ޠԑ:ы 2u?QWzQwA=UE)RR_Gi
4Di0eJh8u̐CP9L4ޣ4M4& (t+͠i&͢4h.ͣrǴ'65p GxAG`GG: QG >9~9ֿM
=$Q
#Ao6Oi-lZٴrhjZCZʣ ZGqmb)mʹhm ])n
6wP}xS! t:J8Q1 :I4r:KTIUtj[T7 t.xm]!4\9
A-֭tnCu uFQ:Eѩ:JG k3Mgj`%kmmhlcdئmn[kumu D3t_Olh !{ G1{b[bOؓ-e=cY[a+m=gm
l34=);՛.ʜCas9 wbDgD8+*DD[,~WUY\
q9х ,[ٚz[4H IU}U?T*_95Ue2O&j2JF3WfYj63&"&R&M̗2N˶2A&$lǼx ̎{Ǎgc21Zz25y˻{Ln̈ &Rř(oU[LJ2q&^%&$2'L&izyL0&O eoJcV\ڬ1&|n0zl4fE C[&G!&4cENU@iiM+bZPƄp̭̅ Unqq^
?@~Dbۡ \
\ BO a zA*~Ou
DB*\@UE6b z\ˎth"cxl ҭr/\q@2_ +!Y ;maoRO;w t} S PV bG& =͇ E6A+. F3b|ōpyx bDc 1#alո 8O: c>Q[*d0ogw!<.
(90ej0c1m*}mt]ap#<GTOKTt mX5P>.?a4곪 tz
Fa 8߸#=چCw>N羗.AVGB\XXΧ$Z"J*z^]Y%[ȷd e< Xɜvx+"F|riO/ow `atőXeP *&˻{c
2XCqk1,#\'տk-m~xuOs7ٯ(+fv?r1%L; &Ok6!`|(iOEhDmB@4H*3z&Q($
5iӪDTMTif>Jo%73y+0_k:47mu7ߏ: qCi>Ui הUFu]ݭ RQUS?jI k |?}ow_Eax7Whr 橏k
ePb 81 oW**>vSU(ʃJg"*1Fe/Q-eOl
c_Ip\D9:CO(`״]|.]Uc6 di }1w ?+b(Y]wu%xt AmWU爱Sl /m >aD%edU5C91xS
DE`KӒ&Jc:+=6 =;DVN~bQMzVZ' ߿ #2C5l&e9d*ދ2[Mcz鰬sT5 dN@雾WK.9 uI5
uxqV#QSvެ6 u`xM|cݵaz={ {iHv-}l~ Ye_Jzs;Jq pB]xE?c[rgݔ2܅ݽgߓ a˨ CrE:HeL2]t+e刷*.Cı k۬B:/sCS'hb mm ȱ,ځub4b^D1Cw E<Dd:_C4 } C={< 9"GcSB?בi-:X6ϋt Uz /? }];;ڷmoo}ml5^u/:Yl钪bcQH_ w+W͛{;f,QiEFE-*ZF$-tRSyn{lT8838Y@_O뫣zŅCϱg K7^^Ɋ]0[O~'i7`ℑ-Rx&3`1˓,YJT
I1h%L3 `nKQ/fG<Jx_BeֳsH.@]vI0s"XA?Amߙ0&S%8Cn9_ S#8¦6 kÖ)a,}=wk$%ޣFq1C1:U&u4BbCа
weq}TJu4? ;%&wz 4^Sk\uzIL{Z+?k^ 6a} ĀB pƍLŤ1pS]%E}/"|T7
k#-8;i#(gwyK.XBU_ Q=D"-'LQo( IɄzWuC{oW
3nZȨ 4P$ aBcxAڶJԧgX%2$QI^ >gg<6Un;Fu>`-daq
įt?[yV-_-Df`n{&F"Cres&ϾbqHͥZSSjwط;_=#= hZϊ?O2o~ڢsb, bƗs:MLt2b |x @"DȈ0,/Y|F E>Ƥ_e^Rgت-
؛ϲLU谬5 _o)\ ȼ gC|F$RnnAUah hn gatbnl4ىd`'qE֜
A1!@ai" ]W< r$Yc8E+=F AqO]-Ѕa*$4Iy.4T-B4#Te )pgro)e^ XqݔR"M cIlvSHEP6mvB4b
l8jd j}ޚD睰aϞ}~(Y35
W 4R?>S]5JXbN0<jh[~#0$/> 4z!+idB~GKr@BMNSb)p18U{1 ,)ߊ*ы2fY)fP9 5G"T4և4tDTT"h
F5*L At(' & rTz^ 9 ũ`, ʡPm)(|!ashzxƃW/F @DU ҃V-]|D.Aߨa-7{a3= \X| B@B|>9ܠL
e FrSzN K vAMl llDkof?l:i~ď( (EuwsuĄBq'_1_pN` P TZ@Y(p|%Ez}81>K[o:G3xnK'$VEUU+T0,
, X\,bւ eI>̢4L ( ;qү6tcJ`rDCrmr++/kenE LF:&>-\_tW%4=/ɵh5miNP_O,l2a0H'g 8E$Vn\1
ke+ 7UdAsrtI'3ɉ$ c?^A1{\_15ƨˡ8^\TLD(%
|*I-M͐IDtpbr pW V˸y ,W*+H\5/+R_29B@.AHJthʙ$KoY~Gc]}nKlSϦuhzoOsz翾3}}ڞSPO c'bM3uLx"sa'Lq㈿ـ
ЌI poF"~}kNZk8)7D!Zݞ]n?xpcK&I&Ϯm$867am42M=R"X/̏DD y'e
O?{~) L \Lh`LjH Hc̯_ o ))%R++ .7Q̠%%
{is_%MBBg*5 C7 ^B(NO%Kk0
C& Mb, X8*'^k1ڌMFY E8˱,ne,b.Vm#H/9D.*Y8 saaj6
? S[q$鞉g)pA{u$S3 @Dʙ?_oث ;?#DpgUUňbff80U!Ǯ8̞"Qͺ(ɞ[W7~voւ5ɄyV/=q:V= a, s>:}s>iԓ?y L 샏_}wYYeN=}9=㑸44+ 'W^ E7%rY\L4=J=, Ft4 Ft|l +2Gۤ^,@|x4d Φx1.0k]Tk-L귘WO4MNqUʪXңb ͋BLzPƪi8xJ
(ӵ)¸uh2hVgeL nw#ň\ btg]7tƌqs
R炡Z8o*یJ( ),sVڏvK V˚w挽Ѯ*>! Mwehis-{OX <AiP[:u4H OB3 ">>}*ɑ\IeKO
p9/ : "?K2sQ)YㄡɥDG
.
