%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:12:22-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:22-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:22-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0676.a1
uuid:393ce159-28a0-4304-8534-4f8729360139
uuid:f77dd05f-c99c-4d8b-832f-ab2dde0e112c
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0676.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0676.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:22 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 28, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0676)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.902 -2.2 Td
(Steven K. Aldridge, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Kathryn Moen Braeman issued a decision dated August\
31, 2001 in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.719 0 Td
(national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applican\
t. )Tj
28.766 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.162 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-20.162 -2.125 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(1992, as amended.)Tj
-11.662 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's rulings and conclusions are arbitrary,)Tj
T*
(capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) to Applicant dated February 12,)Tj
T*
(2001. )Tj
(The SOR was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(predicated on Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\) and Guideline E \(\
Personal Conduct\).)Tj
T*
(Applicant declined a hearing. )Tj
12.023 0 Td
(On the basis of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.749 0 Td
(administrative record the Administrative Judge issued an unfavorable)Tj
-19.771 -1.125 Td
(decision, dated August 31, 2001. )Tj
13.387 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.298 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.91 0 Td
(identify how the Administrative Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-20.91 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
3.582 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp. 2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with s\
pecificity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.761 0 Td
(are supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accep\
t as)Tj
-15.761 -1.125 Td
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.854 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(In making this review, the Appeal Board shall)Tj
-27.908 -1.125 Td
(give deference to the credibility determinations of the Administrative J\
udge." )Tj
31.204 0 Td
(Directive,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.22 0 Td
(Additional Procedural)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a Judge's)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(dqc5q蓶\)u}a')
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]