
14.107 0 Td
(shown, which is May 31, 1991.)Tj
-14.107 -2.125 Td
(The Orders and Attachment to the Judgment of Dissolution, which were app\
arently signed and dated )Tj
40.545 0 Td
(on October 10,)Tj
-40.545 -1.125 Td
(1991, indicate that the hearing on October 8 was for the court to review\
the issue of )Tj
33.656 0 Td
(spousal support. )Tj
(A stipulation order)Tj
-33.656 -1.125 Td
(dated October 8 states that spousal support was to be paid for )Tj
24.772 0 Td
(October, then suspended until the hearing on December 3,)Tj
-24.772 -1.125 Td
(1991. )Tj
(In addition, that document )Tj
13.303 0 Td
(indicates that spousal support was to begin on June 1, 1991, until such \
time as the)Tj
-13.303 -1.125 Td
(claimant died, or )Tj
6.998 0 Td
(remarried or until further order of the court, implying that the claiman\
t was free to remarry.)Tj
-6.998 -2.125 Td
(Even after the dissolution became final, the case was continued to Decem\
ber 3, 1991, February 10, )Tj
39.82 0 Td
(1992, )Tj
(March 9,)Tj
-39.82 -1.125 Td
(1992, April 14, 1992, May 12, 1992 and May 21, 1992, at which time a dif\
ferent )Tj
32.55 0 Td
(stipulation order settling spousal)Tj
-32.55 -1.125 Td
(support was signed. )Tj
(Thus the fact that the court reviewed spousal )Tj
26.327 0 Td
(support in October of 1991 is not inconsistent with the)Tj
-26.327 -1.125 Td
(conclusion that the effective date of )Tj
14.549 0 Td
(termination of the marital status was May 31, 1991. )Tj
20.913 0 Td
(In addition, all of the)Tj
-35.462 -1.125 Td
(documents filed and )Tj
8.359 0 Td
(entered into judgment in October indicate that the marital status ended \
in May 1991.)Tj
-8.359 -2.125 Td
(In addition, this office contacted the Superior Court of San Diego, Fami\
ly Law Division. )Tj
35.743 0 Td
(We were )Tj
(informally advised)Tj
-35.743 -1.125 Td
(that the date the marital status of the parties ended was May 31, 1991. \
)Tj
28.214 0 Td
(Thus it )Tj
(appears that although the divorce may not)Tj
-28.214 -1.125 Td
(have been final until judgment was entered on October )Tj
22.187 0 Td
(11, 1991, the marital status of the parties ended, and the parties)Tj
-22.187 -1.125 Td
(were free to remarry in May.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Accordingly, although the claimant argues that she was married at the ti\
me the member elected )Tj
38.319 0 Td
(participation, based on)Tj
-38.319 -1.125 Td
(the record before us, we cannot conclude that the claimant was married t\
o the )Tj
31.237 0 Td
(member at the time the member retired)Tj
-31.237 -1.125 Td
(and elected to participate in SBP. )Tj
13.58 0 Td
(Thus, we cannot allow )Tj
9.303 0 Td
(payment of an SBP annuity on that basis.)Tj
-22.883 -2.125 Td
(However, we note that the Comptroller General repeatedly expressed the v\
iew that doubts )Tj
36.266 0 Td
(concerning the validity of a)Tj
-36.266 -1.125 Td
(marriage may properly be resolved by a final judgment of a court of )Tj
27.462 0 Td
(competent jurisdiction. )Tj
9.47 0 Td
(He further held that doubts)Tj
-36.933 -1.125 Td
(may be resolved to the satisfaction of the )Tj
16.662 0 Td
(accounting officers of the government if a court of competent jurisdicti\
on)Tj
-16.662 -1.125 Td
(renders a judgment )Tj
7.914 0 Td
(declaring the marriage valid. )Tj
11.745 0 Td
(Lieutenant Commander Joseph Eugene Smith, USN \(Retired\))Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 251.9043 331.5 cm
0 0 m
296.273 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 318.75 Tm
(\(Deceased\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 318 cm
0 0 m
53.959 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 69.959 318.75 Tm
(, B-217743, July 15, 1985. )Tj
(We agree. )Tj
15.219 0 Td
(If a court of competent jurisdiction were to )Tj
17.438 0 Td
(render a judgment that the)Tj
-37.154 -1.125 Td
(parties were validly married, the Board would not question the status of\
)Tj
28.91 0 Td
(the marriage.)Tj
-28.91 -2.125 Td
(The claimant also questions whether she is eligible for an SBP annuity b\
ased on the fact that she has )Tj
40.407 0 Td
(at least one child)Tj
-40.407 -1.125 Td