HP]6W%@}%$$1llVۢ5/16M aL" !-6$hl^apbQ
Vcq$M 1gImN-h܀Dxd
v vmЈ: -`oR3{02]}:0
%%Nrѹ'V@ S#9`6Ӑ~rP"K) bWg? ߳i5LO?GlEݍ7 @=FI XޖyqOVG>{TyyUK+XQ/(27n:<8d|FY6f<֔hV֪veSv Tpwx8;yx[y[-'aganXHR,T*8E{P!IyBN aQ d e2 )>&!DY}o*'HM8 5S 2 SJK1=r,F
7RFPDZ #KzIy'7c ʯ zoO@!\Os5@] "gKbQ^< !E_& YዹU?y7N٢mZ&]Tov$`wv.No۵`͆[VJ͛j+צojx֥OT5#[k=>F۔k5XKVf} \~ee$6&T$"g jJ jĈ_Q ^HDܸ_g O,r|`RK擸lHv&DEY߱b@#n4uc6=>A(*N7*;I{BCD60TlJ4TP. ԿO(&Ppq#\dΩ>M0sbE,A CJk]8տ_x :kZZ3W}7$c߁<=Gw x V__6/A
n}x7A xFZ (@Y M} f eGk \c*y:=,FtR=$v8m}CuzVk{-9 }Żhj]
g102&Fw M @ #0~~@H߆&a0&+
|4GE1oj4Sc(!; Cwn6J7Davo>}<5@W} ͦ
Ed{JlMSޣݿ_sV~qUSzR \B =mT3 #&c@s
CBÊ|4py !!c4HRP ?HFF> KhmИR.j"<+X%&RxxtE1[(}+_Vi2cMd^{=ƢLpU
*I~0W.
ˤfIX+mDoڜҮ!pqH:͟~<-_./Iw;= ^TD,t KR"
D/Q"qE)9c:
{&E] W'4;-i}`](`}
]+Ҹ: )Z@D : ԭN-ͣ hLVϕSmd@(6u`5
z뗋$> f͞DP |nؗ2)_^Ќ(e'NN* FaѱMo _8>?.UƆV|]xJIS_#V~y`BRh*bb @
L>4Z.]=|]y+2 LO[ծ1u08 XvoV UWjR4
MbrV| ?R?)"eB=1薼qo'+e~ ?Ύ g;9vrq(#1h#@ jvBm%L thUVCi&OeP[$:iuj'
&QTT{;+PB ڞ LÇ pRCy K3(/'&?4XOgg eF#7R`REޓ O? T'Cx" AqLR%K
%$2˳&KŢ-E1@t̲X2=EԩU]Ԛd/;"."tdb(˳ -A)XY >;=],ꥒe[[ƫ ktAw ߺ
Dũ(o<`[wUcr~K"6C ' k)|1pxa8]RhM%!͔ L(uHS&Ӆ:L&-eLTLJ&LJd&e},ha;\EcccXZE:wgHF7[dH mֹٲ-WnÆ5~=UEsYwу_-!,_gix19u)sP-&磇}wmNJW_{sT. 7}Z^ >;ucL{L7 -{O?# V&MauCn$jGy:3w- /^a~ ט,tty`xB:LU0N_'$ԙUsΟ9igɗ>]BBmR<} .m r $t nv5Ƕ\zo
s0po n ]b~upZ8Ւ
hdk ~X Eg;\5's,"EL
.Gٲ֬]}Mc nJ>/nZn$beKƛ?zqbK?<ٸ{CgPo_nJp3?l\Zo|:S=;m=!* UH%O̶H- awP8t1zE /*3 ,:*c"9)Cz @~/jシz~ލ*}Œb*oTFD
"IJXrȆ!{,s ; d=f#`>Re_|) Ba?,Q2C藺rү:OϖJ6D"O*2
yR3_1/pl<
Q`G J"Xy:*[{&nƟn זǙd, j\oEz$ZAL4C+`pp*l'mS7OlIE"q/ \M9 E pqVXT`QzQB;^/Ce
[Qf$m5gk}$GSs Fik"WJ{ Š]
LAU P -IN$:yYtT| 3:<0|} w Ի؋0m ӁFKw.gap@n/seWe`nQ h쾦?Rp=q,MӣҠ> gLө 1 P
Iwry6@Зva* #&[ ;7;VzG#X=-+_l4Q(25MWҎH.-vu,6رMo4%q:Nbݲ>GaBuG`%m&8:<jiO laݹ@wG_Yu[ ́w3x@9s@"|3:{siMѬ &X=˸
82Ő g;~/3bkZ0^IPZ)N))ݒ_CKȃ ^=m\uwsvr9'8b;n8iXX6B-NK$ϲ
2`k *&MҦh#HZ$` 5C(U :54{w~'E{XEZsiW %>R m6F9[9?ǜMH$ښpYDlB(G(J ZiSMgKK=cDx,Ό9]dYO_o*WV] Q4jJ7=@L2$l
?q~xx?'~;9"V{pdũv {{7VT ܱVWY jO?G)
f@=z9 o%oRQ,k$]Xez2c:]
:;za6UT
##쀑4:Qmms'i8 %$-.>pܥ96b ͟t o4]MOfM
]NS WUU M6i֠کpmYV$MM{*tbC'y}A2\ q7wIzze%v4ƙ@ԹSKKx0 ,Hubb Ō.L 7o[/W@By2(} j#rZ[m}w1H8..nky^RU\T <4y|Rz#ÂU=Lp+n# ڪ3i]ֵ*\d@+=_RQVM0ܭQv ̶f6sk렞{Cy@O3~ Ko39C'_ 42O gss=J
2̉FoitˠEZ t(^SʹQ/3p+I̾ Yryj%tߑ?pu|yRt:izF8NvD mc`bV5l]鉠ZN5kXT%`PjtځE d7BoFXHw[{
ԝ 9 v8*^Xg>訯vC;UdfF~"F2iţVl-f) dRx?fOG6q>ĭ+QIl7GXW]
/~jvO'L ({neObBy7'*bp%cgD:)VCj.)V#7=(}QtDyҘB/Sɋ\2\) GF.)|l Kb|wc}ql_8 `WFAkĿQT6+I(5i`k0( I 4jZ7).-JcZۥRn#8{%aI{?{}aS`}--rreX4Xq XՙbѨ PZi彖J `0EA@ȲR`}x`>FS:5J pHMD33doz?*A`QL#wiDeTB"!P&; KBK2,\K$SR d{VAsbЏrN$ҜXK>"ŌA:;%&FTG<'qQ* S*Bb4\ {$FE#";mg;5%
