%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:19-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:18-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:19-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0291.a1
uuid:47283e53-052c-4ec2-a8d8-91883ad3eefd
uuid:5f36361a-2295-4dc7-921c-51dcf5351ffa
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[23 0 R 23 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 21 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0291.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0291.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:18 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 13, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0291)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.054 -2.2 Td
(Martin H. Mogul, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.832 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.236 -2.2 Td
(Douglas G. Andrews, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a decision, dated March 7, 2\
001, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge's )Tj
35.436 0 Td
(adverse conclusions are)Tj
-35.436 -1.125 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law; and \(2\) whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.796 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge erred by considering an Adjudicative)Tj
-22.796 -1.125 Td
(Guideline that was not alleged in the Statement of Reasons issued to App\
licant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated October 17, 2000 to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline E)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.636 0 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
8.249 0 Td
(A hearing was held on January 25, 2001. )Tj
16.607 0 Td
(The)Tj
-43.936 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated March 7, 2001, in \
which he concluded it is not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
40.492 0 Td
(clearly consistent)Tj
-40.492 -1.125 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for\
Applicant. )Tj
32.266 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on)Tj
-32.266 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal from the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.44 0 Td
(adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.785 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's adverse conclusions are arbitrary, ca\
pricious, or contrary to law)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 28 144 cm
0 0 m
479.994 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 507.9941 144.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(The)Tj
-41 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge made findings of fact about Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.841 0 Td
(termination from a position as a safety and security officer)Tj
-24.841 -1.125 Td
(with a hospital in October 1997 based on his unauthorized accessing of p\
atient records on a hospital computer)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.266 0 Td
(system on)Tj
-44.266 -1.125 Td
(approximately 10-20 occasions. )Tj
12.997 0 Td
(The Judge concluded Applicant's unauthorized accessing of patient record\
s)Tj
-12.997 -1.125 Td
(demonstrated questionable judgment,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.219 0 Td
(untrustworthiness, and unreliability, and warranted an adverse security \
clearance)Tj
-15.219 -1.125 Td
(because Applicant failed to demonstrate rehabilitation.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(On appeal, Applicant indicates that he accepts the Administrative Judge'\
s findings of fact, )Tj
36.197 0 Td
(but challenges the Judge's)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(adverse conclusions. )Tj
8.525 0 Td
(In challenging the Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.622 0 Td
(adverse conclusions, Applicant argues: \(a\) the Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
(y_¿}~5)
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0E
-EpDLYA~cORC#YRA-mhzǶioMK3mTm7|Sٙ,%^OphMQ#xuGZck{u?z۱],l{-Oj!my_G)/ک͇2U[++e8)YbP;N?Te4E8-MNK✜)xFف,`O9y~"?%xE^5xCNnnnnnn>>¾} xAA/BOS)t nnnnn