%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:25-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:25-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:25-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0345.a1
uuid:207ac499-395f-4a62-ba28-fb91449fb80d
uuid:5ccae560-e55c-44bf-90fd-547e238dfccb
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0345.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0345.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:25 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 12, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0345)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision, dated July 25,\
2001, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.22 0 Td
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.522 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-18.522 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(1992, as amended.)Tj
-11.662 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
T*
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.216 0 Td
(to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.816 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 11,)Tj
T*
(2000. )Tj
(The SOR was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(based on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\), Guideline E \(Persona\
l Conduct\), and Guideline J)Tj
T*
(\(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the answer and elected to have a decisi\
on made in his case without a hearing. )Tj
44.791 0 Td
(A File)Tj
-44.791 -1.125 Td
(of Relevant Material)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.524 0 Td
(\(FORM\) was prepared and a copy provided to Applicant. )Tj
23.161 0 Td
(No response to the FORM was received)Tj
-31.685 -1.125 Td
(from Applicant. )Tj
6.637 0 Td
(The case was then)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.552 0 Td
(assigned to an Administrative Judge for determination.)Tj
-14.189 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated July 25, 2001.\
)Tj
29.328 0 Td
(In that decision, the Judge entered formal)Tj
-29.328 -1.125 Td
(findings in favor of Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.192 0 Td
(with respect to Guideline E and Guideline J, but entered formal findings\
against)Tj
-12.192 -1.125 Td
(Applicant with respect to Guideline F and concluded it is not clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.604 0 Td
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
-27.604 -1.125 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.534 0 Td
(from the Judge's adverse)Tj
-38.22 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
($[sCR|˂F)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CR =@j+]`q~$K+ccw?kW}:W*U:ӪZϟ84%C\3ׁO'"LcLF(12H>`.K2|=Ѓ<3ӣTG&C̵PZeUJfE6AS=G
w
` E
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=ņ;^w`I,ŗDMXQ,%*FTv4Ŋbr*F<5}z+9kggϚoo"#k+WBãbP 6| GBp=]w=2q[}E
wk,o̡=""%>^rh2n/cу&-$@}g~aܱ%0G
)1Sx[|K߰
21+(N~̀Ș5w@ʁ>%BSk*-'#J"UQTVjbqE0۵ș%:%5v Pƍ W
|*-H~1E!7YnɣP"Ey*]Ti2e˕5PR*U?VFZԭWAF44Y-[_|ٶ]_:u]CB-<"2{z/~R_{oyy^R[oNz}E?SkL̷dXr]c Y֕6f+fJ*60[g5`(Fa6|Qըc}X#Έ7&3Zcn2'3U~@`@P@ЀVZk)i)yk"_UUjjj6/$+PJge=s08a
/L~-`I
S'ijɡA\3̱dsGmBX}~X_ן,DYY-ɒ!8k%26{ClpErhCd@/!Nħ^SCr@rrpεsȓwU))O]ܞ㕜UJ--ĭ̷'Ϟmˁ7twuvrtpVw~p|+pcYd% Y+wn"YAYzڎJA'l~~;-a{}=Mٗ7[ٛۛ6n%eFMɑy5_-u>=SyVB^@TRjWTWd`yA{-jlZmr