d>Yf[@u%꒡'wg
J iW:@-!^j n%eJYտUӥ' =/G;QrX#תA#
[ "#Ėa ]D9Ҋ]ʐ:}=O(0Ww`JʙR0Cpu!-GMv ԌQUaSpRiAD8~ GhSc,ǻ8 }/($P% :stV(9|2w97rMFƢDqEh 'Q w 8/rh?fg%b`>CsM0$.eK!e1dF$_7[
%5$|%k*aE[
2D` q(AK=M.Ǽ%&/ >!,EF,LbX2uhM@ M)#>
.Z@S#iFÚZ&\wTP-IKWd3+
Oπs+<+'jߎb;1/*Yz}}'=_Ͽgɲ q kp \6nƢ}
VWۖ8նUڪ v'jnr 9w#~t݈cy5$Qp:B5\$vgmцh$VJ\YAX55=u p"X-Dj[ mjRҺm]N.Sh{Gj =c~ s gŗaZhERHHK*QhD,H[XeL4bՠkSM1XIY5:{/~;~ SU⯭ݟvG]
V
.S3^zI*͚Sx?)D/] MHLǓ3#}j}\] C : f詷3%!n_^-+;DcU:Pt "gJoUT
E4V$n77M˄MG
>Cญ2 5 /CN6uC(SAL2j8N}2%;,CB aDbXIGE
d
⦖g
n /V$ aaŕU' whQՈI $¸ Us~7]DƇ5u|ށމM 8v]U|t,ԡ5gYP vG=Q=Sy;SϬ @9 "ʖ2Y3y(|f(7ȬSg)M7 sB\!m,su A^=2eڤ>qEmӧ4b\^T"C(zԖr*ܿtf~}}kDknFH!|
Ys:.XXgTCy-d;)XoVVs`{s]1O¬ @ Ytvņ]8>wےfA+KrKn WlO I+jd29YSb\<CJ2?.F[$^v$A]w!O(Hk&Oߌg/!M_h*A oY@-M
&O§^lL4Wkq{
5R5g5$EZ>GDgL_(eh6X0
@BTL= n.bF@ȧbP.2
E16Ep(A 4EX:RT.z>~u܂OՕ|<( Ѷ6|kǾ=O: C?%5n\ M*cNv'ӷKߓإL$wig^_L Q|(v4qD9l~> O)I{$.]Q{# u^.e\ݬ}mGOЧ=n̰{ z~~D0 Clvjp馨n
IF -9|ӈJz +|ܓZMq;d_ JNDٴ3GO1T]1jNRY2f7y.Ŭ$IU0 [$H)B; $N 9l&=-|< ľw&nҹz'@gYwvYSw>*<)*e:M%]?{'_Όg7͘Ԝ#&jz{I'LyKT`= X- =@^3ށp*ViUܤ!jXX/;dzlG$BEһ7܊`2= #븈H}&OȆ/ r/k;o Y |vu FBvZwU:T%o_A}sφ/~lz>
=m_]-aESM`(yA3 .x)&,|^uغx?d:{K 64[V3
El y4f*0čCf?n綛ۋ[$dq$|xRL~v2=h4=hYRERc(> }5Ltfmr79Cy5 PZDfv6q};'gDZ/srvI83_P>$*$M.@c
C]͠E4kڇVE!`De*X7onk=9-ޛ|2-#0XK X3Yض. -AǕ +1O !Q!?Lng @ jlifL!֨ :w16IG9&*(;1A-%Ig:`)n,'v8^mIK08x90 a&GܵI /Pn ϭ^ o[e[vzd ڂؙ E;F?} !}65;
A|ɎP[pգݘَRDa8CGE?Pi2LMZc{3
1LaK4C293"! HEOYN vEWlg ݁ .1!\EX #Jͥ_̭7Aqe6 ?_5HްXYE Xx!±qx `E q\cK4Gr; @.B:4v׀Q(C`jX& A
= @2p 6ŏVCcʜaΣMh 35XZޢhv5!Idİtemɒ< 2%p}6i4ڴ)Qh5nH[DQ
+k7]$*VY^*FDȵ(]"ԊXpjR+tSo&p
.Vn~V2yM zZ
&=أER-qxg3є4 _Vɗj[cVL4ہ; -#s))~羅DH\džPe$ω*2 fТhv8.rr}kdէU&> uqg=^j'n1J hK ;#u&2Fɘ6XX2HBWI?X5+ .35aX( "% XTl
çIAP~{t*۽[Io>%|>位v{@al{gG68Iōk_۳9q17~+640ڷSo h˙ñX[cSwVurWp72.ڊ k^\^B>Ԃ=Ў jBՀHuWeDR)Q=J!.^U?b@a
QvvdծvJ+eݡ@ GF8.n Q ?}Ld9nmI阧-J P] -e8^o6rNC])7x ~=GVBE"Y_dZFYib}lc{7j;wHa >pǹ*ϵ"'mxT l.qu2祆i&~o כ@[*Ovz{SZyYpkݵEYBaDeSK:AkNqMg}^/KK? c=3D?5i<&Fe<$[&rJABE4 GHXd k `,
s|
79ZX(ܙL @sosca0ȟ>fR M]Z)uk09E1 &;ޝξK؉c; R|@,HDMZVF
]Sm6nLiHAZԖH61`S4T à~}6I[~[*Ng= 9eD> *IA~ #N,,bzfr)}*dbW Ԛ檭]'Fw}me?5 o\XW<7G
]'Nmoz{
JsxƦ8L5 R
MEN{z:
B<@+)^[V^ gNx(fK:x22EQr< vh ą".X( }4ZgޱLS='nLɹd.dbq. \ tetvf34' GL9CHCHnwl%_#dVfu[3, Y.P
mV
5&S Kz:=0B`8a.!e]p*]䊺-jztc 1O| 79VGihxEloj?Pa\p>Ep<8%\1.R xRcq)a p#ŨWHd *g C +1Jyf *@n+>Qۢ5q:aHᵛ_|7dҞH$n{fcw? wvnj}^?j. r )O!
