%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:28-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:27-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:28-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
96112101
uuid:728ebb4b-c5fa-4859-a024-4de2d39a0ff3
uuid:3d3bcabc-73cc-4d56-8642-561d768684e2
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96112101)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/96112101.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:27 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
T*
(DATE: May 16, 1997)Tj
T*
(Claims Case No. 96112101)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(The widow of a Reserve component service member who retired in 1952 and \
who died in 1964, is )Tj
39.518 0 Td
(not entitled under)Tj
-39.518 -1.125 Td
(Section 305 of the Army and Air Force Vitilization and Retirement Equali\
zation )Tj
32.436 0 Td
(Act of 1948, or Air Force Pamphlet 30-)Tj
-32.436 -1.125 Td
(1-1 \(1964\), to receive monthly payments equal to her late )Tj
23.243 0 Td
(husband's retired pay when she reaches age 60.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-23.243 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
([Redacted] , the claimant, appeals our Settlement Certificate in DOHA Cl\
aim No. 96091003, )Tj
37.462 0 Td
(November 5, 1996. )Tj
(Our)Tj
-37.462 -1.375 Td
(settlement denied her claim for monthly benefits based on her late )Tj
26.686 0 Td
(husband's \([Redacted]\) Reserve service.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 528.3086 480.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 528.3086 480 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 450.75 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The service member retired from the United States Air Force Reserve when\
he reached the age of )Tj
39.289 0 Td
(60, effective October)Tj
-39.289 -1.125 Td
(31, 1952; he died on August 24, 1964. )Tj
15.583 0 Td
(The Defense Finance & Accounting )Tj
14.689 0 Td
(Service - Denver Center reports that it is not)Tj
-30.272 -1.125 Td
(known whether the late service member participated in )Tj
22.213 0 Td
(either the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan, 10)Tj
-22.213 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. )Tj
(1431-1446, \(RSFPP\) or its )Tj
(predecessor, the Uniform Services Contingency Option Act of 1953, ch. 39\
3, 67 Stat.)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(501. )Tj
(The )Tj
(claimant says that she waited until she turned 60 in 1992 to apply for b\
enefits on advice of Air Force )Tj
44.35 0 Td
(officials.)Tj
-44.35 -2.125 Td
(In the November 5, 1996, Settlement Certificate, this Office thoroughly \
explained the legal basis for )Tj
40.377 0 Td
(denial of any)Tj
-40.377 -1.125 Td
(benefits based on irregular military service under title 10, United Stat\
es Code. )Tj
31.436 0 Td
(We will )Tj
3.443 0 Td
(not elaborate further on that)Tj
-34.879 -1.125 Td
(discussion except to address the errors cited by the claimant in her )Tj
26.77 0 Td
(appeal.)Tj
-26.77 -2.125 Td
(Preliminarily, it is the claimant's position that by operation of law wh\
en her husband died, and upon )Tj
40.2 0 Td
(her 60th birthday in)Tj
-40.2 -1.125 Td
(1992, she should receive any retired pay he would have received if he ha\
d )Tj
29.85 0 Td
(continued to live. )Tj
7.221 0 Td
(She maintains that it was)Tj
-37.07 -1.125 Td
(not necessary for the service member to have enrolled in )Tj
22.88 0 Td
(any annuity program in order for the claimant to collect such)Tj
-22.88 -1.375 Td
(benefits. )Tj
3.666 0 Td
(The claimant characterizes )Tj
10.965 0 Td
(the service member's benefits as "old age benefits." )Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 441.1094 254.25 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 441.1094 253.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 452.478 249.75 Tm
( On appeal, the claimant)Tj
-36.373 -1.125 Td
(asserts that the )Tj
6.137 0 Td
(adjudicators committed various errors. )Tj
15.69 0 Td
(For one thing, she says that her entitlement is not based on)Tj
-21.827 -1.375 Td
(Sections 302 and 307 of the Army and Air Force Vitilization and Retireme\
nt Equalization Act of )Tj
39.046 0 Td
(1948,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 511.5508 224.25 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 511.5508 223.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 522.9194 219.75 Tm
( rather it is)Tj
-42.243 -1.125 Td
(based on the correct advice of certain Air Force officials, corroborated\
by section )Tj
32.764 0 Td
(22 of Air Force Pamphlet \(AFP\) 30-1-)Tj
-32.764 -1.125 Td
(1 \(May 1, 1964\) and Section 305 of the 1948 Act "which )Tj
23.043 0 Td
(makes old age benefits, viz. social security benefits part of the)Tj
-23.043 -1.125 Td
(sum total of retirement pay." )Tj
11.738 0 Td
(The )Tj
(claimant contends that in accordance with Section 305, old age benefits,\
or other)Tj
-11.738 -1.125 Td
(benefits received )Tj
7.052 0 Td
(on account of civilian employment, are to be included in the amount of r\
etired pay. )Tj
33.461 0 Td
(She says that)Tj
-40.513 -1.125 Td
(because old age benefits are synonymous with Social Security benefits, "\
there should not have been )Tj
40.175 0 Td
(a denial . . .)Tj
-40.175 -1.125 Td
([because] . . . such benefits are considered community property and a ri\
ght to [a] )Tj
32.488 0 Td
(surviving spouse . . ." )Tj
(Finally with)Tj
-32.488 -1.125 Td
(regard to the finding that there was no evidence that the )Tj
22.52 0 Td
(claimant's late husband participated in RSFPP or its)Tj
-22.52 -1.125 Td
(predecessor, the claimant suggests that he may )Tj
18.938 0 Td
(have been in one of those programs and contends that DFAS is trying to)Tj
-18.938 -1.125 Td
(make itself non-liable for )Tj
10.385 0 Td
(claims by destroying her late husband's pay records.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.52 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(Preliminarily, while the result in )Tj
13.22 0 Td
(McCarty v. McCarty)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 174.6367 46.5 cm
0 0 m
100.313 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 274.9492 47.25 Tm
(, 453 U.S. 210, )Tj
(101 S.Ct. 2728 \(1981\) was )Tj
(largely overturned by)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(cW %7*})
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxfQ,,d57FAPT#"㉷x ^'3:Gl#zLHYVc UHL\jlZ (ȋnHR^%o60M(@aL'!h;ac_D0i>-UʐXi &p>@aplj|.x!ӝ8Tw
OD4zIJA^^,Q/[) _5epA' A
FNvt:# r:bYzD/
,^EѸVfӫO]_?z4l8(X1M!j[M6{_[|UwѦ{-v;t.]?'ӞQgy//G⫸ %%6tG5zoƍȜĬ゚4yig̜={ys,\K/_r5o6n*ؼe;v*ܽgᄁǎ(;y8wKqbVuZ,hU0'Ơ$H=R4U.-Jϴ^ڞrs9Z$OgSnN]~~t$,,'%@ R(=J2N١(Ey@mwH5ETtu\ݨnSEjzJ=^UEu6yFxNfy\hvnloG;?;kjֶ}Z[q;25{*_QWS JQ)Kp)ʥ:(+Ogȳr uQ|. N)A%A`gW+
Mz)ZTv)%R<;n6N0Fٯ9_q1
x^sV9 NW_sKb\l2O6o1?Rpdo+8uwwW|7tqr^) W-fnN7[
PS^sQXz,N-eymn6mMilx|aor
Y'@{BE!|*lr