%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:35-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:35-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:35-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97011409
uuid:8e07e357-136b-43bf-9979-52509f39692a
uuid:9bd65433-5b29-47a4-a084-d7cbfd5dcf89
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97011409)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/97011409.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:35 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(In Re: [Redacted])Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claimant)Tj
T*
(DATE: June 6, 1997)Tj
T*
(Claims Case No. 97011409)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Waiver of an indebtedness arising from erroneous payment of pay and allo\
wances is appropriate )Tj
38.82 0 Td
(when collection would)Tj
-38.82 -1.125 Td
(be against equity and good conscience and not in the best interest of th\
e )Tj
28.936 0 Td
(United States but may not be exercised if there)Tj
-28.936 -1.125 Td
(is an indication of fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or )Tj
21.077 0 Td
(lack of good faith on the part of the service member or employee.)Tj
-21.077 -1.125 Td
(An individual is at fault if he/she )Tj
13.414 0 Td
(knows or should know that a payment was erroneous and failed to set asid\
e the)Tj
-13.414 -1.125 Td
(overpayment for its )Tj
8.081 0 Td
(eventual return to the government.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-8.081 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.375 TD
(, the service member, appeals the settlement of the U.S. General Account\
ing Office \(GAO\))Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 453.5078 492.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 453.5078 492 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 464.8765 488.25 Tm
( which )Tj
(disallowed his)Tj
-37.406 -1.125 Td
(application of waiver of an indebtedness owed to the government because \
of )Tj
30.878 0 Td
(erroneous payment of pay and allowances.)Tj
-30.878 -1.125 Td
(Under Section 105\(b\) of Public Law No. 104-316, )Tj
20.385 0 Td
(Congress transferred to the Director of OMB the Comptroller)Tj
-20.385 -1.125 Td
(General's authority to consider )Tj
12.51 0 Td
(applications from service members for waiver of a debt to the government\
resulting from)Tj
-12.51 -1.125 Td
(the )Tj
(erroneous payment of pay and allowances. )Tj
18.771 0 Td
(The OMB Director delegated this authority to the )Tj
20.05 0 Td
(Secretary of Defense)Tj
-38.821 -1.375 Td
(effective December 18, 1996.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 158.2656 422.25 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 158.2656 421.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 169.6343 417.75 Tm
( The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals )Tj
18.548 0 Td
(\(DOHA\) now exercises all of the)Tj
-31.351 -1.125 Td
(authority transferred or delegated to the Secretary of Defense )Tj
24.739 0 Td
(through this Board, which is part of DOHA.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-3.222 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record indicates that the service member retired due to disability o\
n September 14, 1993, but )Tj
39.099 0 Td
(that he received active)Tj
-39.099 -1.375 Td
(duty pay and allowances through October 15, 1993.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 264.2734 341.25 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 264.2734 340.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 275.6421 336.75 Tm
( A debt of $2,457.84 )Tj
(resulted from the erroneous payments)Tj
-21.637 -1.125 Td
(involved. )Tj
4 0 Td
(The service member filed an application for waiver )Tj
20.769 0 Td
(of this indebtedness, and under title 10, United States)Tj
-24.768 -1.125 Td
(Code, Section 2774 \(10 U.S.C. )Tj
(2774\), the )Tj
(GAO agreed with the recommendation of the Defense Finance and)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Accounting Service \(DFAS\), )Tj
(Indianapolis Center, to allow $137.73, but disallow $2,320.11.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 458.9395 297.75 Tm
(\(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 458.9395 297 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 267.75 Tm
(The service member's spouse appealed on his behalf. )Tj
21.423 0 Td
(Although she was not specific about the timing )Tj
19.108 0 Td
(of these events, the)Tj
-40.531 -1.125 Td
(spouse contends that her husband would not have known that he was receiv\
ing )Tj
31.743 0 Td
(an erroneous payment of pay and)Tj
-31.743 -1.125 Td
(allowances because he had received a disability retirement and had )Tj
27.043 0 Td
(to deal with numerous operations and hospital stays.)Tj
-27.043 -1.125 Td
(The service member's spouse also stated that it )Tj
18.953 0 Td
(was a very confusing time in their lives and that they were primarily)Tj
-18.953 -1.125 Td
(concerned about her husband's )Tj
12.509 0 Td
(health. )Tj
2.943 0 Td
(She pointed out that the paperwork was slower than the pace of events an\
d)Tj
-15.453 -1.125 Td
(suggests that the )Tj
6.86 0 Td
(pay records were confusing even under normal circumstances for an educat\
ed person. )Tj
34.514 0 Td
(She said that )Tj
5.36 0 Td
(it)Tj
-46.734 -1.125 Td
(was insulting for GAO and DFAS to conclude that her husband knew that he\
was overpaid for one )Tj
39.658 0 Td
(month, and referred)Tj
-39.658 -1.125 Td
(to language in the letters as accusatory.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.906 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(While GAO's and DFAS's correspondence was direct and business-like, we d\
o not believe that either )Tj
40.627 0 Td
(Agency intended)Tj
-40.627 -1.125 Td
(anything accusatory. )Tj
8.525 0 Td
(Some of the direct language about the service member's )Tj
22.589 0 Td
(responsibility to review his pay voucher)Tj
-31.114 -1.125 Td
(may stem from the statutory language itself which requires )Tj
23.799 0 Td
(adjudicators to make a finding that there is no "indication of)Tj
-23.799 -1.125 Td
(fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or lack )Tj
15.55 0 Td
(of good faith" by the service member. )Tj
15.403 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 387.4375 81 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 404.7637 81.75 Tm
( 10 U.S.C. 2774\(b\).)Tj
-32.397 -2.125 Td
(We appreciate the stress that the service member and his family may have\
experienced around the )Tj
39.428 0 Td
(time of )Tj
3.11 0 Td
(his discharge.)Tj
-42.538 -1.125 Td
(However, the service member's immediate notification of DFAS and his sta\
te )Tj
31.228 0 Td
(National Guard headquarters about the)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(H:g6zO\r)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|{|LkΜ5DBH$'E]^7,^*֭▤yHR*-"^H=#ԫd\4$3w.|{:g}?{}@ 0"{}֢Uи~bvR/ E 1R
~]ԻŧJn(pAIc>$Pc}13Pk ~ <%$qwJ-M.9:-a. U'C/(zA)F:p^OXe_$)Q2BB}J%,k$M4wDZMzbx5G7j3Ҟ )V!@QQk1(ie=E~倁Q*&6.~P!IC12Qƌ '};9L5}F̜Y̝;?oB,^pY+ͫVY+[_a[n۾c{!)9ZzN9[s+.\tWY+o@!
4}5P4ZJ2RtVz[ȟ)r&WO;u}zgpb#eΐ!?)JUQ*/VDP,c0
OYyU&M&_S)Ȥ6u7EB5>FFT}TH
Sj:QP9jNݬV%)zU1sxTxLx|aқ6l6;εq?6{{{'CvgMLյOkkTGYYbOh1ji0)R+eNRT.=F}hy