3!A2Ai *RXP
+F!(F8^ؚrbAD% h8#B6..Y#,wPH+ `2s6 d@r8LFĮPWE D GO_E`i4c>_$ 뤗ZHZI%yHSP|XL>
3ia
̙v0rR
OA!˺66e_>mW[F0/Dqq{E<>
eͬ'k ?W >Xݨ6$U/qLI|*N;&↹Q{R>,IC M O'y
Hn 6m仂5WcҸa , ^{ijost
`EǒyL<`yp4.qҘtCUɖ`%ҔtSS!Q+>e͊( ӦҲ*7'̄0)
O/V ͍ ]%T!1Jx˙4NNd vUC M=:
3YW|떳hhv\45}JYWDş:ϋL5Z rʲ듥c{Ab3ymON.X M@Y UY}2z:z!GưC]3^z 6tR4
=>+a .4Eh%~?9! -HT. suvDm{ǚ'GvƶU {lOxl{& ?o؉؉4iJiM!mvX*յCAfA,-4Oy[/P)hܖ??(-jDx4)\ۻ8{Ϝܙ;;>#c>ؐJ|)ͯ̓yܛ XR/3\!`l 8 Iaϗ'GFvpQ C]hW3s"N
{.9E$4U~1ikvC# :>[{Č^}HCk{KSý#;C\w^p'zAJdS#S鐦q~p ص0_r$~aWeĽ*#T[!}F00qnzK;S/48_T9V%qa@p$]j kl@ t]aQYgf:xн##1] & f7no[LU {$wfa
<ۄ0MxJsd xW5UUmML6tl4LCC9G}*i/trOA( WksVJ 7`3]⪕XK 'Jf5Y%}hnU&s2Y&o&y=F |2@-A
֤uؖX"5`ƻ`^!Nw/#+2b!7?B?Drl,,}ٛ ߝH/!B9 Uw%|}סU93S`;A {nVC 13]QwQfn{tM!ƟؔN'$bj[ Ml51ivKi=֮#P CH ]oݿFNV(/6}xL^ܒp&~%a3{GK g3Ý 6| ml- Z(B5eK(u;P֓*">b|XBY~jÏ # !U*m6^:CeAd"EK C R QnJ6BÒs$a
Y E`! \ k4`,Ne
PZ≬;_Vc]b< o msrt3X>&?Ul'k kh` Oh-R
tt䉑^ 4 i1)NIcl%撈3d}H _ZryJazml kVQ(פ-1;tccl[lQ-DJ%mmZVVTi,5^b9q'-
P`a_}UUS@J#2ݦ0^X*iKJHJLPs3G Td6-2>LL7+F2mЭG ?J-evWoȻ2/ zE
ZqVN~77[ʳ|+g+mG2" to4 %>faWu. 8:7v0 ~gp0 SGLƾagkkss[bݲ6$S!lPƠ#) 3_VQE˯@Y{.@f SMOM$H\dXsd 1 V[hj Y eA;y,[{[{bF'?kL]}Y'xGBP, S(,-` A-Оa8z^X30RFjd,PpO9n Ȋ`0iK8
( X^jGsɆah0F(*S] GFd_(Y]]e
$Uƫ{rd_Y2k,Ɔ2ޅl'if'L8_ %G/ ~cVL nlIfܒߕ >} Bu shZc uf "JV/Qi.Ǧ:j> LEc|W[[Myk E/3^@f2V]L .EC5^)-oQRy7j7
[a 5_[ѸP\V{꽜U- n %\9+ëuPVqp^yn
yqFkhfb^5"%5q\p?uL=V[n18
p}q+ EdvhZ/_]*3ENF鲝,u;p"I d鿙y0ܗ3ll ríc"',32!K bԐV~U.l1y W)5[,N/c8STco7Z
k
>X?_?&|5LkRP$>eT^H kEE$]Qw c{{ۗ{v($F(Ru[ij'nhXCuYU,Mc ۤ =݅Hd9UW|UFa
/?yO5?Ճmmgp xoh[zՇixHzс&.7
67oިICa\ek D8e ].+,^m" X>|%%&J&/jd;u| *0w!E",
qz)&m`Ѡ
e,,9g F)Τ}$}zH"lI:"LʔXSކ49!tqAr"N!2 D"AK%ŋ-ZX_rwA3
mG]k`~}PI% ]X$ψQFPudYDx&4\<'㼩Ӿ9x"**FDWwjd \%xIo V3Dax'ړdk騥vyG\:E-
;1Y&8vD<9g͎r<r~Tp
iB`q2| '5Wkl
s7urB_Y0|1 uwZ-q0GFZze*i*x8&(javTت-]Y ^WR~eҶe+I@ UDGXcbB1!8/0y&|QXBC*b1h+G28#m$U<Ƞ&*1D[MM?Ojb[hwf/Zl4=ʐ:ݞeѱaqBR'SQ櫞W?ɜ0|MU;0[fFoڗؗze|ՇBZFV9#=Ĕ4¯K4< iƴqDi4don&@Cr?& ⳁlIvsbrsYĂ wuW*T@|x(S) ZWuIMD6@h'V rl5;*Rz <7*Uu a'--EzLUH\ +7s
~ysG:gtپ
U ]
