NNdLkaM 69-<\%R y2 Ra)_3gF6a$LUqVO!1#&~q-ť]R!I E$NBcSGЇ{83BHx 8 w8ôA ѝu *M1ȃoatڅek=;#]ak=;t$ ;89Mj.]&w vPm? 881|ցG-vkYwUlkgs}{JC
74d0hM0Rp3iPmM ~H:ߎ) $3@0V wѠ0։pW3R]Ӏ>3XѰ'@1ls8 89rGjU{H?|!AgG HRPq| }Yj%p%ժ}ڭ9Q2KZBy!OsvYga
\˵bS9Lu ٶmrrE {XojF{Sї@͌2Aݵ
% _nCqpVs'-a_~|߯L$Bgб.5aShy 36E*jE*Ȅ:M&jղl-үkZD#)Rg<0`0FO3|^!0pthI)SyS~(G)< Ѥ0 ¤PEaI)Ė%+< %"F7 QqQaHL;>O;2 cxϠ= *H$?@"= |d >gE'i l n-ٶ鶵_o[ct0 Wu6@3ȯ DA~0 {cI)_b .0 kW'.F#.0@
>Z EG f
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[318.0 349.0 329.0 360.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96070232)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/96070232.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:37:21 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 548.25 591.75 217.499 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Chairman, Claims Appeals Board)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(/s/___________________________)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Joyce N. Maguire)Tj
T*
(Member, Claims Appeals Board)Tj
T*
(/s/_____________________________)Tj
T*
(Christine M. Kopocis)Tj
T*
(Member, Claims Appeals Board)Tj
T*
(1. See Army File No. 88-091-0082, involving a shipment under Personal Pr\
operty Government Bill )Tj
40.078 0 Td
(of Lading PP-)Tj
-40.078 -1.125 Td
(165,740.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(96070232)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/96070232.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:37:21 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Army has clearly established a )Tj
12.523 0 Td
(prima)Tj
ET
Q
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 166.2812 754.5 cm
0 0 m
27.99 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 194.2715 755.25 Tm
( )Tj
(facie)Tj
ET
Q
q 1 0 0 1 197.2715 754.5 cm
0 0 m
23.309 0 l
h
S
Q
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 220.5801 755.25 Tm
( case of carrier liability for )Tj
10.939 0 Td
(damage. )Tj
3.609 0 Td
(Even though Fogarty states that it)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(appealed GAO's settlement by its letter dated January 2, )Tj
22.673 0 Td
(1992, there is no indication on the record of an appeal before)Tj
-22.673 -1.125 Td
(June 5, 1996.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Fogarty appeals the settlement claiming that there is no documentation t\
o support the Army's )Tj
37.45 0 Td
(position that there was)Tj
-37.45 -1.125 Td
(damage to the shipment. )Tj
10.025 0 Td
(Fogarty renews its argument that the DD Form )Tj
18.997 0 Td
(2223 supports its claim. )Tj
9.805 0 Td
(In particular, Fogarty)Tj
-38.827 -1.125 Td
(alleges that the DD Form 1840 is "very suspicious" )Tj
20.786 0 Td
(in light of what Fogarty identifies as the Army's statement that the)Tj
-20.786 -1.125 Td
(Notice of Loss or Damage \(DD )Tj
(Form 1840R\), was fraudulent. )Tj
25.161 0 Td
(Fogarty acknowledges the member's wife's statement that)Tj
-25.161 -1.125 Td
(damages )Tj
3.749 0 Td
(were listed on the DD Form 1840, but questions when the damage was noted\
, stating "it clearly )Tj
38.373 0 Td
(wasn't listed at)Tj
-42.121 -1.125 Td
(the time of delivery.")Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
22.351 -2.125 Td
(Decision)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-22.351 -2.125 Td
(While this appeal is untimely, we will address the merits of the appeal \
because there appears to be )Tj
39.514 0 Td
(no prejudice to the)Tj
-39.514 -1.125 Td
(government due to the delay.)Tj
T*
(Section 31.7 of Title 4 of the Code of Federal Regulations states that c\
laim settlements are based on )Tj
40.184 0 Td
(the facts as)Tj
-40.184 -1.125 Td
(established by the government agency concerned and by evidence submitted\
by the )Tj
33.544 0 Td
