%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:37:49-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:49-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:49-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98021008
uuid:32b53adf-2ffc-45d9-847b-5f0c12032c10
uuid:eb2629f3-c9dc-40ba-a6d6-e6e11e3bbfda
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98021008)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/98021008.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:37:49 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 759.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 758.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 675.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 675 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 674.2503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 675 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(American Van Services, Inc.)Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(DATE: February 27, 1998)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 98021008)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(1. The government does not present sufficient evidence concerning the am\
ount of damages owed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.07 0 Td
(by the carrier for the)Tj
-39.07 -1.125 Td
(loss of a service member's carpet in transit when the record only establ\
ishes)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.532 0 Td
(the original purchase price and does not)Tj
-30.532 -1.125 Td
(indicate whether the carpet lost was similar to the one upon)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.021 0 Td
(which the estimate was based.)Tj
-24.021 -2.125 Td
(2. Generally, we will not review a claim based on a theory of recovery w\
hich was not raised by the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.82 0 Td
(claimant until)Tj
-39.82 -1.125 Td
(appeal.)Tj
T*
(3. We will not question an agency's calculation of the value of the dama\
ges or relevant replacement)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.054 0 Td
(costs for transit loss)Tj
-40.054 -1.125 Td
(or damage unless the carrier presents clear and convincing evidence of t\
he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.987 0 Td
(agency's unreasonableness, especially when)Tj
-29.987 -1.125 Td
(the amounts involved are small, the damaged items are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.215 0 Td
(available for inspection and salvage, and the carrier offers no)Tj
-22.215 -1.125 Td
(contrary evidence of value.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(American Van Services, Inc. \(American\) appeals the January 6, 1998, Se\
ttlement Certificate of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.763 0 Td
(Defense Office of)Tj
-39.763 -1.125 Td
(Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in Claim No. 97092511. )Tj
(In the Settlement, this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.856 0 Td
(Office affirmed the Air Force's set off of)Tj
-31.856 -1.375 Td
($203.23 \(except for a $33 refund\) for transit loss and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.411 0 Td
(damage to the shipment of a service member's household goods.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 581.6816 347.25 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 581.6816 346.5 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 317.25 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(The record shows that American picked up the shipment at Robins Air Forc\
e Base, Georgia, on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.435 0 Td
(June 15, 1993, and)Tj
-38.435 -1.125 Td
(delivered it in Wichita, Kansas, on July 15, 1993. )Tj
20.024 0 Td
(A Notice of Loss or Damage)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.774 0 Td
(\(DD Form 1840R\) was dispatched on)Tj
-31.798 -1.125 Td
(August 27, 1993, but the Air Force did not dispatch its claim)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.553 0 Td
(to American until February 8, 1995, and American settled)Tj
-24.553 -1.125 Td
(the claim in a letter dated February 17,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.744 0 Td
(1995. )Tj
(American did not inspect the damage, and the Air Force did not inspect)Tj
-15.744 -1.125 Td
(until January 24,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.943 0 Td
(1995. )Tj
(American reclaims amounts set off by the Air Force for the following ite\
ms.)Tj
-6.943 -2.125 Td
(Item 166 is described on the Descriptive Inventory as a "child rocker" w\
ith pre-existing damage)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.61 0 Td
(\(PED\). )Tj
(The PED)Tj
-38.61 -1.125 Td
(involved scratches on the bottom left side, scratched left and right leg\
s, and a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.102 0 Td
(loose and dented right arm. )Tj
11.164 0 Td
(The chair was)Tj
-42.265 -1.125 Td
(reported as broken on the DD Form 1840R, and the List)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.663 0 Td
(of Property and Claims Analysis Chart \(AF Form 180\))Tj
-22.663 -1.125 Td
(described the additional damage as including)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.272 0 Td
(a broken back and arm joints which came apart. )Tj
19.381 0 Td
(The Air Force's inspector)Tj
-37.653 -1.125 Td
(stated that the item was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.636 0 Td
(pulled apart at the joints. )Tj
10.164 0 Td
(The AF Form 180 indicates that the shipper purchased the chair in)Tj
-19.8 -1.125 Td
(December 1989 for $40; the replacement cost was $50; the depreciated rep\
lacement cost charged)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.094 0 Td
(to American was)Tj
-39.094 -1.125 Td
($39.50; and the Air Force had applied a 15 percent depreciation rate to \
cover the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.487 0 Td
(period from purchase to shipment. )Tj
13.997 0 Td
(On)Tj
-46.484 -1.125 Td
(appeal, American contends that the proper rate of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.019 0 Td
(depreciation was 20 percent per year. )Tj
15.187 0 Td
(During the adjudication period,)Tj
-35.206 -1.125 Td
(American had argued it had)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.356 0 Td
(the right to accelerate depreciation to maximum depreciation rate of 80 \
percent due to PED.)Tj
-11.356 -2.125 Td
(Item 181 was described on the Descriptive Inventory as a "large rug" whi\
ch had pre-existing soil)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.972 0 Td
(marks and a torn edge.)Tj
-38.972 -1.125 Td
(It was reported as missing on the DD Form 1840R, and the AF Form 180)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.553 0 Td
(described the carpet as 21.33 square yards \(12')Tj
-29.553 -1.125 Td
(X 16'\), purchased in December 1990 for $200, with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.869 0 Td
(a replacement cost of $316.24. )Tj
12.523 0 Td
(The associated estimate merely)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(indicated that the cost of replacing)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.05 0 Td
(21.33 yards at $14 per yard was $298.62 plus $17.62 in sales tax. )Tj
26.357 0 Td
(The associated)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(5ȦGHLM}˨)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p ^(GԸj4&K<1YƍQ7AP9xFH"^9x߷"*̈+jM2?~~ >Ȁh4oXĥĦ@@i.Vf S1 }
]VAc<b,;Z$ \
JI}ܦ
B
|*yh\4vPhz۔ѩ
x |0$6%^ɿB
Qz{"
e+"AOFt7u /BЫGgrIήZg@.K6oCQk
~GABFj49_ĠYW? Nz5l05M/[|UwѦ{-v;t.]?'ӞQgy//G⫸
NLJN24ui_5zqߌ1I}?yԬisfΜ5{ܼy`%K-_ry6nڼe;vڽg:J8Yz
=wKqbVuLhUpL Ơ J=QR%MJ3B\'Y@~ʍإKoBCQ.JG|W)yŢ