%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:14:07-04:00
2021-06-11T15:14:06-04:00
2021-06-11T15:14:07-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98051810
uuid:78d8a0e1-c1c0-45a6-8053-7442540f87c3
uuid:a69b00f6-cbde-462b-839f-7a2a18f55d6f
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj
[27 0 R 28 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98051810)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/98051810.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:14:06 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 650.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 648.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 490.4277 749.25 Tm
(DATE: June 19, 1998)Tj
-39.536 -2.75 Td
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 98051810)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Member who received overpayments when her pay was not reduced in accorda\
nce with her court-martial sentence is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(considered partially at fault and cannot)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.827 0 Td
(have the debt waived under 10 U.S.C. \247 2774.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-15.827 -2.125 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(This is in response to an appeal of the Defense Office of Hearings and A\
ppeals \(DOHA\) Settlement Certificate, DOHA)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(Claim No. 98033002, April 29, 1998,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.277 0 Td
(which denied waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247 2774 of $1,375.13)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 479.9512 453.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 479.9512 453 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 491.3198 449.25 Tm
( of a former)Tj
-39.61 -1.125 Td
(member's debt to the United States resulting from erroneous payments rec\
eived incident)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.503 0 Td
(to her military service.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-13.987 -2.125 Td
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record indicates that the member was tried by a special court martia\
l on December 1, 1993, and was awarded a bad)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(conduct discharge, reduction in grade)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.272 0 Td
(from an E-5 to an E-1, and forfeiture of 2/3 of her pay for a period of \
6 months.)Tj
-15.272 -1.125 Td
(On January 14, 1994, the convening authority approved and ordered execut\
ed a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.045 0 Td
(forfeiture of $514 pay per month for six)Tj
-32.045 -1.375 Td
(months and reduction to the grade of Private, E-1.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 255.9355 345.75 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 255.9355 345 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 267.3042 341.25 Tm
( Due to an administrative error, however, the Defense Finance and)Tj
-20.942 -1.125 Td
(Accounting Service \(DFAS\) failed to reduce the member's pay. As a resu\
lt, the member was overpaid $1,375.13 from)Tj
T*
(January 14, 1994, through March 30,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1994.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Settlement Certificate denied waiver stating that the member was awa\
re that the court-martial sentence included a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(reduction in grade and forfeiture of pay;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.299 0 Td
(and, therefore, should have questioned the accuracy of her pay. On appea\
l, the)Tj
-16.299 -1.125 Td
(member states that following her court martial there was confusion as to\
her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.685 0 Td
(disposition, but on several occasions she)Tj
-30.685 -1.125 Td
(did question her pay and allowances. She states that she was advised tha\
t nothing could be done until the convening)Tj
T*
(authority approved the court-martial sentence. Additionally, she explain\
s the hardship caused by having to pay the debt.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
22.351 -2.125 Td
(Decision)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.351 -2.125 Td
(Under 10 U.S.C. \247 2774, we may waive a claim of the United States aga\
inst a member or former member of the)Tj
T*
(uniformed services for erroneous payments of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.661 0 Td
(pay and allowances if collection would be against equity and good)Tj
-18.661 -1.125 Td
(conscience and not in the best interest of the United States. Waiver can\
not be granted if there)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.486 0 Td
(exists any indication of)Tj
-37.486 -1.125 Td
(fraud, fault, misrepresentation, or lack of good faith by the member or \
former member. )Tj
35.043 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 436.5215 142.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 453.8477 143.25 Tm
( Standards for Waiver, 4)Tj
-36.487 -1.125 Td
(C.F.R. \247 91.5\(b\).)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(The standard employed to determine whether a member was at fault in acce\
pting an overpayment is)Tj
T*
(whether, under the particular circumstances involved, a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.408 0 Td
(reasonable person would have been aware that he was receiving)Tj
-22.408 -1.125 Td
(more than his entitlement. )Tj
10.692 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 144.3027 102 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 161.6289 102.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Petty Officer Ricky Johnson, USN)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 164.6289 102 cm
0 0 m
166.318 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 330.9473 102.75 Tm
(, B-256417, July 22, 1994.)Tj
-26.246 -2.125 Td
(In this case, the administrative report indicates that the member knew o\
f the court-martial sentence which included a)Tj
T*
(forfeiture of pay and reduction in grade. In our opinion, there is reaso\
nable basis for DFAS's determination, as the)Tj
T*
(member was on the distribution list to receive a copy of Special Court-M\
artial Order #2, dated January 14, 1994.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(Ë 'n)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
CQ%Vhb:P~1:i_;'*c wߛ&hZg=][6 L7]=(W8QWWYGX'?ӳ/Rћ[wZAT݆:rĐ` kDKٺaudoDơ6kw%a䐝9o=K٥1ߵWYqvC'[-NxǬ5s*2̅p|>2Og iAZ4;8#; #Ȟ(Ȟ(Ȟx>033'''g*n)rnrV|[6˓Zm=^S 6
endstream
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H|w\GϾ>4A}w^S949[̝FvQ HQTQ4bCkEX#vŮݨ1|4ͪ?33Owg !-Z57WXlBF'E%3@@Pntj1/K:eYl6i~ 8:ə @5Ih1@j1_x0h}Z=4.)%MB|*qXtF
*IQi
9ơQI1)DXp)P*#b56zIA^^$I}Jy%,k$-4wDZ?1sU .ZgA.Kܫ!HQ!kh5wᔴ2^>|jթ[~
d UiܤԼEZ~m~_">];}ҹ_~wYW>}FA1'$&
<|ȔSG3q'LvRwO2u33ge͞3w9aeyW\ze7lٺmv[ophɱ'N:}Rp+WqjQ~0U0\f"FI4i\:'h{-/dy&?+t}zWp|pB.CaG%H V:+ݕ^J2Nٮ+RT*N pcqiiiiYcfdn`VM1!
Uz~jZOm5QfS\uQݪQbzN>k1l`XtXlXBذf6h1Y&[-׆pGcG'CWUtUeuՕg3Yr,q4И4}5R)2LiT*F}(y/8
l,u-fK冖`G[bU84: nNB@rqRk
xj