%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-06-11T15:38-04:00
2021-06-11T15:37:59-04:00
2021-06-11T15:38-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
98051109
uuid:7ca6b55b-e9c9-491f-8b7d-1d4e71b68804
uuid:7af972a7-16d3-4bc9-9f67-9a4416625eb9
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
[29 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(98051109)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(r/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/claims/transportation/Ar\
chived%20-%20HTML/98051109.html)Tj
49.712 0 Td
([6/11/2021 3:38:00 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 759.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 758.25 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 758.9997 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.751 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 675.7497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 675 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 674.2503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 675 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(American International Moving, Corp.)Tj
T*
(Claimant)Tj
0 -2.75 TD
(DATE: May 29, 1998)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Claims Case No. 98051109)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.224 -2.125 Td
(CLAIMS APPEALS BOARD DECISION)Tj
-15.224 -2.125 Td
(DIGEST)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(Where the record shows the existence of pre-existing damage, and lacks e\
vidence of greater or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.094 0 Td
(different damage, the)Tj
-38.094 -1.125 Td
(common carrier is not liable for damage in transit.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(DECISION)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
T*
(American International Moving, Corp. \(American\), appeals the May 1, 19\
98, Settlement Certificate)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.126 0 Td
(of the Defense)Tj
-40.126 -1.125 Td
(Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) in DOHA Claim No. 98031210, whic\
h)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(disallowed American's claim for a)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(refund of the $190 offset by the Air Force for transit loss and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.688 0 Td
(damage to the household goods of a service member.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 567.1855 465.75 Tm
(\(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 567.1855 465 cm
0 0 m
11.369 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
/TT1 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 274.1992 435.75 Tm
(Background)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.517 -2.125 Td
(American picked up the shipment from a nontemporary storage \(NTS\) faci\
lity in California in April)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.239 0 Td
(1994, and delivered)Tj
-40.239 -1.125 Td
(it to the service member in Alabama on August 29, 1994. )Tj
23.189 0 Td
(On appeal, American)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.774 0 Td
(continues to deny liability \($65\) for the)Tj
-31.963 -1.125 Td
(repair of a coffee table, Descriptive Inventory Item 10, and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.823 0 Td
(for 50 percent \($50 of the $100 total repair cost\) of the repair)Tj
-23.823 -1.125 Td
(of four doors of a wall unit, Items 44)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.997 0 Td
(through 47.)Tj
-14.997 -2.125 Td
(At delivery, the service member and the carrier's representative noted o\
n the Joint Statement of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.277 0 Td
(Loss or Damage at)Tj
-38.277 -1.125 Td
(Delivery \(DD Form 1840\) that Descriptive Inventory Item 10, a coffee t\
able,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.99 0 Td
(was scratched. )Tj
(The NTS contractor had)Tj
-30.99 -1.125 Td
(previously noted that the top, side and edges of the table)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.772 0 Td
(were gouged and the top and legs were scratched. )Tj
20.103 0 Td
(In the Notice)Tj
-42.875 -1.125 Td
(of Loss or Damage \(DD Form)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1840R\), dispatched on October 26, 1994, the shipper noted scratches on \
the surface.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The shipper and the carrier's representative also noted at delivery that\
there were deep scratches)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.523 0 Td
(on the wall unit doors.)Tj
-38.523 -1.125 Td
(The Descriptive Inventory for Items 44 through 47, the doors involved, d\
id)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.271 0 Td
(not note any pre-existing damage to the wall)Tj
-30.271 -1.125 Td
(unit doors.)Tj
T*
(On July 13, 1995, the repairer described the four wall unit doors as den\
ted and marred, and he)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.85 0 Td
(described the coffee table)Tj
-37.85 -1.125 Td
(as "top surface badly scratched and dented.")Tj
T*
(On August 31, 1995, Air Force inspectors looked at the damaged items. )Tj
28.967 0 Td
(They found a deep scratch)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.801 0 Td
(on the edge of the)Tj
-39.768 -1.125 Td
(coffee table, but they found that the mark was new damage even though th\
e)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.517 0 Td
(mark appeared to be pre-existing because)Tj
-30.517 -1.125 Td
(the member's spouse had attempted to color it to hide it. )Tj
22.62 0 Td
(While the inventory had listed scratches and gouges on top, the)Tj
-22.62 -1.125 Td
(inspectors stated that they were)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.801 0 Td
(unable to find such damage when they inspected it. )Tj
20.716 0 Td
(The inspectors also noted that four)Tj
-33.518 -1.125 Td
(doors of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(solid oak wall unit were scratched and marred.)Tj
T*
(American denies liability for the coffee table because the damage was pr\
e-existing damage \(PED\). )Tj
39.678 0 Td
(American points to)Tj
-39.678 -1.125 Td
(the discrepancies in the damage descriptions between the Air Force inspe\
ctors)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.517 0 Td
(and the repairer. )Tj
6.774 0 Td
(American argues that)Tj
-38.291 -1.125 Td
(the repairer referred to dents while the inspectors found)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.463 0 Td
(scratches. )Tj
(American contends that the deep scratch the)Tj
-22.463 -1.125 Td
(inspectors found on the edge was the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.024 0 Td
(gouged edge that existed when the member tendered the table to the NTS f\
acility.)Tj
-15.024 -1.125 Td
(With respect to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.359 0 Td
(the wall unit doors, American notes that only scratches were noted at de\
livery in 1994, but the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.906 0 Td
(repairer)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(described the damage in 1995 as dented and marred. )Tj
21.214 0 Td
(American did not conduct its own)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.831 0 Td
(inspection of the damage.)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(WA'e1&!)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
COkgXr t1NzϊJ3$%CrTVvD~5NvxvV$)NO}Dyl;<#lalE
^aUks?أ m8qM-iʄn7!/svNXFGh0
a>qڥߍyJq&8eN[X2K9#3K|$>1A8#G$$;HrPYq1ja7En=y*vSM[>d|WFwe\0Q҇3ZzI],>^,į W.
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|y\TG5o^p fQѬ,d57FADTE#7x!(xⅨx1#!~4?~~ ^ >k*p\\a
MIm;)"z#i7]Կ
ǧJn;P}IvZ&|XO&Ab}BMHNc>n#M
ل.9ftjl0IK2kлJMa:5:<.UD_$)QSzyZDlE~倨|;0.~P!ICSR
Qnj '};9L6}Y̝7AEtY+W^ּn}icA[n۾cgѮ{+ );zxNWTs/\+W-kUסPurj)D%ҥLiT!=zi{-(y<]-O1;u}zgPbАAA?) SU+_*JrN(00̐iXjoxb`la\`\gҘm53SSۦS\&'ĨBը6Pjs]5BMR'Tu:O]nT{bT=VWԻaa:EņŇ
Kil4O1
q?6{{{'vgMlյOkk!4GYYbOi1ji
P)R+eN*Rzߑ14y