%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:12:19-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:18-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:19-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0671.a1
uuid:d3dd0dbc-994e-4a21-8284-703927dbf9de
uuid:01d40f15-bb85-4c34-90f6-75058be8ea55
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0671.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0671.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:19 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 15, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0671)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Claude R. Heiny issued a decision, dated May 4, 200\
1, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's de\
cision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and Dep\
artment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether the Administrative Judg\
e's conclusions were arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated November 29, 2000, to)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline F)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.582 0 Td
(\(Financial Considerations\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
-19.025 -1.125 Td
(Applicant submitted a response to the SOR, dated December 20, 2000 in wh\
ich she declined a hearing.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(A File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared and provided to the Ap\
plicant. )Tj
33.047 0 Td
(Applicant responded to the FORM.)Tj
-33.047 -1.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a written)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.163 0 Td
(decision in which he concluded it is not clearly consistent with the nat\
ional)Tj
-17.163 -1.125 Td
(interest to grant or continue a clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.879 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on appeal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.771 0 Td
(from that adverse)Tj
-37.65 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.073 -2.125 Td
(Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-23.073 -2.125 Td
(Whether the Administrative Judge's conclusions were arbitrary, capriciou\
s, or contrary to law)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 118.5 cm
0 0 m
449.016 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 465.0156 119.25 Tm
(? )Tj
(Applicant raises a variety)Tj
-37.418 -1.125 Td
(of points in contesting the decision below. )Tj
17.164 0 Td
(Taken together these points constitute an argument that Judge's decision\
is)Tj
-17.164 -1.125 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
T*
(Applicant cites each of the individual financial accounts which are unpa\
id and in each case asserts that she was unaware)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(of some aspect of the account. )Tj
12.356 0 Td
(While the Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.748 0 Td
(largely agreed with those facts, he found against her because there she)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(has no plan in place to pay the creditors. )Tj
16.384 0 Td
(Applicant says she had not done so because she did not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.356 0 Td
(know about the debts)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(#+Fm45)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgEET,]k
ņ5` /yŀb[,*vQD (wŮ,Y>}{_roΜgs i][PHdpԪ^
-db{], C}$ص>zJ!9=@aSVOh2:8ѓ_q@G!0"@^?G +xvLpdwz5vB9 @҈aQ%x< $=%*ޏ \ Nn&UxzkAZ[8ztx0 6fHU1A7v*Im_f-ڎNu]֫ڠanYӻ{(&M5oV۴mپWNtֽO^
A0,$4,|xĈFG5n'N-t^Z_l-Ź|qX >_tvܭͦ٠y.ו y