k0wxa>^ZB -0!i!Atڐ5%$zg/kV3qN;/FRcZ5"pIr#9-@*SIT7ƌ)1Rf -;_hqb͝k~ÏKw S9) b/x#A Og1xi=S-%XcЦzrtcіi2hWi8Ei5t,fjׯ Q=0.Y ⚵ Pi:֏4}^k&0.'& biTVzU TI0RsA9L0)^&UiA. W +(o`MV|V=ضhjխlvbf8Qѹޟ~>S_ǚSmeLyTI#3dD獨i \s(+6tІFmȖhAe="5+hXWhUBG8wcM.W+|\cLPmt<&,^ۓ6ږT4~GՄBxY
&@z3CU{r\ +&., `R#Ғl
ٔ ۓ?ۜ3LyΓC,DKB|!؇kُُcZcܙ}cw絏yz9zׯVTo ΫH ,NU" ۨP 4DTĐH*RI4rVQHB Dvu!73wｙ9;((cz}NJ'I$ӈ4ٰN,E$<|_|'4k1ѰbEzY3ɡ{_, :>?tkzفH'P*#QE-Ȩ[h& I
o?aJQ2 ;T2@Qu쬅ebwL26 ":,Ns"#֚zElδpwh
dS~3J,ZZ>Q-m=B>sClW$W33p3Ăɤ>3ܺoH s~S_Tc @^_ IL iPEoEt~Sk
Tx
5!a^ DTUITA*U1` Fآ
{lQ vsܹe;S jz, .JȦ ⽋Dm$:VaM HM9F{,W ڂxYL^¯^d
S¬21Ajz¬ݬחez `^$<_\{G' ??8 GhL4p6_CL[/PވOa]Jh
\*/8̈́"J zSS[:ajp&WAtlV0)K x)2ʂ!}'mkM]VLp;ID V|iI7vmbsO;24yR2ztwy hYcNSY&E۵ǗcMf'}^nA)T\!EKxf#U vHŋ!4K `y| ].HXSجkaveX^-`VwJy2Dlà " 3߰
֨NJuQ* :i.H!;p%b42f
r ? ϰ03jm{
V0ܟ:iA v-dlTf' $mWBD46X*QJ72v VN)1 jI2-QDâ$ٔU@6`#-u VF<B6hM\Ă |lTGbte dpT#b2?Kfn}bgcNjۍM@M];8#t,;e,/p e(;
f:Eӹ TԀs&q$NG1ªO&VV|4&Y.C0C1pZS78[AdtɈaT4圜#u;
aTW y9u |* D!ȉb8>gvsΙ̮wwݹyfgc@4!uc:РU*Ej TX6B*^ҧF8$V+)/HUyp 1*Hߙ[9sۙ3<̱UU+'#Ere6jj $Dy7n#nP:{I58;H%[:g P4OȌw8ՁȽڝv o&>)|)|fP*j qs/ i f p w3_j B(|Q^/E|Qgpe8H=ƙƸ9ncf}yΚuD֖
v|W{喨XD%Nc 챚c1q"4sH~: 9>Js+Ҝ Ei1
Si@
0$i㉆0S`A"#:
YA]
5 )ǫfu6Sf-DYRd-[,zb[gw*ش-
P`G
Bhwc[n{ ]^$68؝#C fر-SL9ILO&Tq:&Vjb !Jv4 W$_#!.g![1qNŁkyIz4,v'ꢦK˙mlQ9O/~
ȎiiG_6g}OmNad -ύIɈE$\Ng6>Fn}EZz?+z_%DST@hC&t^n*AV0=kT(vyJaE&*S0zGyqNkߖw$N ֘QW8܊Xm_<F)SL|ψ3U ^b2&`A.%-$w51 gGyoysG) 9|!`A!+y?v:Kj1Ն_ f \
-QIv,Hی UFh5T?^|@kp$R"Hy
+n$cx")H 2~_+nH4e͡oA٬υV B5R;reS:=QG Kވ4C>O J`D ҈xzj|J0ض|bY)3ЬQ 0YyKk ~]:j잜^}f9QUW~ZC% ^9\$cǞe
9yɋgwG*tR:++_eTbN C%6Fj#p646EҤ&MY[6=}~m6 Slk)L!uj?\uV熤!~q%|E ާT &LگZt_;n{=4R8;ӹJJ5Oqr9gسYt3y%Vマ2("vy:
eCtVUrA>
8 {NqQu *s1no
$Uh`6Wm;
"^9Qu4{)қV&e5 f?W}pT?nlfMIn>6dIV 4ɒ,H$lRHbkXҙZu
tXZN5NmGv tF}i?s<9yp`yNZ
H,\XS-UuY ԃee u͊roˍENQF ^UYm6 VOV{9W ~3>: v}8ژ8 P܁]چo<-eVhCBߠzMn*;Mey5,j, | h^,>xZSJcu~zVK0RЄKL%=#Y
zS1kuyVm XPci+J;ّ@K`y@ҫ] HU ɤ{n\ } öp/};Q7^?? 쑗k7q[ȵ5(v+HIq}dQ'+QcOF a Ez#nY^[ng34 hxY'KK25]F4ԃQ~P{h
Q(TW~`)m ǁ 6t WS1
D{* T1_ȧJŨp=Gbn5GPߌwu Ԩ5co2 9A{7l܈z UnyݐycV7<9zAI';'}2xݼf{Ml?_g#i۪˶/A{D]iZw'#c P6o6"ԢbuS} -zT{B)ڭ7R ͆ c=Jgن}$hc`_ GxܕՓ
v#@ OH?i9@ AH
