%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:11:59-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:59-04:00
2021-07-02T14:11:59-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0601.a1
uuid:53e60917-9e1b-4ca8-9464-96c18e1c36dc
uuid:bb8b8fda-2b0a-44fd-8059-b311002df5bb
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0601.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0601.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:11:59 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 21, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0601)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Joseph Testan issued a decision, dated June 15, 200\
1, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.522 0 Td
(a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.993 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(falsified material facts; and \(2\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.52 0 Td
(Administrative Judge had a rational basis for his unfavorable security)Tj
-17.52 -1.125 Td
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated October 20, 2000 to)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline E)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.636 0 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\) and Guideline J \(Criminal Conduct \). )Tj
23.135 0 Td
(A hearing was)Tj
-42.214 -1.125 Td
(held on March 1, 2001. )Tj
9.582 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated June 15,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.994 0 Td
(2001, in which he concluded)Tj
-36.576 -1.125 Td
(it is not clearly consistent with the national interest to grant or cont\
inue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
42.736 0 Td
(The case is)Tj
-42.736 -1.125 Td
(before the Board on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.219 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.006 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-21.074 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and )Tj
20.91 0 Td
(identify how the Administrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.163 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
-41.073 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-30.766 -1.125 Td
(pp. 2-3.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(In this case, Applicant makes arguments that the Board construes as rais\
ing two issues on appeal: \(1\) whether the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.467 0 Td
(falsified material facts; )Tj
9.468 0 Td
(and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(had a rational basis for his unfavorable security clearance decision. )Tj
27.072 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.692 0 Td
(Board concludes)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(H\nwlJ}Aoq)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\n@E|E/EMu"!K;H2g> Cك4nP/HdA-tQm'WLC%=Ԫ뱏|Ếng=5cQZxw=OzPԵ+G7(?RGw{w2qr3ZNߛ2]eU|^Gu|>L;tzVSZ3;V~cUhoӤ^x6X ^rcO`fyf[YQYQ+rf#L!om1*ܫb
+_&pn7aV܇Oy"?`_^ɶquKs