(claimants, and the burden is on the)Tj
-33.544 -1.125 Td
(claimant to establish the liability of the United States for )Tj
22.884 0 Td
(payment. )Tj
3.943 0 Td
(Where there is disagreement as to the facts in a case,)Tj
-26.827 -1.125 Td
(the facts are accepted as presented by )Tj
15.242 0 Td
(the agency in the absence of clear and convincing proof to the contrary.\
)Tj
28.877 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 545.4238 504 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 562.75 504.75 Tm
(,)Tj
-45.563 -1.125 Td
(McNamara-Lunz Vans )Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 490.5 cm
0 0 m
113.285 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 129.2852 491.25 Tm
(and Warehouses, Inc.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 129.2852 490.5 cm
0 0 m
103.289 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 232.5742 491.25 Tm
(, 57 Comp. Gen. 415 \(1978\). )Tj
(A )Tj
(prima)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 385.5625 490.5 cm
0 0 m
27.99 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 413.5527 491.25 Tm
( )Tj
(facie)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 416.5527 490.5 cm
0 0 m
23.309 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 439.8613 491.25 Tm
( case of carrier liability is)Tj
-35.322 -1.125 Td
(established by showing that the shipper tendered property to the carrier\
, that the property was not )Tj
39.127 0 Td
(delivered or was)Tj
-39.127 -1.125 Td
(delivered in a more damaged condition, and the amount of damages. )Tj
27.63 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 347.5586 463.5 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 364.8848 464.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Missouri )Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 367.8848 463.5 cm
0 0 m
45.674 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 413.5586 464.25 Tm
(Pacific Railroad Co. v. Elmore &)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 413.5586 463.5 cm
0 0 m
160.295 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 450.75 Tm
(Stahl)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 450 cm
0 0 m
24.668 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 40.668 450.75 Tm
(, 377 U.S. 134 \(1964\). )Tj
(The burden of proof then shifts to the )Tj
24.413 0 Td
(carrier to rebut the )Tj
7.663 0 Td
(prima)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 425.5762 450 cm
0 0 m
27.99 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 453.5664 450.75 Tm
( )Tj
(facie)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 456.5664 450 cm
0 0 m
23.309 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 479.875 450.75 Tm
( liability.)Tj
-38.656 -2.125 Td
(The administrative report includes a DD Form 1840 dated on the delivery \
date and signed by the )Tj
38.906 0 Td
(shipper and Fogarty's)Tj
-38.906 -1.125 Td
(agent. It appears to be valid on its face. )Tj
15.911 0 Td
(The Army accepted this form as )Tj
13.106 0 Td
(valid, and this is evidence of notice to the)Tj
-29.017 -1.125 Td
(carrier of loss or damage. )Tj
10.44 0 Td
(In arguing that timely notice )Tj
11.636 0 Td
(was not provided, Fogarty contends that the DD Form 1840 was)Tj
-22.076 -1.125 Td
(suspect, but it did not provide the )Tj
13.609 0 Td
(Army, when the Army requested it, a copy of a blank DD Form 1840 from th\
is)Tj
-13.609 -1.125 Td
(transaction or )Tj
5.72 0 Td
(otherwise provide evidence that the damages noted on the DD Form 1840 we\
re placed on it after )Tj
38.959 0 Td
(delivery.)Tj
-44.68 -1.125 Td
(The Army's administrative report indicates that an official talked to th\
e member's spouse )Tj
35.711 0 Td
(in 1990 and she confirmed that)Tj
-35.711 -1.125 Td
