%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:32-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:31-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:32-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0417.a1
uuid:53426f74-ddb6-4faf-a8fe-85bac9a3f247
uuid:b16e3988-e65a-42f7-aadd-35b4b7f8b3a0
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0417.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0417.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:31 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: May 1, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0417)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Paul J. Mason issued a decision, dated January 10, \
2001, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's adverse security clearance decision is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated August 25, 2000 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline C \(Foreign)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.386 0 Td
(Preference\), Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
-18.386 -1.125 Td
(Conduct\), and Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A hearing was held on October 26, 2000. )Tj
16.718 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated January 10, 20\
01, in)Tj
-16.718 -1.125 Td
(which he concluded it is not clearly consistent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.717 0 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for\
)Tj
-18.717 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adve\
rse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
16.976 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge entered formal findings in favor of Applicant w\
ith respect to the SOR paragraphs dealing)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(with Guideline B and Guideline C. )Tj
14.192 0 Td
(Those favorable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.719 0 Td
(formal findings are not at issue on appeal.)Tj
-20.912 -2.125 Td
(Applicant challenges the Administrative Judge's adverse findings and con\
clusions under Guideline E and Guideline J.)Tj
T*
(Specifically, Applicant argues: \(1\) he understands the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.715 0 Td
(government's concern about his failure to correctly answer the)Tj
-21.715 -1.125 Td
(question on the security form that dealt with financial interests in for\
eign countries; \(2\) his answer was based)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
43.877 0 Td
(on a)Tj
-43.877 -1.125 Td
(mistake in understanding the wording of the question on the security for\
m; \(3\) the Judge did not give sufficient weight)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(to the evidence of Applicant's personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.786 0 Td
(character and record of integrity, and his contributions on behalf of th\
e national)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
( %=]\n\(_)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H|XϙsgwQQ¬5XPlh
%O1"*((cb[,e{WPDPDEv](g}~߹瞹g|@ (-ؗǟظń.YS 6mN{j mZd젘= j'hZiNMOPr~FTDh5K' E}8Q1Fq@kGP
ǏbBbk,)<0,4&b9c[65Ff}##bZ8L&V^BuAKQ ײ ϫozw1eošWkY_TW@.9?:4|JKU\U^ýf-u孚7hبqO|6k·e+mڶkߡ:wڭg=>E_}gm
#"E
24:f#GaظqI