#@ hxާ@/m0n63MsC |s܁a%}%u|@A7J6/--Q J*95MUrṋiR*qZ̜M-
a>)R -G(۴D5 ؟~.*%33 DŽc/CEzV XPtuE?>O3'X2K1#}² 1ߕ`-Q~xtg[1G y}ZcԨS~Dy Ʈ'H(_ы1/&pKD2x|S<ɹ/sIJAm)}*jEUzGdԚLJZĹ$cs)^Bii\~)Sm)dsZs;i)И:bIt@-DT A ys8`
Z:G!?Ne։T,mR'"͙ʣAZgAΧ+<%"c[}0Wس ]9z;
$~r,;ʎ|Mreuj\kPgA݅ aj*SmϽ^8m/R4VJΚOu(C0PI Q
髭K8~}ITj0I1 ѤiB(*P)*eh)vjʹiAj*PG-F+Ŏڡ`~eG|{wsev"W*ȗMGp@94(\m9b2UrΗB&*^eqe_ y1V -tn ǞgL}FigR͉a MZM9s <tBQ2ڽXGz] ߂_kc?Y?I𰳗-VMe&q;LjiXበ,'X۰O\gKX
E2y$9lUBGfo-ZV 2IF/_ E"c\1xXǩ' O=Ox'fvexo7oo$ G}'^]x} 'ea&>JM=9Hݎep]}b[g8Eڇ3]Uж%Ub~_ĊuuuۃKY^ ^<= bImbg:ۘOpv^^`5jkМ;N^'ykWA%OS
KLSo#.vW~Y. ȱ?](lFDCzK]X 3v>9T==l=#}u'd{5?X~?ǽD ZL5hղIn&kD@sjgկɳ=2>8#50*-9]S@LBy5]<^6؝ G9-}b 9d#?EN0F/\s`(w\%Gg J\ҹ-uǠ1]y {)nbnң# ehF&ā3Y>$fC!K{9rNFDj ;;lm|Nv~Ȣs|ߪ>5q'TA ¯5zds"z0 { Ӏ 6R.L6|2Z /TiW6ktwp.HUc:2I4 F.+檦b_E 8q 2RY /8ģ6$mg)֏|-0E}ټ;ƻw9n3}?.8SDZ<|̝+e6iDDUNcoK}{ ?Y|e9Ul\2 m}@hg:sި_t`f.Ϧmf7c=zA汯֓s#YEvmLBڜZspDs' G YmB{ϫUú(Oo{6r'W0,S guw1_8)PxI=07d{r}AZ< f0R4R~];~d |!vk ?|tAxܗZh*2ȽxmH v&+dD,_,[бJ M4?$~#%T˥ml5&?tz5a%I ~^Tq'F>M,.ڙ{g$>yܡ*DuH7eĨLC_UqW[ '/Ciq֏ e#[8ԏ= ~d,eof gl<&c%q$/`! ے]y~awvzП:,kw3pW'
BG7l0/|}1V>ٹ2h< λ=;{Gо?~{0.|XRHf ]<3kuIz
e͍Sjmr]^FZB/&'vψ_?'X)/ < ~S&LrLL{9UhL菳Qg RBɋh
t朘lB7m5Km15CIuM24ꤋ9c-3h:Z\O{K>Mn6̃|7J=2;a}5qۣ٬59>oq} Gr\rΪ MF(TIP$-D QVUleVi(Am`ai SuTرG(ЁiGG*֊f;{I;ܽ}?]|N֒[ P
XSmV cZu,g F%]Nf;C![r]13;8*PQBswB21GEwWر? ]w 㺶$랬c.ɼ&Oy勚wWcOÝ<qٸ F* Es g
:^OTEX=.Z'ώ? ?\b|倢*i/ : u%}9/Wb_0H}K;^lyNt (K;l}.~ e #ok&nj91i2Ym.>sz{+C˯cXJ% RF{9r߭ʩtbQf^6f*4XM17H14QU= O귘KMP/y(}]_yƹ(b18s33xw z{ 6\}:hcwg`o%;&~Ml=ooc'4촸]NCp(w7L `_fߘs:%R;ͽ [ιheޖQNfO{Cˋq e1TE*Bf_
Ά
V}1: Wߕ 20X&C$ f.$XRD3Pغ66d[9SYq~EёeV;6'Vcm| ]ISG ;9/s st#wz6"lKByUU2G*%Uަ|6Psu2{YhQLP4' ж>wWTJFNʷJav1y-={J;S:ʽKHZydnZMO\75*茖9 WTD5L|(C3ߑ
m()Ja\k2vW$, ۤ#%lɞ ky #x"GgaϤm'zݬt
}2,z6qhvϣgz~ϥŖ{9/7J[JҠm{D2v Hn4SiA3.w}iߢmy(wJS O
;k'c逎#M~Ǿu<صHúkcv n2.Y4v 7Gzae{tmtC=w
k{bK
융γ͋ߗ-u ЦȎKiAy=u 737={ù:o氮g|cmщv||ۍ?Ϣiޏknʶ9>nϙ]LƮuȧRP< 㫊r
|a 0Su9YQ{d/5Y
ů `$7agZ%}z2V}.YwH4Hz?fطRޕjn"|^
4VMADlV
y%Jʼn^&A$&UrNϿ}r??5< m?;oZb_$L#,! .!DܻH9$?|BzEw3o7dzKac4kG+{ پ11[RW G%SR*OSy#&t[i=2*31y,ոqlVnyoDr+s6M_& R8;kZ8
Z&w8._!