(that is issue from her marriage to the member. )Tj
18.716 0 Td
(We note that the child in question )Tj
13.747 0 Td
(appears to be the issue of her first)Tj
-32.463 -1.125 Td
(marriage to the member, rather than issue of the marriage which )Tj
25.934 0 Td
(took place in 1993. )Tj
7.915 0 Td
(It is our view that since the couple)Tj
-33.849 -1.125 Td
(was legally divorced and returned to the )Tj
16.3 0 Td
(status of unmarried persons under California law, then legally remarried\
, the)Tj
-16.3 -1.125 Td
(child born of the first )Tj
8.748 0 Td
(marriage of the parties does not qualify as "issue of that marriage" for\
purposes of qualifying the)Tj
-8.748 -1.125 Td
(claimant for an SBP annuity.)Tj
T*
(The Comptroller General apparently never specifically addressed this iss\
ue, however, he has held )Tj
39.236 0 Td
(that a child born to the)Tj
-39.236 -1.125 Td
(two parties prior to the time they were legally married does not qualify\
as )Tj
29.658 0 Td
("issue of that marriage." )Tj
9.952 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 491.3184 172.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 508.6445 173.25 Tm
(, )Tj
(e.g.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 514.6445 172.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 531.9707 173.25 Tm
(, )Tj
(Clarence)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 537.9707 172.5 cm
0 0 m
42.639 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 156.75 Tm
(W. Braxton, USA \(Retired\)\(Deceased\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 156 cm
0 0 m
186.264 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 202.2637 156.75 Tm
(, B-189133, )Tj
(Sept. 21, 1977.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 334.5977 161.25 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 334.5977 160.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 345.9663 156.75 Tm
( In)Tj
( MacConnell v. United States)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 358.9624 156 cm
0 0 m
141.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 500.6069 156.75 Tm
(, 217 Ct. Cl. 33)Tj
-40.384 -1.125 Td
(\(1978\), a member was married in )Tj
13.579 0 Td
(1949, elected to participate in the Retired Servicemen's Family Protecti\
on Plan)Tj
-13.579 -1.125 Td
(\(RSFPP\), divorced )Tj
(in 1968, attempted to participate in SBP, and remarried in 1974. )Tj
33.689 0 Td
(The member died two months )Tj
12.248 0 Td
(after)Tj
-45.937 -1.125 Td
(the remarriage. )Tj
6.302 0 Td
(The couple had two children born of the first marriage. )Tj
22.242 0 Td
(The Claims Court held )Tj
9.388 0 Td
(that although the initial)Tj
-37.932 -1.125 Td
(marriage produced two children, there was no issue of the second marriag\
e. )Tj
30.489 0 Td
(We are unable to conclude that a child of)Tj
-30.489 -1.125 Td
(the couple, born to them during the first marriage, is )Tj
21.161 0 Td
("issue" of the second marriage.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.605 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(Accordingly, we are unable to conclude that the claimant was an "eligibl\
e widow" for purposes of )Tj
39.443 0 Td
(receiving an SBP)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[334.0 159.0 345.0 170.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj
[42 0 R]
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96070219)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/96070219.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:20 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(The claimant, through )Tj
9.108 0 Td
(her attorney, has appealed the case arguing that she and the member were\
married at the time of)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(the )Tj
(member's election, and therefore, the one year restriction does not appl\
y to her. )Tj
33.362 0 Td
(She also indicates )Tj
7.415 0 Td
(that there are)Tj
-40.777 -1.125 Td
(children born during the first marriage and asks whether she therefore q\
ualifies for an )Tj
34.487 0 Td
(SBP annuity based on the "issue)Tj
-34.487 -1.125 Td
