%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:07-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:06-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:07-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0077.a1
uuid:a5e0ae95-012b-4fc1-964b-3bc73712c630
uuid:65329493-fc95-4590-b09c-549b92efe298
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0077.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0077.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:06 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 5, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0077)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision dated July 28, \
2000, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.25 0 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for\
Applicant. )Tj
32.266 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(The)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.303 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision for the reasons explained below.)Tj
-7.303 -2.125 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6, dated)Tj
T*
(January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: Was the Administrative \
Judge's decision arbitrary, capricious and)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law?)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated March 3, 2000.)Tj
T*
(The SOR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(was based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), Guideline E \(Per\
sonal Conduct\) and Guideline J)Tj
T*
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant declined a hearing. )Tj
12.023 0 Td
(Department Counsel prepared a File of Relevant Material \(FORM\). )Tj
27.27 0 Td
(Applicant replied to)Tj
-39.293 -1.125 Td
(the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(FORM. )Tj
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated July 28, 2000,\
in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.749 0 Td
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
28.766 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.066 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
10.354 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Applicant offers new evidence on appeal and seeks to have the Board: \(1\
\) conduct a )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
33.848 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( review of that new)Tj
-33.848 -1.125 Td
(evidence and the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.969 0 Td
(record evidence before the Administrative Judge; and \(2\) reach favorab\
le conclusions about his)Tj
-6.969 -1.125 Td
(security eligibility under Guideline)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.274 0 Td
(F. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, Applicant's appeal fails to demonstrate the\
Judge)Tj
-14.274 -1.125 Td
(erred.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(L`;C\nS8)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <""M]+-p2!T4Ke
6?wϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6=i71;?8PAۂƑH*geNS@#9>(qRavB&*ĕeh|STèe`NUE!39SSKKka-;EZQk4I^!}X/;J
0 N{
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgv΅h
ݻp7!ĘH(jT(Xvذ]D]¾%Ι{;? P $%7&naqY` 1 Mr qBh~p (YLTx4/cm]x1q Y+]/4hkx(.<1m>sz5㢂^X N1:@N}=~TTf{% 4 Z\R6D+\QP($v!q b3ZȨ~ZXX^@#@O|ppsxW^LGQTn
]\6lܤi3Zhu^>-Zطuwةst4{z,/ͷ8য়àȨ1C>"~ 8n_'N4巩ӦHK9+cv朹/X(kXl윕VYkX~Fڴymwܵ;o} ].K쥕AVueg]r+ Ir*ϔ9&y/I|U{h0V}=|{C19ZVk5Vm՞l([țBh<%sʨg!B[.f s2RCXUu:[L4RC$JKuRhM&S96T|shS!9dJ9+CC90_4xtTCjcnVhiSsW!?x{%j^|ւ+ 0P?TUb~N*--,~v6֖-,-->Ep,ו/4/44W=#͡