%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:37:44-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:44-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:44-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
97122315
uuid:d1191a98-1f37-4493-8b7f-e718e1d03d3e
uuid:cd8b34bd-8f59-4225-8009-9fe43aa37b1d
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
[33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(97122315)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/97122315.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:37:44 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 759.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 758.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 675.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 675 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 674.2503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 675 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Andrews Van Lines, Inc.)Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(DATE: January 12, 1998)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 97122315)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGESTS)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. The two-year statute of limitations in the Military Personnel and Civ\
ilian Employees Claim Act,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.798 0 Td
(31 U.S.C. \247 3721, is)Tj
-39.798 -1.125 Td
(designed to limit the government's exposure under that Act. )Tj
24.119 0 Td
(There is no legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.942 0 Td
(authority which suggests that the two-year)Tj
-31.061 -1.125 Td
(limit in this Act was also intended to protect third-party)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.496 0 Td
(non-governmental entities, like a household good motor carrier,)Tj
-22.496 -1.125 Td
(which became liable to the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.968 0 Td
(government in subrogation after a government agency decides that the ser\
vice member's)Tj
-10.968 -1.125 Td
(claim)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
2.471 0 Td
(against the government is still timely and it pays the service member's \
claim for transit damage by a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.225 0 Td
(carrier.)Tj
-42.696 -2.125 Td
(2. Replacement costs are generally favored in determining the carrier's \
liability to the government in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.388 0 Td
(subrogation for)Tj
-40.388 -1.125 Td
(transit damage to a service member's household goods. )Tj
22.258 0 Td
(As an exception, repair)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.524 0 Td
(costs are applied when they result in less)Tj
-31.782 -1.125 Td
(carrier liability. )Tj
6.469 0 Td
(In some instances, other measures like)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.634 0 Td
(actual cash value estimated through the Table of Adjusted Dollar)Tj
-22.104 -1.125 Td
(Value, may be reasonable. )Tj
10.829 0 Td
(However, the carrier's opportunity to require support for the loss or da\
mage claimed is within)Tj
-10.829 -1.125 Td
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(120-day period of claim settlement following the presentation of the cla\
im against the carrier, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.847 0 Td
(when the carrier)Tj
-40.847 -1.125 Td
(does not question the calculation of damages within that period of time,\
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.381 0 Td
(government will maintain its burden of)Tj
-30.381 -1.125 Td
(proof for purposes of a )Tj
(prima)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 128.9687 394.5 cm
0 0 m
27.99 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 156.959 395.25 Tm
( )Tj
(facie)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 159.959 394.5 cm
0 0 m
23.309 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 183.2676 395.25 Tm
( case of liability against)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.747 0 Td
(the carrier when it uses any reasonable method of calculating)Tj
-23.686 -1.125 Td
(damages.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Andrews Van Lines, Inc. \(Andrews\), appeals the March 27, 1997, Settlem\
ent Certificate of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.183 0 Td
(Defense Office of)Tj
-38.183 -1.125 Td
(Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in Claim No. 97020313. )Tj
(In the Settlement, this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.856 0 Td
(Office affirmed the Army's set off of)Tj
-31.856 -1.375 Td
($1,945 against Andrews for transit loss and damage to a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.689 0 Td
(shipment of a service member's household goods.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 526.7207 305.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 526.7207 304.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 275.25 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record shows that the shipment was picked up in Alexandria, Virginia\
, on April 24, 1990, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.575 0 Td
(placed into non-)Tj
-39.575 -1.125 Td
(temporary storage \(NTS\) in Baltimore, Maryland. )Tj
20.217 0 Td
(The PPGBL indicates that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.721 0 Td
(Andrews obtained the shipment from the)Tj
-30.937 -1.125 Td
(NTS facility on July 15, 1992, and delivered it in Colorado,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.107 0 Td
(on August 3, 1992.)Tj
-24.107 -2.125 Td
(Andrews argued that it was not liable for the loss and damage because th\
e service member had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.125 0 Td
(filed his claim more than)Tj
-38.125 -1.125 Td
(2 years after delivery, and therefore, "over the two year limit per Titl\
e 31)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.452 0 Td
(US Code Sections 240-243.")Tj
-29.452 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, Andrews also argues that it was not provided a copy of the go\
vernment inspection)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.685 0 Td
(report, which was)Tj
-37.685 -1.125 Td
(conducted more than two years after delivery, and therefore it did not h\
ave an)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.349 0 Td
(accurate account of the damage. )Tj
13.104 0 Td
(It argues)Tj
-44.452 -1.375 Td
(that it has no damage estimate for the dining table)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.216 0 Td
(\(Descriptive Inventory Item 11 and 12\))Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 446.8691 132.75 Tm
(\(2\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 446.8691 132 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 458.2378 128.25 Tm
( and chairs and that the)Tj
-36.853 -1.125 Td
(government failed to offer)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.773 0 Td
(sufficient proof on the amount of damages; therefore, the government fai\
led to present a)Tj
-10.773 -1.125 Td
(primafacie)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 100.5 cm
0 0 m
51.299 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
/Span<>> BDC
12 0 0 12 67.2988 101.25 Tm
( )Tj
EMC
(case of liability against it. )Tj
10.803 0 Td
(It states that the only estimate it received is one dated May 17, 1994 \(\
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.27 0 Td
(Brooks)Tj
-44.347 -1.125 Td
(estimate\). )Tj
4.165 0 Td
(Andrews also believes that the Settlement was in error because the adjud\
icators)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.045 0 Td
(did not consider the damage it)Tj
-36.21 -1.125 Td
(noted on the rider it created when it obtained the shipment at the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.02 0 Td
(NTS facility. )Tj
5.471 0 Td
(While it did not specify any such items in)Tj
-31.491 -1.375 Td
(its original claim before the General)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.716 0 Td
(Accounting Office,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 285.2266 62.25 Tm
(\(3\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 285.2266 61.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 296.5952 57.75 Tm
( in this appeal it itemizes the following items from the)Tj
-23.383 -1.125 Td
(Descriptive Inventory: 6,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.275 0 Td
(19, 20, 26, 27 and 29, all Dining chairs. )Tj
16.109 0 Td
(Andrews argues that it excepted to the receipt of all of)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
(6c\n)
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p ^(GԸh4&K<1YƍQ7
P9xFH}""x'7ވ(̈+ʸjM20=jS]B:$Der*$*&9:ſ ˍjH2~o2(m@a;J'h08.:a>
,z1=o$ǭDKSDy6K8*qbU]1zk