%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:36:49-04:00
2021-06-11T15:36:49-04:00
2021-06-11T15:36:49-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
04041303
uuid:7c58f647-1905-45ce-9edb-1dcd9c10ff80
uuid:3845b37d-ecce-492a-9614-271171694f7a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(04041303)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/04041303.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:36:49 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 654.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 654.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 653.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 654.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 531.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 531 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 530.2503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 531 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 669.75 Tm
(April 19, 2004)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Andrews Van Lines, Inc.)Tj
0 -5.375 TD
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(Claims Case No. 04041303 )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -4.375 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -3.25 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(With respect to disputed questions of fact, the Board will accept the st\
atement)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.435 0 Td
(of facts furnished by a service's)Tj
-31.435 -1.125 Td
(administrative office, in the absence of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.799 0 Td
(clear and convincing contrary evidence.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-15.799 -3.25 Td
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Andrews Van Lines, Inc. \(Andrews\), appeals the March 18, 2003, Settlem\
ent )Tj
31.158 0 Td
(Certificate )Tj
4.47 0 Td
(of the Defense Office of)Tj
-35.628 -1.125 Td
(Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in DOHA)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.052 0 Td
(Claim No. 03030501, which disallowed Andrew's claim for a refund of $889\
)Tj
-17.052 -1.375 Td
(for damage to seven inventory items in a service member's shipment of ho\
usehold)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.088 0 Td
(goods.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 444.7305 293.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 444.7305 292.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 249.75 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record indicates that the member's household goods were picked up in\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.116 0 Td
(Fort Rucker, Alabama, on July 31, 2000, and)Tj
-30.116 -1.125 Td
(delivered to Fort Hood, Texas, )Tj
12.525 0 Td
(on September 1, 2000. )Tj
9.276 0 Td
(The shipper claimed damage to the seven items at issue )Tj
22.437 0 Td
(and)Tj
-44.239 -1.125 Td
(submitted the required documentation, including a repair estimate and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.269 0 Td
(photographs, in support of his claim. )Tj
14.943 0 Td
(The Army)Tj
-43.212 -1.125 Td
(adjudicated the claim based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.329 0 Td
(upon those documents.)Tj
-11.329 -2.125 Td
(The carrier appealed the Army's decision to this Office, contending that\
)Tj
28.892 0 Td
(the Army should have based its adjudication on)Tj
-28.892 -1.125 Td
(an inspection and lower repair )Tj
12.356 0 Td
(estimate obtained by the carrier on October 19, 2000. )Tj
21.576 0 Td
(The carrier claims )Tj
7.523 0 Td
(to have sent)Tj
-41.456 -1.125 Td
(their estimate to the Army by letter dated October 24, 2000. )Tj
24.187 0 Td
(However, there is no record of receipt of that estimate by)Tj
-24.187 -1.125 Td
(the Army prior )Tj
6.249 0 Td
(to their payment to the claimant. )Tj
13.246 0 Td
(By letter dated July 9, 2001, the Army )Tj
15.608 0 Td
(advised the carrier that its files)Tj
-35.103 -1.125 Td
(did not contain a copy of the carrier's )Tj
15.119 0 Td
(inspection and estimate. )Tj
9.886 0 Td
(By return letter dated August 31, 2001, the carrier)Tj
-25.005 -1.125 Td
(transmitted a copy of its October 19, 2000, inspection and estimate, and\
its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.16 0 Td
(October 24, 2000, letter. )Tj
10.025 0 Td
(A hand written)Tj
-40.185 -1.125 Td
(notation on the return letter states:)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.94 0 Td
("Not in file so FO must not have rec'd it. )Tj
16.503 0 Td
(Carr's insp was considered in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(subsequent)Tj
-30.443 -1.125 Td
(corres. w/Andrews." )Tj
(Other documentation in the Army's administrative )Tj
28.804 0 Td
(report affirmatively states that the carrier's)Tj
-28.804 -1.125 Td
(inspection was not received )Tj
11.33 0 Td
(before the claim was paid and not used to calculate payment to the claim\
ant, )Tj
30.794 0 Td
(but was)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(PԜG76=Qo_)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p fxUY5YhLV#qcԍ@8DE%Q0^x!*}̈+jM20=jߧ~2 !g-Z/,6!ѱ)1m'N~4C_uf R }]V1qÿ$
C6X=G)iݸ^軀[%&ߎ
Bo3*A OǤ4zgCqZOn,2 zyZDl$hIhN5`T?Czlx\ gWj3Ҟ %V[5p?ѣ`!Kh5/bPʬ{xzyXnP
*),\57jܤ[ҼE˷[~mڶ{EA;uK}g?Y}>}Q1*6.>a@A)6<#G3q3&|;1'M=uZ3g͞7wX8IAeWZfn}ц6oٺmvٻx8\re'N:]^3gϝp\ڮU^60Sj`xri>RS)KYTP*i}=r-VWW2\T9Rdʖ*[Wۺں"lZZښL@YY{;֛UR~kunvvv[MV5|["$Lo%lix_$H---]&L žE"T>6r#yrԁB>x]gzyy{%i;{ww|9C?3uB$kmoo {ҭ~QWN