%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:37:41-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:41-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:41-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97110307
uuid:61b5b3f8-da2a-487d-b95e-4cf1c743b897
uuid:b1ebb128-ab24-4f88-ac4b-dab714e4271e
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97110307)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/97110307.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:37:41 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 650.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 648.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 649.5003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 4, 1997)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Stevens Worldwide Van Lines, Inc.)Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(Claims Case No. 97110307)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(In accordance with the Military-Industry Memorandum of Understanding, th\
e military services must use a repair)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(estimate timely submitted by a carrier when it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.605 0 Td
(is the lowest estimate and the service has determined that the carrier's\
)Tj
-18.605 -1.125 Td
(firm can and will perform the repairs adequately for the price stated, b\
ased on the firm's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
35.361 0 Td
(reputation for timely and)Tj
-35.361 -1.125 Td
(satisfactory performance. Even though the service offers a valid reason \
\(repairer qualification\) on appeal for not using)Tj
T*
(the estimate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.054 0 Td
(submitted by the carrier, we will not accept the service's basis for not\
using a carrier's estimate when the)Tj
-5.054 -1.125 Td
(service failed to provide this reason to the carrier)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.853 0 Td
(during the adjudicatory process and merely stated that it was not)Tj
-19.853 -1.125 Td
(required to use the carrier's estimate.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
0 -2.125 TD
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Stevens Worldwide Van Lines, Inc. \(Stevens\) appeals the October 1, 199\
7, Settlement Certificate of the Defense Office)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(DOHA Claim No. 97072411, which disallowed Stevens' claim for a refund of\
)Tj
T*
($504 set off by the United States Army Claims Service to recover transit\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.299 0 Td
(damages in the shipment of a service member's)Tj
-29.299 -1.375 Td
(household goods.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 100 384.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 100 384 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 354.75 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The shipment was picked up in Radcliff, Kentucky, on December 3, 1992, a\
nd delivered to Langley Air Force Base,)Tj
T*
(Virginia, on February 22, 1993. In this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.72 0 Td
(appeal, Stevens disputes the amount of its liability with respect to fra\
med)Tj
-15.72 -1.125 Td
(artwork and memorabilia, inventory items #120, #122-#125, and #128-#131.\
)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(All the inventory items in question were packed by the carrier in mirror\
containers. On the Notice of Loss or Damage,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(DD Form 1840R, the shipper noted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.416 0 Td
(damages to these items including marred frames, artwork loose in the fra\
me, and)Tj
-14.416 -1.125 Td
(felt pads missing off the back of some of the frames. The shipper submit\
ted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.465 0 Td
(two estimates from frame shops for)Tj
-30.465 -1.125 Td
(repair/replacement of the frames. The Army used the lower of the shipper\
-supplied estimates \(for remounting and)Tj
T*
(replacement frames ranging from $20.33 to $121.97 per item\) in adjudica\
ting the claim with the shipper and in making)Tj
T*
(demand against Stevens.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Stevens submitted an estimate from a furniture repair shop which the cla\
ims office considered in adjudicating the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(member's claim, but ultimately rejected. The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.118 0 Td
(furniture repair shop estimate was for repair of each frame for a cost o\
f $10)Tj
-18.118 -1.125 Td
(to $30 per item. The claims office concluded that the two frame shops' o\
pinions that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.894 0 Td
(it was less expensive to replace the)Tj
-33.894 -1.125 Td
(frames than repair them were more reasonable than the furniture repair s\
hop's opinion that the frames could be repaired)Tj
T*
(for a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(low cost. In addition, the claims office found that Stevens did not show\
that the shipper's repair estimate was)Tj
T*
(unreasonable. Our Settlement Certificate upheld)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.549 0 Td
(the Army's actions as reasonable. Over the carrier's protests for not)Tj
-19.549 -1.125 Td
(using the carrier-supplied estimate, the Army merely advised Stevens tha\
t use of the carrier's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.362 0 Td
(estimate was not)Tj
-37.362 -1.125 Td
(mandatory.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Stevens contends that the Army should have used its lower rep\
air estimate. Stevens states that the Army did)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not raise the issue of the furniture repair)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.272 0 Td
(service being a qualified repair firm for wooden picture frames until af\
ter)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(`[NPԅD)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p ^(GԸj4&K<1YƍQ7PxFH}+"(
Ⅸ2#!~4?~~ ^ ?k&`B,a
INn7%zY1S)7] ԯ-%(pA>$PmE>b<7R,~ NJsBA I-Mdۄ>)zlrt0NLX]%:5<2.YTe`HR2rB}Jو%,k$
t 8k䡎Vg}@NS6=]oC=Qk~GBFj49_ĠYwsSϿ^
4n5͚/-[~Mw֮{-;un?'g}y//FFE㫘ظA$ML609M+Xdj!Dv}ܷW<]6$Z<2=c={{oΫ͘Ax~t0
qVމ%wK>x5(a
4鸋1>) N"<>lP$!Ðd(|X8LD|B m={($Ғ;j(rZZ8IGz8)VRl!7r'մ:ZOf@)6fʣ|Bv4fIvա=ɇ/n#GETlOt!:L
!Q jLM((WE
H&:FI*St)Tq
:K<]^zR3j۸Cy&<<x!/ży)g!c=L^Y9W^x= ڡ7r.o͜x+oCM❼y7ὼx?>ȇ0>ʥ| .\Χ4
mV:eGCd,,d&|yȗ2_\5||o?=?.eBW,:]]O/Uu}˅mletDʲ4)cfHB)4i@8q1 ]@ne|g2>|~xytNЉ:I'tЙ:r#c/%e||{=*JʫjZW=lD\unes~[O;]=]3,=[s\=OBH/KH^^/+>k^CAoԛ"#g"g#""fEmc]ПONK{^'r7dNTNtLln9y]]ݣcO,^778 |0#pdq>cq.nʅ\9#Vܚ\q.ER\qU6梹d.\k\/h$-Hvʝ;]sϹ