(she remembered the delivery because her oak table was badly )Tj
24.934 0 Td
(damaged and extensive exceptions were noted on the DD)Tj
-24.934 -1.125 Td
(Form 1840.)Tj
T*
(Fogarty's reliance on the DD Form 2223 is misplaced. )Tj
21.898 0 Td
(The Army's administrative report indicates )Tj
17.37 0 Td
(that it sent a copy of)Tj
-39.268 -1.125 Td
(the DD Form 2223 to Fogarty prior to the close of the period of time tha\
t )Tj
29.439 0 Td
(Fogarty's agent had to forward the DD Form)Tj
-29.439 -1.125 Td
(1840 to the Army destination transportation officer. )Tj
20.939 0 Td
(In )Tj
(any event, the DD Form 2223 itself was not complete. )Tj
23.023 0 Td
(While the)Tj
-43.962 -1.125 Td
(government had not checked the )Tj
13.245 0 Td
("Yes " block on the DD Form 2223 for loss or damage at delivery, neither\
did it check)Tj
-13.245 -1.125 Td
(the "No" )Tj
(block. )Tj
(This is not clear and convincing evidence necessary to overcome a DD For\
m 1840 which is )Tj
43.36 0 Td
(facially)Tj
-43.36 -1.125 Td
(valid.)Tj
T*
(The Army acknowledges that the carrier did not receive timely notice of \
damages noted on the DD )Tj
39.792 0 Td
(Form 1840R. )Tj
(There)Tj
-39.792 -1.125 Td
(is no indication that the Army considered the DD Form 1840R to be )Tj
27.523 0 Td
(fraudulent, and the burden of establishing fraud)Tj
-27.523 -1.125 Td
(rests on the party alleging it and must be proven by )Tj
20.746 0 Td
(evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption in favor of honesty)Tj
-20.746 -1.125 Td
(and fair dealing. )Tj
6.775 0 Td
(See)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 97.2988 171 cm
0 0 m
17.326 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 114.625 171.75 Tm
(, )Tj
(Captain )Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 120.625 171 cm
0 0 m
40.324 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 160.9492 171.75 Tm
(Roger L. Reasonover, Jr., U.S.N.)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 160.9492 171 cm
0 0 m
158.977 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 319.9258 171.75 Tm
(, B-213543, Dec. 7, 1983. )Tj
(Fogarty has not met the)Tj
-25.327 -1.125 Td
(burden of proof )Tj
(establishing fraud. )Tj
14.163 0 Td
(Nor has it overcome the Army's )Tj
13.01 0 Td
(prima)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 342.0801 157.5 cm
0 0 m
27.99 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 370.0703 158.25 Tm
( )Tj
(facie)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 373.0703 157.5 cm
0 0 m
23.309 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 396.3789 158.25 Tm
( case establishing liability.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-9.932 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(We affirm the settlement.)Tj
T*
(/s/___________________________)Tj
T*
(Michael D. Hipple)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Archived%20-%20HTML/96070232.html)
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 41
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003642 00000 n
0000107993 00000 n
0000003533 00000 n
0000003575 00000 n
0000003708 00000 n
0000003735 00000 n
0000107554 00000 n
0000107595 00000 n
0000107370 00000 n
0000004270 00000 n
0000099084 00000 n
0000097804 00000 n
0000003838 00000 n
0000003884 00000 n
0000003933 00000 n
0000004083 00000 n
0000003987 00000 n
0000004019 00000 n
0000004051 00000 n
0000004484 00000 n
0000004509 00000 n
0000010964 00000 n
0000011013 00000 n
0000011049 00000 n
0000011565 00000 n
0000097471 00000 n
0000042954 00000 n
0000043221 00000 n
0000011980 00000 n
0000012253 00000 n
0000012683 00000 n
0000043839 00000 n
0000097993 00000 n
0000099284 00000 n
0000107455 00000 n
0000107811 00000 n
0000107637 00000 n
0000107940 00000 n
trailer
<<902BDC9348477C42BC9B74F32752383C>]>>
startxref
108163
%%EOF