%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:55-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:54-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:55-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97102801
uuid:f1b72c9a-3821-42e7-90ec-ed05a8b594b7
uuid:f3203f47-d57d-4651-a10c-460e634fe05e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[27 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97102801)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/97102801.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:55 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 650.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
580.5 -0.75 l
581.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
580.5 -0.751 l
579.75 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 648.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 596.5002 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: November 6, 1997)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(Claims Case No. 97102801)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Upon separation in mid-September, a service member received appropriate \
separation pay. )Tj
36.569 0 Td
(Subsequent payments of)Tj
-36.569 -1.125 Td
(end-of-September and mid-October pay were erroneous. )Tj
22.852 0 Td
(Service member)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.775 0 Td
(should have questioned his entitlement to)Tj
-29.627 -1.125 Td
(these payments and set aside the amounts for eventual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.91 0 Td
(return to the government. )Tj
10.414 0 Td
(The service member is considered at)Tj
-32.324 -1.125 Td
(fault for not questioning his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.36 0 Td
(entitlement. )Tj
4.999 0 Td
(Waiver is denied.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-16.358 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(A former Staff Sergeant in the United States Army appeals the Settlement\
Certificate this Office)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.793 0 Td
(issued on September)Tj
-38.793 -1.125 Td
(26, 1997, in DOHA Claims No. 97091712, in which we denied his applicatio\
n)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.635 0 Td
(for waiver of an erroneous payment of)Tj
-31.635 -1.375 Td
(pay and allowances totaling $2,192.60.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 203.623 438.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 203.623 438 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 408.75 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record indicates that the member was separated from the Army on Sept\
ember 16, 1994, and was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.515 0 Td
(paid through his)Tj
-40.515 -1.125 Td
(separation on September 15, 1994, in the amount of $960.28. )Tj
24.718 0 Td
(After his separation,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.386 0 Td
(he received September end-of-month)Tj
-33.104 -1.125 Td
(and October mid-month pay for a total)Tj
T*
(of $2,192.60. )Tj
(The Settlement denied waiver of this amount stating that the member shou\
ld have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.547 0 Td
(questioned his)Tj
-38.547 -1.125 Td
(entitlement to receive these payments.)Tj
T*
(On appeal, the service member disputes our statement that he should have\
questioned his agency,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.183 0 Td
(stating that he called)Tj
-39.183 -1.125 Td
(the Defense Finance and Accounting Office \(DFAS\) toll-free number to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.102 0 Td
(determine the nature of the debt after receiving)Tj
-29.102 -1.125 Td
(notifications of the debt in January 1996 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.107 0 Td
(subsequent months. )Tj
(He contends that because the overpayment was the)Tj
-18.107 -1.125 Td
(result of an administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.719 0 Td
(error on the part of DFAS, DFAS violated its regulations by not automati\
cally waiving the)Tj
-10.719 -1.125 Td
(debt. )Tj
(In)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(addition, he argues that a refund of $467.94 in withholdings is due him \
for September and October)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.046 0 Td
(1994 and)Tj
-43.046 -1.125 Td
(should be applied to his debt, and he questions the clothing allowance r\
eflected in his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.38 0 Td
(Leave and Earnings Statement.)Tj
-34.38 -1.125 Td
(Additionally, the service member seeks proration of his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.466 0 Td
(indebtedness if waiver is denied on appeal.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-0.561 -2.125 Td
(Discussion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.906 -2.125 Td
(We may grant waiver of a debt arising out of an erroneous payment of pay\
and allowances to service)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.568 0 Td
(members or former)Tj
-40.568 -1.125 Td
(members if collection would be against equity and good conscience and no\
t in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.575 0 Td
(the best interest of the United States,)Tj
-31.575 -1.125 Td
(provided there is no indication of fraud, fault,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.495 0 Td
(misrepresentation, or lack of good faith on the part of the member. )Tj
26.88 0 Td
(See 10)Tj
-45.375 -1.125 Td
(U.S.C. \247 2774 \(1995\). )Tj
(In the present case, the erroneous payment was made as a result of admin\
istrative error, and there)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(no indication of fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of good faith on the \
service member's part in that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.613 0 Td
(regard.)Tj
-40.613 -2.125 Td
(The standard employed to determine whether a member was at fault in acce\
pting an erroneous)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.958 0 Td
(payment is whether,)Tj
-37.958 -1.125 Td
(under the particular circumstances involved, a reasonable person should \
have)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.183 0 Td
(been aware that he was receiving)Tj
-31.183 -1.125 Td
(payments to which he was not entitled. )Tj
15.83 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 205.9609 52.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 223.2871 53.25 Tm
( Standards for Waiver,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.302 0 Td
(4 C.F.R. \247 91.5\(b\) \(1996\); DOHA Claims Case No.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(97013104 \(March 20, 1997\); and )Tj
(Jeffrey S.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 177.9707 39 cm
0 0 m
48.984 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 226.9551 39.75 Tm
(Hopf)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 226.9551 39 cm
0 0 m
24.662 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 251.6172 39.75 Tm
(, B-260184, July 28, 1995. )Tj
(We have consistently held that when a)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(3*{\rݰs<)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p fQ,j+nu#AQg$ވ"xx!*^x+3:Gl#ztHYV UHL\rlJI9 ˋjHR~%o20M@aL'!h8(>v/A
{/z1o(ǭJSo 6M('Cc{ xa#S8TsOD4z97)Xn-P_R>4$k4zI'I{Oxq^=: g<ѕZ댴tfm'j
\ O(P`(Z52n^u}Рa`Ah
UjҴޢ;Z6m۽?hߡcvQ?{??{ѧo?:&_
O8hpRcƎ̈́i链SN>cYsΛ {a],`V]^ڰh-[m߱s={?pK=vST.^뵪g@D:a"95MF)D)ҤL@:#=zi{-hy<]-O1;uim}zgPbАAAe?) CQ)_*mJr^(00ܐi57<17N60.01iLl6MmS7S)>DbTjTOGWP&j:US
uZ'3UnXdXNa1aqa aC5Od6;?{{GvgM\յOkk!TGYYbOk1jj
P)J'eN
Bzߑȱ4y