|Ywg*CVjᏪ*ATF)E?Hm*Ҡ*?Q !;sg6?jTin7?fvn6]ɛG3uI+nӋޟ?U|[YCq}~8 ~7> :4+u{f;"ȋߕ*1rAޔ|}Ep
q r_]{z ^lXGN"ԱWjo T.Akp tqG'u<%_rQb?(g~ֽy<='owxMcx! r,q(s3{7yËu:?L7\ZTa
.b<c܇~wIԊf)ޕw pPǯrϸ7<+۸cF{Sޑ4s7i=J+`2poYyHĚ ظ{W|^1_GGiGĝ
yɹ;ַܐq>F(n:iqF-fCl^R#~-߃5<A &^7?9)ܙa&u|9wJ;l661C]V* R}]P(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP()4" }L+5NTC72P&Ao"e" څ&ˤ<# i6o &"l>{Ԍ<,5fnu^6P87S6凌9%<擳'ji !N=@n8Y
"
>*5L1هƬ/m퓑+,g)DDAx+<(j oS{ *'©h7b-'mNIr"4[ g74>{) vÅZ[± wv]Fbh>i;-hW8Ƴ#B'Ay2>r S GO ?ֶ.?,INv'q"<'ٕ'ƒ7vliZ smp-UkSahͲHNxg/И&QOm[HyxlN旒ދ17@[ %&z4[_d/
;w>_s>K߲pF|h0<96>z2]:%_bt f fIg0=A>(J?^"{[ZehEuy[@gcgzW[ P{4r 'YP:^Xabo}_As1B&6bvt.02+ vX~? j|ߐ1ч!w#d{N+Nsn{ﰗb1!>^b E <e.ezAF{} 4>ЇO}<hΰor/fm( Wۏ(&:!Fd:CX|!7>c f5Cxڞ :RڲEt]$Tql$۽og>gA믰1 _e7֏O 2Z֜E
lOO<ϥP'&{Oo>^J|u99zwث ~ޱ ~h1_UM4^dKQ&2.K+m;m,+ndC$ Y y ]lMO[B4XER-إ~6DqyvYֲv=ƿyց !P U|o ևe8̆Yvqh bjX:ADz\j6,
ci ),⫠i5]LH}@:#YZgiT4](O)q
5O/ ZLdZ4͗fO4ۃfk\ 4˃fsT%"W2,šܼ n{anvr)n6J FtH('UGLv&?m7NI3̎!qŴf> jme! Z$v1i!"(PBF˝I-oGsgiTD_߽9wٽބg殶 .?f[E 5?c}R* z]n!!N;1CWbk%BYkB/i }{n ߉s6BE L
"Ʌ\g zr)b
łXln!K$XϲoD1L0f?Y Տ-V.žw^a_[DMOd~KP#W^Kc_2%8̰^Kj[l 5fjکjFUI%j_d.eGY̳0Fxo'y
Di mw { QO=ţ{ f$so7*<❨h %' m MuFK+˾O^(jDϡ? iצ
Z.4} 8]ߐꆴ7蔴 G;dPP ^LeDGTͤ2 #l0!ct
ePfBV#ƄF'Є| 4Y-4Y6!1M8&Ja9, H饔^;t!Sz hjWK*;VTR'O7;?!mߐ.FwR,jv>zL7πMCŁ2#Gy7wh)(gvyO. $k-* Hu
p=? T
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0378.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0378.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(despite asserting on three separate occasions \(in January 2000, July 20\
00, and November 2000\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
38.434 0 Td
(that she would contact)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741 Tm
(her creditors and work out payment arrangements to satisfy her debts.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate extenuation or mitigation that overc\
omes the security concerns raised by her history)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of financial difficulties. )Tj
9.663 0 Td
(Applicant's history of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.874 0 Td
(financial difficulties warrants an adverse formal finding with respect t\
o)Tj
-18.537 -1.125 Td
(Guideline F.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant did not intend to deceive or mislead the government about her \
financial situation when she omitted certain)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(information from a security questionnaire she)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.495 0 Td
(completed in August 1999. )Tj
11.082 0 Td
(Applicant's omission was unintentional or the)Tj
-29.577 -1.125 Td
(result of careless oversight. )Tj
11.191 0 Td
(Accordingly, formal findings in favor of Applicant are warranted)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.324 0 Td
(with respect to Guideline)Tj
-37.515 -1.125 Td
(E and Guideline J.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Based on Applicant's history of financial difficulties, it is not clearl\
y consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(continue a security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
21.225 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge's favorable findings and conclusions concerning\
Guideline E and Guideline J are not at issue)Tj
T*
(on appeal. )Tj
4.359 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board need not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.33 0 Td
(address those findings and conclusions in order to decide this appeal.)Tj
-17.689 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, Applicant makes several arguments. )Tj
19.327 0 Td
(Two of Applicant's arguments raise the issue of whether the)Tj
-19.327 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.675 0 Td
(substantial record evidence. )Tj
11.384 0 Td
(Applicant's other arguments raise)Tj
-34.06 -1.125 Td
(the issue of whether the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearan\
ce decision is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.943 0 Td
(or contrary)Tj
-42.943 -1.125 Td
(to law. )Tj
(The Board will address Applicant's arguments in turn.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported by sub\
stantial record evidence)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 426.75 cm
0 0 m
464.684 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 492.6836 427.5 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant argues:)Tj
-39.724 -1.125 Td
(\(a\) the SOR was incorrect because some medical)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.826 0 Td
(bills were listed as credit card accounts, and some of the credit card)Tj
-19.826 -1.125 Td
(bills had been paid in full; and \(b\) she believes there are some mista\
kes on her credit report. )Tj
36.96 0 Td
(For the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(reasons that follow,)Tj