(of that marriage" provision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.906 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(The legislative history of the SBP shows that the congressional purpose \
of the plan was to establish )Tj
40.021 0 Td
(an income)Tj
-40.021 -1.125 Td
(maintenance program for families of deceased service members. )Tj
26.016 0 Td
(To that end, a military )Tj
9.164 0 Td
(retiree may elect to provide an)Tj
-35.18 -1.125 Td
(annuity at death to an eligible beneficiary in exchange for )Tj
23.324 0 Td
(contributions to the program during his lifetime. )Tj
19.552 0 Td
(Congress)Tj
-42.876 -1.125 Td
(sought to prevent spouses who become )Tj
15.886 0 Td
(widows or widowers of SBP participants only by virtue of a short-term ma\
rriage)Tj
-15.886 -1.125 Td
(after retirement )Tj
6.44 0 Td
(from automatically receiving an annuity. )Tj
16.55 0 Td
(As a result, Congress established conditions precedent to)Tj
-22.99 -1.125 Td
(receiving an annuity.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 1450 \(a\) \(1\), directs pa\
yment of the SBP annuity to the )Tj
39.631 0 Td
("eligible widow")Tj
-39.631 -1.125 Td
(upon the death of the member. )Tj
12.468 0 Td
("Widow" is defined in pertinent part by 10 U.S.C. )Tj
20.258 0 Td
(1447\(3\) as:)Tj
-32.726 -2.125 Td
("The surviving wife of a person who, if not married to the person at the\
time he became )Tj
35.314 0 Td
(eligible for )Tj
4.665 0 Td
(retired pay--)Tj
-39.979 -2.125 Td
("\(A\) was married to him for at least one year immediately before his d\
eath or)Tj
T*
("\(B\) is the mother of issue by that marriage.")Tj
T*
(Thus, if the spouse was not married to the member at the time of initial\
election into the plan, he or )Tj
39.851 0 Td
(she must have been)Tj
-39.851 -1.125 Td
(married to the member for at least 1 year immediately before the member'\
s death )Tj
32.611 0 Td
(or be the parent of issue born of that)Tj
-32.611 -1.125 Td
(marriage in order to become an eligible widow or widower )Tj
23.825 0 Td
(beneficiary. )Tj
4.997 0 Td
(However, if a member who was married at the)Tj
-28.822 -1.125 Td
(time of retirement and initial election )Tj
15.161 0 Td
(into SBP elects coverage for that spouse, divorces that spouse and later\
remarries)Tj
-15.161 -1.125 Td
(that spouse, the )Tj
6.443 0 Td
(spouse on remarriage is exempt from the 1- year waiting period before be\
coming an eligible)Tj
-6.443 -1.125 Td
(beneficiary. )Tj
4.997 0 Td
(Colonel Arthur W. Hyland, USAF, Retired, and Major Harry R. Park, USAF, \
Retired,)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 75.9648 387 cm
0 0 m
413.279 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 489.2441 387.75 Tm
( )Tj
(B-195349, Jan. 10,)Tj
-39.437 -1.125 Td
(1980.)Tj
T*
(The issue in this case is whether or not the claimant is an eligible ben\
eficiary. )Tj
31.268 0 Td
(A petition for )Tj
5.693 0 Td
(dissolution of marriage )Tj
9.526 0 Td
(had)Tj
-46.487 -1.125 Td
(been filed and a trial had been completed at the time of the election. T\
he )Tj
29.21 0 Td
(Notice of Entry of Judgment and the Judgment)Tj
-29.21 -1.125 Td
(issued by the Superior Court of California state that )Tj
20.913 0 Td
(the marital status was terminated on May 31, 1991, even though the)Tj
-20.913 -1.125 Td
(Judgment was not filed and )Tj
11.248 0 Td
(entered until October 1991.)Tj
-11.248 -2.125 Td
(Based on these documents, GAO disallowed the claim, concluding that in O\
ctober, the Superior )Tj
38.63 0 Td
(Court of California)Tj
-38.63 -1.125 Td
(apparently exercised its power to enter the divorce decree retroactively\
\()Tj
28.93 0 Td
(nunc )Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 363.1621 268.5 cm
0 0 m
26.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 389.4883 269.25 Tm
(pro tunc)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 389.4883 268.5 cm
0 0 m
39.656 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 429.1445 269.25 Tm
( \) to May 31, 1991, pursuant to)Tj
-34.429 -1.375 Td
