%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:21-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:20-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:21-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0311.a1
uuid:6502c5a0-66a8-47c8-9513-9df5198526f6
uuid:92500d88-f2da-45df-8a84-3fecc5a687ce
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0311.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0311.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:21 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: March 8, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0311)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Robert R. Gales issued a decision, dated December 8\
, 2000, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for Applicant. )Tj
36.515 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\),)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.886 0 Td
(dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-4.886 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's security clearance decision is arbitrary,)Tj
T*
(capricious, or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
5.692 0 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
14.34 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated July 24, 2000 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(was based on Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR. )Tj
17.608 0 Td
(A File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared and a copy was given t\
o)Tj
-17.608 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(Applicant submitted a response to the FORM. )Tj
18.665 0 Td
(The case was then assigned to an Administrative Judge for)Tj
-23.108 -1.125 Td
(disposition.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated December 8, 20\
00, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.25 0 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for\
Applicant. )Tj
32.266 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(appeal from the Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.419 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findi\
ngs about her use of marijuana in the 1970s)Tj
T*
(and her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(renewed use of marijuana in the 1990s \(on at least three occasions, wit\
h the last use occurring in February)Tj
T*
(1999\). )Tj
(However,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Applicant makes several arguments that challenge the Judge's adverse con\
clusions.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal arguments highlight some passages of the Administrati\
ve Judge's decision that, when viewed in)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(2{/:ΑNz)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
32 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTg{/6,]k
c4<}D@, ,ł.b
ETkUY}|ߜ9sf{@ @uo);V.aq+
nffD
V*ŠqQY<ώd@<_hQ[3?YPT_nчBsal8^(뇅F=
߲ 7|T=@rȸsNpiD $.1APEAВFebס3Yy7 z[qhYwp_ `W (*H|ŃWX}dP;$T\j5W5jzzժ][>^
5įIf[lպMv:t4S.]u=ˠ7_BB``xDdԠC7bF;n~8)aωSN<#esRΛ/Y
˖XjuYiMlݶ}]ݷ@NC/8vDSْs/\W,֫k+'UNA/6D3h&UaAb"NgsB7D7TwDWszO^TnJoO|lWŢ>TAZWU- 5FMPILuJݠnU