-36.96 -1.125 Td
(the Board concludes Applicant has failed to demonstrate the Administrati\
ve Judge's findings of fact about her history of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(financial difficulties are)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.801 0 Td
(erroneous.)Tj
-9.801 -2.125 Td
(\(a\) Applicant is correct that SOR paragraph 1.f. incorrectly character\
ized the debt as "a delinquent credit card debt.")Tj
T*
(However, at the hearing, Department Counsel)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.605 0 Td
(moved to amend )Tj
6.915 0 Td
(SOR paragraph 1.f. to conform to the evidence that)Tj
-25.52 -1.125 Td
(showed the debt was actually a medical bill. )Tj
17.911 0 Td
(Furthermore, the Administrative Judge correctly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.605 0 Td
(characterized that debt in)Tj
-37.517 -1.125 Td
(his findings of fact as a medical debt, not a credit card debt. )Tj
24.13 0 Td
(Therefore, Applicant suffered no prejudicial harm by the)Tj
-24.13 -1.125 Td
(mistake in the SOR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.055 0 Td
(concerning this debt.)Tj
-8.055 -2.125 Td
(Applicant presented evidence that she had paid the debts covered by SOR \
paragraphs 1.a. and 1.h. )Tj
39.543 0 Td
(The Administrative)Tj
-39.543 -1.125 Td
(Judge found Applicant's evidence to be)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.954 0 Td
(persuasive and concluded she had satisfied those two debts. )Tj
24.105 0 Td
(Therefore,)Tj
-40.059 -1.125 Td
(Applicant suffered no prejudicial harm by the inclusion of those two deb\
ts in the SOR.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant does not challenge the Administrative Judge's findings of fact\
concerning the rest of the debts covered by the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(SOR. )Tj
(Accordingly, the Board need not address)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.024 0 Td
(those findings of fact.)Tj
-19.024 -2.125 Td
(\(b\) Attached to Applicant's appeal brief are copies of two documents t\
hat discuss the subject of mistakes in credit)Tj
T*
(reports. )Tj
(Those two documents constitute new)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.357 0 Td
(evidence, which the Board cannot consider on appeal. )Tj
21.825 0 Td
(Directive,)Tj
-40.183 -1.125 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.29.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(At the hearing, Applicant had the opportunity to present evidence concer\
ning the debts alleged in the SOR for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consideration by the Administrative Judge. )Tj
17.441 0 Td
(Apart from the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.192 0 Td
(debts covered by SOR paragraphs 1.a. and 1.h., Applicant)Tj
-23.633 -1.125 Td
(essentially conceded that she owed the debts covered by SOR paragraphs 1\
.b. through 1.g. )Tj
36.435 0 Td
(The Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(findings about)Tj
-36.435 -1.125 Td
(the debts covered by SOR paragraphs 1.b. through 1.g. are supported by t\
he record evidence as a whole \(including)Tj
T*
(Applicant's admissions\). )Tj
10.041 0 Td
(Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(unsubstantiated claim that there might be mistakes on her credit report \
falls far)Tj
-10.041 -1.125 Td
(short of demonstrating any error by the Judge with respect to his findin\
gs of fact about)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
34.881 0 Td
(Applicant's delinquent debts.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
46 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
48 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/00-0378.a1.html)
endobj
47 0 obj
<>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 50
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003644 00000 n
0000161385 00000 n
0000003535 00000 n
0000003577 00000 n
0000003717 00000 n
0000003744 00000 n
0000160944 00000 n
0000160985 00000 n
0000160756 00000 n
0000004380 00000 n
0000153315 00000 n
0000117480 00000 n
0000116171 00000 n
0000003847 00000 n
0000003893 00000 n
0000003942 00000 n
0000004133 00000 n
0000004005 00000 n
0000004037 00000 n
0000004069 00000 n
0000004101 00000 n
0000004591 00000 n
0000009906 00000 n
0000009955 00000 n
0000009990 00000 n
0000010496 00000 n
0000010937 00000 n
0000063666 00000 n
0000063933 00000 n
0000030062 00000 n
0000030335 00000 n
0000011306 00000 n
0000011587 00000 n
0000011913 00000 n
0000030803 00000 n
0000064541 00000 n
0000116360 00000 n
0000117691 00000 n
0000126229 00000 n
0000126652 00000 n
0000126928 00000 n
0000127357 00000 n
0000153515 00000 n
0000160841 00000 n
0000161192 00000 n
0000161027 00000 n
0000161332 00000 n
trailer
<<356014BEF0962540A912BD15E09935A8>]>>
startxref
161557
%%EOF