(California Family Code 2346.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 159.9824 257.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 159.9824 256.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 171.3511 252.75 Tm
( That section provides that )Tj
10.858 0 Td
(if the court determines that a decree of dissolution ought to)Tj
-23.804 -1.125 Td
(be granted but by mistake, negligence or )Tj
16.495 0 Td
(inadvertence, the judgment has not been signed, filed and entered, the c\
ourt)Tj
-16.495 -1.125 Td
(may cause the judgment )Tj
9.941 0 Td
(to be signed, dated, filed and entered therein as of the date when the s\
ame could have been)Tj
-9.941 -1.125 Td
(signed, )Tj
(dated, filed and entered originally. )Tj
17.133 0 Td
(If that assumption is correct, then the claimant and member )Tj
24.02 0 Td
(were divorced on)Tj
-41.153 -1.125 Td
(May 31, 1991, and the claimant does not qualify as an eligible widow for\
SBP.)Tj
T*
(The claimant argues that the court did not enter a )Tj
19.881 0 Td
(nunc pro tunc)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 254.5762 172.5 cm
0 0 m
65.982 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 320.5586 173.25 Tm
( judgment. )Tj
4.527 0 Td
(She argues that nothing )Tj
9.665 0 Td
(in the file)Tj
-39.572 -1.125 Td
(substantiates that conclusion. )Tj
11.942 0 Td
(We have found nothing in the record which affirmatively )Tj
23.131 0 Td
(indicates that the court entered a)Tj
-35.073 -1.125 Td
(nunc pro tunc)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 145.5 cm
0 0 m
65.982 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 81.9824 146.25 Tm
( judgment. )Tj
4.527 0 Td
(However, based on the record before us, )Tj
16.41 0 Td
(neither can we assume that the parties were married at)Tj
-26.436 -1.125 Td
(the time of the election.)Tj
T*
(The Comptroller General has held as a general proposition that the valid\
ity of a marriage is for )Tj
38.126 0 Td
(determination under the)Tj
-38.126 -1.125 Td
(laws of the jurisdiction where the marriage is performed. )Tj
22.992 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 291.9062 93 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 309.2324 93.75 Tm
(, )Tj
(47 Comp. )Tj
(Gen. )Tj
(286 \(1967\). )Tj
(Similarly, we look to the laws)Tj
-24.436 -1.125 Td
(of the jurisdiction where the dissolution or divorce )Tj
20.496 0 Td
(is performed.)Tj
-20.496 -2.125 Td
(California Civil Code )Tj
8.916 0 Td
(4501, in effect at the time of the dissolution, states in pertinent part\
that the )Tj
30.298 0 Td
(effect of a judgment)Tj
-39.213 -1.125 Td
(decreeing a dissolution of the marriage is to restore the parties to the\
state of )Tj
30.795 0 Td
(unmarried persons. )Tj
(Civil Code )Tj
12.526 0 Td
(4514)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[159.0 255.0 170.0 266.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
47 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-%20HTML%20Word/96070219.html)
endobj
46 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
<>
endobj
44 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 433.0 null]
endobj
45 0 obj
[16 0 R/XYZ 0 407.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 49
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003655 00000 n
0000113095 00000 n
0000003533 00000 n
0000003588 00000 n
0000003728 00000 n
0000003755 00000 n
0000112479 00000 n
0000112563 00000 n
0000112605 00000 n
0000112295 00000 n
0000004391 00000 n
0000104267 00000 n
0000095467 00000 n
0000093738 00000 n
0000003858 00000 n
0000003904 00000 n
0000003953 00000 n
0000004144 00000 n
0000004016 00000 n
0000004048 00000 n
0000004080 00000 n
0000004112 00000 n
0000004591 00000 n
0000010197 00000 n
0000010246 00000 n
0000010281 00000 n
0000010783 00000 n
0000041870 00000 n
0000042137 00000 n
0000011196 00000 n
0000011469 00000 n
0000011896 00000 n
0000042742 00000 n
0000093927 00000 n
0000095681 00000 n
0000095706 00000 n
0000103934 00000 n
0000104481 00000 n
0000104506 00000 n
0000111962 00000 n
0000112380 00000 n
0000113011 00000 n
0000113053 00000 n
0000112822 00000 n
0000112647 00000 n
0000112958 00000 n
trailer
<<3EAF177C9DE70148A1F1650C0D08277F>]>>
startxref
113265
%%EOF