%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:13:57-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:57-04:00
2021-06-11T15:13:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97120901
uuid:202207d3-0015-43b5-a6f3-6d98035c410c
uuid:fecd675e-526f-4d64-981f-05826a1226cf
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97120901)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/97120901.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:13:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 650.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 648.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
BT
/Article <>BDC
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 15, 1998)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(Claims Case No. 97120901)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(Collection of erroneous payments is neither against equity and good cons\
cience nor contrary to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.794 0 Td
(interests of the)Tj
-39.794 -1.125 Td
(United States when a National Guard member who was experiencing problems\
with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.88 0 Td
(his pay account from the beginning)Tj
-33.88 -1.125 Td
(of his tour of duty received erroneous payments during his tour.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
([Redacted])Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.386 0 Td
( )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, a member of the Army National Guard, appeals the decision of the Defen\
se Office of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.07 0 Td
(Hearings and Appeals)Tj
-39.457 -1.125 Td
(\(DOHA\), which disallowed his request that the government waive the deb\
t)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.214 0 Td
(he incurred as a result of the erroneous)Tj
-30.214 -1.125 Td
(payment of $3,144.00 of pay and allowances that he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.133 0 Td
(received in June 1994 while on active duty.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0.384 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record shows that the member was called to active duty for special w\
ork at the National Guard)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.875 0 Td
(Bureau from March)Tj
-39.875 -1.125 Td
(through August 1994. )Tj
(According to the record, there were problems with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.937 0 Td
(member's pay from the beginning of his)Tj
-30.937 -1.125 Td
(tour. )Tj
(As a result, the member's check dated April 19, 1994,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.813 0 Td
(was recalled from the bank to settle casual payments he)Tj
-23.813 -1.125 Td
(received on April 5, 1994, and on April 15,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.552 0 Td
(1994. )Tj
(He still had a debt balance due for the casual payments, in the amount)Tj
-17.552 -1.125 Td
(of $1,115.04. )Tj
(DFAS)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.39 0 Td
(withheld $1,107.85 on his May 31, 1994, Leave and Earnings Statement \(L\
ES\) and $1,097.18 on)Tj
-8.39 -1.125 Td
(his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(June 15, 1994, LES. )Tj
(He was then due an adjustment of $1,089.99 for an over-collection. )Tj
36.992 0 Td
(This was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(refunded on his)Tj
-36.992 -1.125 Td
(July 20, 1994, LES. )Tj
(Both in May and June, the member questioned the local)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.773 0 Td
(finance officer as to why withholdings)Tj
-30.773 -1.125 Td
(were being made. )Tj
7.33 0 Td
(In both instances, the finance officer)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.855 0 Td
(made casual payments to the member in the amount of the)Tj
-22.185 -1.125 Td
(withholdings stating that the refund)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.47 0 Td
(would correct an error generated by DFAS due to problems in loading him \
into the)Tj
-14.47 -1.125 Td
(pay system early)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.97 0 Td
(in his active duty tour. )Tj
9.221 0 Td
(The casual payments the member received in June, totaling $3,144.00, wer\
e)Tj
-16.191 -1.125 Td
(collected in August 1994. )Tj
10.526 0 Td
(The member claims that holding these collections to within 30 days of th\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.854 0 Td
(end of his tour of)Tj
-40.38 -1.125 Td
(duty caused such enormous collections to be made that his ability to sup\
port basic)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.049 0 Td
(needs such as food and shelter was)Tj
-33.049 -1.125 Td
(severely impaired.)Tj
T*
(The administrative report states that the member was aware that discrepa\
ncies existed in his pay)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.681 0 Td
(and this should have)Tj
-38.681 -1.125 Td
(given him more reason to review his payments very carefully. )Tj
25.02 0 Td
(DFAS contends)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(that the member should have compared)Tj
-25.02 -1.125 Td
(what he received and what he should normally receive. )Tj
22.269 0 Td
(Since some of the payments were casual payments, he should)Tj
-22.269 -1.125 Td
(have kept track of them and ensured)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.744 0 Td
(they did not exceed his normal pay entitlement. )Tj
19.245 0 Td
(DFAS determined that the)Tj
-33.989 -1.125 Td
(member's failure to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.983 0 Td
(keep track of all payments he was receiving and compare the amount to hi\
s monthly entitlement)Tj
-7.983 -1.125 Td
(makes him partially at fault in the matter, which statutorily precludes \
favorable waiver)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.877 0 Td
(consideration.)Tj
-34.877 -2.125 Td
(The member contends that he could not have reasonably known that the two\
casual payments in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.6 0 Td
(June would constitute)Tj
-38.6 -1.125 Td
(an overpayment. )Tj
6.914 0 Td
(In the member's August 28, 1996, memorandum to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.622 0 Td
(DFAS-Denver, he states that the finance officer)Tj
-27.536 -1.125 Td
(issued a casual payment to replace the collection)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.714 0 Td
(he questioned without benefit of researching the issues or contacting)Tj
-19.714 -1.125 Td
(DFAS to determine the validity)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.859 0 Td
(of the collections. )Tj
7.387 0 Td
(The member acknowledges that if the finance officer had properly)Tj
-20.246 -1.125 Td
(researched)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.524 0 Td
(these pay issues, it would have been determined that these were legitima\
te collections recouping)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.793 0 Td
(prior casual)Tj
-43.317 -1.125 Td
(payments.)Tj
EMC
ET
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(ƪgNdS)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rxfQѬ,d57F(APTE#
x!^(
}፨xxψ+ʸjM20=jߧ~&CBdZ
/WXBbN 7ft!֯ˀz }Ims
ap⸸؏> Ԯ@!у~13Pk3Db}B2DŽ>n8<&Z~'
ȳ ]RFٜT 0NP̯"?8yg( 䑱ɚQM^
$k!C//[(ԗ8/^ɲFD ^܄w.Y#'8Qkv9N,p
D/h\sAI+NUۧ@
6jP5&M/-ZӪmӶ{-:vî>'^gy//W1b4lxR=f8)uo}33fʜ5g,ZrXju7H
7mu;wxHcOu8Rgkg=ƨ)BHi&8eJr鹶6R~G+G3Y\~`]>OC!SbPI#AD4PPJKuZy&w!Őe`hL3fTWpjh
~)4'p|)KS_s*N/8E#dn.2?Rpdo'8uwwWx7
h9