yO0iE'7|I~ vYWpK!7R=g>"ʼcsr]i_,A_' ߒ0QYeޑ z9OsD_ ) 7tV?"vyj K^毒UQ -Z]?;vU Wf ()WyF7,_UPD")FjU 8ʥarVJ:y&QtMs.57!JPj*zֻ [7}ld].ju뛞)>o})Lm˛X0=gCl
Ҕ%vS lz/qݻ66?^@
ڋq)"Y^Р+Fr6JPhLVM*%"V>@ VhZGRZF#MpQ~Rilvμ̜{挼~nƄUe/{/SxHEK)v}G}K(b@eZn^<~
7Q/xs F{NwQ k' Ĕ70a*}3CL\q2O!4^߉vb?\|s>, yK1mebSSHaWd~wq:E
G|Ӳk4k=G-sU 9]uEQډ0KjJce L5[c̾~1?e
;/%Ա,xb
f LW`vg.6b*>YA)GQev]?Nj^s}R Eo?{دy_r32=]7{
+Խ)V,CQܟ z<o4Z 4'NQޡa ]&wcqY/cnc7+7YIy 0\:w3췄+[zXƷNJXe<X3|:ZvPǺYhͯ5M,͏dQ0̇ p/k!bõG^kqyrY>βoO<|6|99pgFh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4F|p-sïO0f-aȯ}8ĜKwˑ
7N:9GR>ɡR.Tz ٍޘ#,? /:#s>b~Pc wrfj?B}cQo:#QQN.9555JPZ>[r5 5$A#:B8\KsLMIQq>b%>ƬRKڐZ亩}r'c+$։~1eZV-lrLtXZΌ&Z<_bj!i")Z!@WYK*KN+f)g" 8ߜj豭x,>Md" #XZm}=f!;\a7]Iڑc <K[H
G5rI֖[mhj
BnĬpJF
DRVV=FB6qj}ɐͤ; LV_,l'ckjXʮRmٽ]v8lh
۩P21v:*vwQکv[7kmo |rU`RE2砕Nvo0ywc>GF'Z ;с[$F,b)HNTkm:Ema2vTc鴩$i>Ɍ2N9}ss{tbN>K'|vvWH geὃbdIU<\'2wۀq ^ 2fٻHo$K+"a-[){W@VmHfnYPT#;nnۤ<5*Q>"@a⤔p2~OL@!]lx_we1 Kc_YiO)rk;OzPG˂]@)p=8w7
80"zk8
(ks\d?p=6sEYB) 2ۑX- e)`k' .>kʪ4 F Pm ö:Lf49.¢@ZJkT#M 4b)M.xP\J>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0713.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0713.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 213.75 591.75 552 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 652.5 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 627.75 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 550.5 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 525.75 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(The conduct of applicants must be evaluated in light of the reasonable p\
erson standard. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
36.072 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-)Tj
-39.404 -1.125 Td
(0462 \(May 25, 2000\) at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(p. 4; ISCR Case No. 98-0355 \(March 12, 1999\) at p. 4.)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
("The falsification was an isolated incident, was not recent, and the ind\
ividual has subsequently provided correct)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(information voluntarily.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(3. )Tj
("Omission of material facts was caused or significantly contributed to b\
y improper or inadequate advice of authorized)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(personnel, and the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.553 0 Td
(previously omitted information was promptly and fully provided.")Tj
-7.553 -2.125 Td
(4. )Tj
("The individual made prompt, good-faith efforts to correct the falsifica\
tion before being confronted with the facts.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(5. )Tj
(Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 2 is not applicable to the facts a\
nd circumstances of Applicant's case. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
44.92 0 Td
(See,)Tj
-44.92 -1.125 Td
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0557 \(July 10, 2000\) at p. 4 \(explaining differenc\
e between Personal Conduct Mitigating)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Condition 2 and Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.75 0 Td
(3\).)Tj
-22.75 -2.125 Td
(6. )Tj
("There is clear evidence of successful rehabilitation.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(7. )Tj
("The individual initiated a good-faith effort to repay overdue debts or \
otherwise resolve debts.")Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
[45 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0713.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0713.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 756 Tm
(18 U.S.C. \2471001, a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(federal felony. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.969 0 Td
(See, e.g., United States v. Yermian)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
13.775 0 Td
(, 468 U.S. 63 \(1984\)\(case involving prosecution)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 742.5 Tm
(under 18 U.S.C. \2471001 for falsification of a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.691 0 Td
(security questionnaire\). )Tj
9.636 0 Td
(The government can allege and prove that an)Tj
-27.327 -1.125 Td
(applicant has engaged in criminal conduct even if the applicant has not \
been)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.739 0 Td
(formally charged with a criminal offense)Tj
-30.739 -1.125 Td
(by the relevant criminal justice authorities. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.355 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0382 \(May 3, 2000\) at p. 4;)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 95-)Tj
-20.687 -1.125 Td
(0818 \(January 31, 1997\) at p. 4. )Tj
(Proof that an applicant has engaged in felonious conduct militates again\
st a finding that)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
("[t]here is clear evidence of successful rehabilitation." )Tj
21.918 0 Td
(Given the record evidence that Applicant falsified her security)Tj
-21.918 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire, the Judge erred)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.246 0 Td
(by applying Criminal Conduct Mitigating Condition 6.)Tj
-12.246 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's findings and conclusions about Applicant's financ\
ial situation)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 648.75 cm
0 0 m
408.258 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 424.2578 649.5 Tm
(. Department Counsel contends the)Tj
-34.021 -1.125 Td
(record evidence does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.218 0 Td
(support the Administrative Judge's findings that \(a\) Applicant has mad\
e arrangements with)Tj
-10.218 -1.125 Td
(individual creditors to resolve debts which are worth)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.328 0 Td
(less than $10,000; \(b\) Applicant is now able to be financially)Tj
-21.328 -1.125 Td
(responsible. )Tj
(Department Counsel also contends the record evidence does not)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.908 0 Td
(warrant the Judge's application of)Tj
-30.908 -1.375 Td
(Financial Considerations Mitigating Condition 6.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 252.3203 597 Tm
( \(7\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 252.3203 596.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 567 Tm
(Department Counsel persuasively argues the record evidence does not supp\
ort the Administrative Judge's finding that)Tj
T*
(Applicant has made)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.192 0 Td
(arrangements with the creditor to resolve her debts. )Tj
20.798 0 Td
(The record evidence shows that Applicant: \(i\))Tj
-28.99 -1.125 Td
(has not addressed her outstanding debts in a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.83 0 Td
(timely manner for the past few years; \(ii\) has failed to follow throug\
h with)Tj
-17.83 -1.125 Td
(past promises to deal with her creditors; \(iii\) failed to complete a d\
ebt)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.13 0 Td
(management program in 1999; and \(iv\) has failed,)Tj
-28.13 -1.125 Td
(as of the hearing date, to make significant progress on dealing with her\
overdue debts. )Tj
34.684 0 Td
(Given)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the evidence of Applicant's)Tj
-34.684 -1.125 Td
(overall poor record of dealing with her financial obligations, it was ar\
bitrary and capricious for the Judge to accept)Tj
T*
(Applicant's uncorroborated claims that she has made arrangements with he\
r creditors to resolve her outstanding debts.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
T*
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(00-0620 \(October 19, 2001\) at p. 4 \("In making findings of fact, a Ju\
dge must make a)Tj
-3.332 -1.125 Td
(reasonable, common sense evaluation about the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.299 0 Td
(significance of the presence or absence of corroborating evidence."\);)Tj
