%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:37-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:36-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:37-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97012135
uuid:0c724bb6-b301-469e-b648-e91036d60e92
uuid:44513e01-651e-4fc5-b1b4-63efae55c7ff
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97012135)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/97012135.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:36 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
T*
(DATE: June 13, 1997)Tj
T*
(Claims Case No. 97012135)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Waiver of collection of an overpayment resulting from an agency's failur\
e to reduce the salary of a )Tj
39.691 0 Td
(rehired annuitant to)Tj
-39.691 -1.125 Td
(reflect a cost of living increase is denied where the employee generally\
alleges )Tj
31.681 0 Td
(that he had problems with his pay at)Tj
-31.681 -1.125 Td
(various times since his appointment because of his status as a )Tj
24.8 0 Td
(rehired annuitant and that he generally relied on the)Tj
-24.8 -1.125 Td
(expertise of pay officials. )Tj
10.413 0 Td
(The employee offered )Tj
9.079 0 Td
(no rebuttal to the finding that he was advised in Notifications of)Tj
-19.491 -1.125 Td
(Personnel Actions and through prior )Tj
14.803 0 Td
(experience over a 3-year period that his salary was reduced each time th\
at there)Tj
-14.803 -1.125 Td
(was a cost-of-living )Tj
8.192 0 Td
(increase, and he failed here to document the suspected error, obtain ass\
urances from agency pay)Tj
-8.192 -1.125 Td
(officials that it was not an error, and show reliance on their advice wi\
th regard to this error.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(, a civilian employee/rehired annuitant of the Department of the Air For\
ce, appeals the decision of )Tj
39.486 0 Td
(the U.S. General)Tj
-39.486 -1.125 Td
(Accounting Office \(GAO\) which disallowed his application for the waive\
r of the )Tj
32.601 0 Td
(erroneous overpayment of $1,230.80)Tj
-32.601 -1.375 Td
(of salary.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 60.6484 413.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 60.6484 412.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 72.0171 408.75 Tm
( Under Section 103\(d\) of Public Law No. 104-316, )Tj
20.635 0 Td
(110 Stat. 3826, 3828-3829, Oct. 19, 1996, Congress)Tj
-25.303 -1.125 Td
(transferred to the Director of the Office of )Tj
17.103 0 Td
(anagement & Budget \(OMB\) the Comptroller General's authority under tit\
le)Tj
-17.103 -1.125 Td
(5, United States )Tj
6.61 0 Td
(Code, Section 5584 \(5 U.S.C. )Tj
(5584\) to consider applications by Federal employees requesting that )Tj
39.659 0 Td
(the)Tj
-46.27 -1.125 Td
(government waive debts resulting from the erroneous overpayment of salar\
y and allowances. )Tj
37.46 0 Td
(The OMB Director)Tj
-37.46 -1.375 Td
(delegated this authority to the Secretary of Defense effective December \
18, )Tj
30.375 0 Td
(1996.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 407.5059 356.25 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 407.5059 355.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 418.8745 351.75 Tm
( The Defense Office of Hearings)Tj
-33.573 -1.125 Td
(and Appeals \(DOHA\) now exercises the authority )Tj
20.244 0 Td
(transferred or delegated to the Secretary of Defense through this)Tj
-20.244 -1.125 Td
(Board, which is part of DOHA.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.517 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record shows that the Air Force appointed the employee on November 3\
0, 1990. )Tj
34.213 0 Td
(As a )Tj
(reemployed annuitant, the)Tj
-34.213 -1.125 Td
(employee's salary was subject to reduction by the amount of the annuity \
)Tj
29.062 0 Td
(he was receiving as required by 5 U.S.C. )Tj
16.579 0 Td
(8344.)Tj
-45.641 -1.125 Td
(The employee's salary was calculated correctly )Tj
19.06 0 Td
(from November 30, 1990 until February 19, 1994. )Tj
20.358 0 Td
(In January 1994, the)Tj
-39.418 -1.125 Td
(employee's annuity )Tj
7.956 0 Td
(increased, and therefore, he should have expected a corresponding decrea\
se in salary. )Tj
34.401 0 Td
(Due to an)Tj
-42.357 -1.125 Td
(administrative error, the employee's salary was not reduced from Februar\
y 20, 1994 through July 8, )Tj
40.059 0 Td
(1995. )Tj
(On appeal,)Tj
-40.059 -1.125 Td
(the employee contends that from the time of his appointment he had exper\
ienced )Tj
32.573 0 Td
(erratic fluctuations in pay from pay)Tj
-32.573 -1.125 Td
(period to pay period and that pay officials had always assured )Tj
24.964 0 Td
(him that his pay was correct and that the fluctuations were)Tj
-24.964 -1.125 Td
(due to his status as an annuitant. )Tj
13.165 0 Td
(The )Tj
(employee points out that he was actually underpaid in 1993 and 1994. )Tj
30.048 0 Td
(The)Tj
-43.213 -1.125 Td
(employee relies on title )Tj
9.608 0 Td
(4 of the Code of Federal Regulations \(C.F.R.\), Section 91.5 \(4 C.F.R.\
)Tj
28.053 0 Td
(91.5\), )Tj
(a part of GAO's)Tj
-37.661 -1.125 Td
(implementing regulations for 5 U.S.C. )Tj
15.609 0 Td
(5584, to support his argument that his debt should be waived )Tj
24.608 0 Td
(because he was not)Tj
-40.217 -1.125 Td
(guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, fault or lack of good faith.)Tj
T*
(Our review of the record indicates that the employee received Notificati\
ons of Personnel Actions, )Tj
39.292 0 Td
(starting from the one)Tj
-39.292 -1.125 Td
(dated November 30, 1990, pertaining to his appointment, which indicated \
that )Tj
31.493 0 Td
(his annual salary was to be reduced by)Tj
-31.493 -1.125 Td
(the amount of his retirement annuity and by future cost of )Tj
23.355 0 Td
(living increases. )Tj
6.748 0 Td
(Also, the DFAS and Air Force administrative)Tj
-30.103 -1.125 Td
(reports and the GAO found that as a )Tj
14.718 0 Td
(result of several cost-of-living increases between his appointment and t\
he)Tj
-14.718 -1.125 Td
(administrative error in )Tj
9.191 0 Td
(1994, and the corresponding decreases to his salary, he should have reas\
onably expected a salary)Tj
-9.191 -1.125 Td
(decrease as a result of the January 1994 cost of living increase. When t\
his did not occur, he should )Tj
39.627 0 Td
(have questioned why)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(^gڎG)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rfQѬ,W4&ݸ1F!*(1*^x!^^('x!*^x32Gl#TwWuw炙z@
=?o*hBla
INj;9"Ɇۿ ]%(pA b?4P F|x `a =lpb
Uhi( &vcfrP)|0,:1t+*;J>*#@UklߡcuqO>{??/z٧o@T47h Æ'9*cƎ?ۉRR'7%mӦH9k/X(sq֒X"{eNk֮3ߐQڔ_pmw,ڵ{}<#%GK?Qv3gq._덊@E:c95MM*H)R4KʕJϵ^ڞry