%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:12:13-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:12-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:13-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0633.a1
uuid:df8f0793-3e2b-480f-b35d-5e4899049b10
uuid:ea89d2be-e914-4695-8e53-8166c6606939
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
29 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
31 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
32 0 obj
[24 0 R 24 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 22 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0633.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0633.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:12 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 24, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0633)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.721 -2.2 Td
(Eric Borgstrom, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
4.499 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.402 -2.2 Td
(Pamela B. Stuart, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\) dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(February 15, 2002 which stated the reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.607 0 Td
(why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classified information for\
)Tj
-17.607 -1.125 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\) and Guideline)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.632 0 Td
(E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
9.109 0 Td
(Administrative)Tj
-42.185 -1.125 Td
(Judge John G. Metz, Jr. issued an unfavorable security clearance decisio\
n dated February 28, 2003.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and Department of Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.023 0 Td
(Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
-14.023 -2.125 Td
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge erred by considering and relying)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(on matters not alleged in the SOR; \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.497 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge made findings of fact that are not supp\
orted by)Tj
-15.497 -1.125 Td
(substantial record evidence; \(3\) whether the Administrative Judge's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.172 0 Td
(conclusions under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\))Tj
-27.172 -1.125 Td
(are arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law; and \(4\) whether the Adm\
inistrative Judge's conclusions under)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.639 0 Td
(Guideline E)Tj
-42.639 -1.125 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\) are arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
25.657 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the)Tj
-25.657 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
(\)}SC{]u5\n\n)
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
H\n0y
CeBh+q؏ 41Q~6:i_8Xn= ـpΩm3}MxQq=k}Prg;\p`1t
^CT1Xl颗ƿ6=Bm*Kn7Twsɲߊ,1wEǴ
ϴ
']Z'|8)%ID{ZS9.Lx'cNSL8cy/g>!c(|d}0}`_NfM>Z|(pd1sFwsCQ
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
H| TnC*@Fh /y&D@QAQFň;\w\QDPDTD}qpw<0a}y'TWսէs$ AP7:VN3n!a1 qjM 1h`ixHגFy A STDhKgd~Q|¶Cϯ3*&.>}# t1E SiLh|WdWU
ijq# rGխǎ́R# D`k!Kv`GjKZ}5x0Ɗ
o6fI]3AV֒ʦAFvN6mּh=<Zjݦwөoݺz倁_}oÐ
#"G9*:fرSrRp+Wz-c0Eu$ZLC;ȃi"MdG_tvܭ>}s&Ƀ!OTy\(_3\WUWՕRMVZifZYJF_<=4
(PWW⩴U:)~J$*I푨Q0xԚ+0`V?Ԕ֜)|I ~L]LM>vMmMmLL-M^&Q3=o(,[f\f\o`\RbkY{igk3t3|
ZCsrI@-}>_ &.}_}o}/^7#U0`"J77+mZ` b1\}U|oԵ)]ڪz9a&le9鿇"%㴿Vߟ6o3נ'WJaC
al{Hfb0C{^+XaPpN98%pA$\P
;a8TBDc(0F(h
0B,3&0 TaLiO)e$d(j0WJ
Z~(Wj\k1ס
m67&܌:-v܁;qfn܃{5\dL}`6Fh0ntBg<<