%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:14:48-04:00
2021-06-11T15:14:47-04:00
2021-06-11T15:14:48-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
99030812
uuid:d78360a5-c609-485f-aea2-3e66e7758cc6
uuid:5c2c7d0b-1973-418b-8d5c-dac7e8fa77e4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(99030812)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(sktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/military/Archived%20-\
%20HTML%20Word/99030812.html)Tj
49.657 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:14:48 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 759.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 758.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 675.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 675 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 674.2503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 675 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
([Redacted])Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(\))Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(March 25, 1999)Tj
T*
(Claims Case No. 99030812)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(When a member is aware that he has received an overpayment, he does not \
acquire title to the excess amounts, and he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(has a duty to hold)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.36 0 Td
(the money for eventual repayment. In such circumstances waiver is not pr\
oper under 10 U.S.C. \247)Tj
-7.36 -1.125 Td
(2774.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(A former Navy member appeals the February 5, 1999, Settlement Certificat\
e of the Defense Office of Hearings and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Appeals \(DOHA\) in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(DOHA Claim No. 98113019, which denied )Tj
26.024 0 Td
(the service member's request for waiver of $14,877.85,)Tj
-26.024 -1.375 Td
(resulting from the erroneous)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.608 0 Td
(payment of a Selective Re-enlistment Bonus \(SRB\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 405.584 426.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 405.584 426 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 396.75 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record shows that on October 18, 1995, the member petitioned the Boa\
rd of Correction of Naval Records \(BCNR\))Tj
T*
(to change his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.526 0 Td
(record to show that he "be able to reenlist as of 95MAR31 for 48 months \
with no loss of SRB." On August)Tj
-5.526 -1.125 Td
(6, 1996, the BCNR changed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.526 0 Td
(the member's record to show that he reenlisted on March 1, 1995, for 48 \
months which)Tj
-11.526 -1.125 Td
(entitled the member to a zone "B" SRB. As a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.285 0 Td
(result of this action, the member was authorized a SRB in the total amou\
nt)Tj
-18.285 -1.125 Td
(of $26,970. In his September 5, 1996, letter to the BCNR the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.608 0 Td
(member objected to)Tj
7.941 0 Td
(the action of the BCNR because he had)Tj
-32.549 -1.125 Td
(asked for a correction to allow him to reenlist, not to reenlist him. On\
November 21, 1996, the member then initiated)Tj
T*
(action to rescind the August 6th correction, which the BCNR approved on \
January 13,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.77 0 Td
(1997. Meanwhile, as of October)Tj
-34.77 -1.125 Td
(1, 1996, the member had received three SRB payments totaling $16,181.20.\
)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Navy then initiated action to recover the erroneous SRB payments. Th\
e Navy first asked for a payment of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
($7,723.31. The member)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.831 0 Td
(enclosed his June 30, 1997, check in that amount with a letter to a loca\
l disbursing officer)Tj
-9.831 -1.125 Td
(specifically advising that the amount)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.968 0 Td
(requested was incorrect because his actual indebtedness was about twice \
that)Tj
-14.968 -1.125 Td
(amount. The member also requested verification of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.187 0 Td
(correct indebtedness.)Tj
-22.187 -2.125 Td
(The member then received a letter from the Defense Finance and Accountin\
g Service \(DFAS\) in Denver advising him)Tj
T*
(that he owed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.359 0 Td
($7,720.60. In his August 5, 1997, letter the member stated that he would\
stop payment on the first check he)Tj
-5.359 -1.125 Td
(sent and make payment in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.691 0 Td
(the new amount requested. The member again stated that the actual amount\
of indebtedness)Tj
-10.691 -1.125 Td
(was about twice the amount requested, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.439 0 Td
(he requested confirmation of his actual indebtedness. The record also)Tj
-17.439 -1.125 Td
(contains a copy of correspondence to his Congressional)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.494 0 Td
(representative in which the member relates an additional written)Tj
-22.494 -1.125 Td
(or verbal effort in October 1997 to clarify the amount of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.214 0 Td
(indebtedness. On November 13, 1997, DFAS \(Denver\))Tj
-24.214 -1.125 Td
(advised the member that the debt originator \(DFAS-Cleveland\) had adjus\
ted his)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.242 0 Td
(debt from $7,685.85 to $14,877.85, and)Tj
-32.242 -1.125 Td
(that it had applied his payment of $7,720.60 to the debt.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In his appeal, the member states that DOHA did not adequately consider s\
ome of the details involved. First, he points)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(out that he told the BCNR not to make any payments to him well before an\
y payments were made. Thus he disputes that)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(the payments were "erroneous" because they were triggered by BCNR's refu\
sal to correct an error it had made. Second,)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(TsMn)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p rfQѬ,d57F(CDPTE#
7^x'Ⅸxxψ+jM20=jߧ~&BBTϚ7OXBcSbRLZ@@@^4C_f S1 }
]A1qþ N?mX{SFwWI軁[&ގmBo3:aOĤw̭Uazk