-19.299 -1.125 Td
(ISCR Case No. 99-0012 \(December 1, 1999\) at p. 3 \("Failure to present\
)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.958 0 Td
(documentation in support of an applicant's)Tj
-28.958 -1.125 Td
(claims about financial matters is a factor to be considered by a Judge i\
n evaluating such claims."\). )Tj
39.423 0 Td
(Furthermore, the)Tj
-39.423 -1.125 Td
(Judge's finding that Applicant is now able to be financially responsible\
does not reflect a reasonable interpretation of the)Tj
T*
(record)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(evidence as a whole. )Tj
11.328 0 Td
(Because it was arbitrary and capricious for the Judge to accept Applican\
t's uncorroborated)Tj
-11.328 -1.125 Td
(claims that she has made)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.191 0 Td
(arrangements with her creditors, there was not a rational basis for the \
Judge to apply Financial)Tj
-10.191 -1.125 Td
(Considerations Mitigating Condition 6.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's mitigation analysis)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 351.75 cm
0 0 m
203.807 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 219.8066 352.5 Tm
(. )Tj
(Department Counsel contends "[t]he Administrative Judge's whole-sale)Tj
-16.984 -1.125 Td
(mitigation without mention of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.277 0 Td
(specific mitigating factors is problematic.")Tj
-12.277 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel notes the Administrative Judge referred to Appendix I\
in her decision, and then suggests the Judge)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(may have been)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.247 0 Td
(erroneously referring to Appendix I of Department of Defense Regulation \
5200.2-R. )Tj
34.073 0 Td
(Even if the Judge)Tj
-40.32 -1.125 Td
(were erroneously referring to Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.909 0 Td
(of Defense Regulation 5200.2-R, the Board notes the language of the)Tj
-16.909 -1.125 Td
(Adjudicative Guidelines which appear in that regulation is identical to \
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.797 0 Td
(language of the Adjudicative Guidelines that)Tj
-29.797 -1.125 Td
(appears in the Directive. )Tj
10.023 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Judge's reference to Appendix I was harmless error.)Tj
-10.023 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel also argues the Administrative Judge should have foun\
d Applicant stole the money that was)Tj
T*
(missing from her teller drawer in)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.44 0 Td
(1995. )Tj
(As discussed earlier in this decision, the record evidence as a whole di\
d not)Tj
-13.44 -1.125 Td
(compel the Judge to find Applicant stole that money.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Finally, Department Counsel argues the Administrative Judge failed to pr\
ovide a satisfactory explanation or analysis for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(her conclusion that)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.859 0 Td
(Applicant's conduct had been mitigated. )Tj
16.287 0 Td
(Department Counsel's argument adds little to its other)Tj
-24.146 -1.125 Td
(appeal arguments. )Tj
7.525 0 Td
(Because the Board has)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.33 0 Td
(addressed Department Counsel's specific challenges to the Judge's applic\
ation)Tj
-16.855 -1.125 Td
(of various provisions of the Adjudicative Guidelines, no useful)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
25.44 0 Td
(purpose would be served by addressing this argument.)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
-3.673 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel has met its burden of demonstrating error that warran\
ts reversal. )Tj
34.406 0 Td
(Accordingly, pursuant to Item)Tj
-34.406 -1.125 Td
(E3.1.33.3 of the Directive's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.205 0 Td
(Additional Procedural Guidance, the Board reverses the Administrative Ju\
dge's favorable)Tj
-11.205 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
45 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[252.0 594.0 266.0 605.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
[48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0713.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0713.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(whole. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0620 \(October 19, 2001\) at p. 3.)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(Department Counsel correctly notes that Applicant provided contradictory\
explanations for why her 1995 termination)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(was not listed on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.471 0 Td
(security questionnaire she signed in April 1999. )Tj
19.385 0 Td
(Applicant claimed \(1\) she disclosed her 1995)Tj
-27.856 -1.125 Td
(termination when she completed the earlier)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.549 0 Td
(electronic version of the security questionnaire but it was somehow not)Tj
-17.549 -1.125 Td
(listed in the printed out version she signed in April 1999, )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
23.053 0 Td
(and)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( \(2\) she did)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(not disclose her termination on the security)Tj
-23.053 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire because she did not believe it was covered by question 20 \
on the form. )Tj
34.157 0 Td
(A review of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(decision below)Tj
-34.157 -1.125 Td
(supports Department Counsel's claim that the Judge accepted )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
24.729 0 Td
(both)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( of Applicant's explanations. )Tj
13.428 0 Td
(No deference is owed to)Tj
-38.157 -1.125 Td
(a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(favorable credibility determination that results in acceptance of an app\
licant's explanations that are patently)Tj
T*
(inconsistent and incompatible. )Tj
12.442 0 Td
(The)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Judge's finding that Applicant did not falsify the security questionnair\
e is)Tj
-12.442 -1.125 Td
(unsustainable because it does not reflect a reasonable interpretation of\
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.738 0 Td
(record evidence as a whole, including the)Tj
-29.738 -1.125 Td
(evidence that runs contrary to the Judge's finding. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.147 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.381 0 Td
(E3.1.32.1.)Tj
-41.528 -2.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's application of Personal Conduct Mitigating Condit\
ions)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 582 cm
0 0 m
376.459 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 392.459 582.75 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge listed)Tj
-31.372 -1.375 Td
(Personal Conduct Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.805 0 Td
(Conditions 2)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 219.332 570.75 Tm
( \(2\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 219.332 570 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 233.1382 566.25 Tm
( and 4)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 262.4644 570.75 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 262.4644 570 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 276.2705 566.25 Tm
( as being applicable to Applicant's case \(Decision at p. 6\). )Tj
23.367 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.056 -1.375 Td
(Judge then explained why she concluded Personal Conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.939 0 Td
(itigating Conditions 3)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 407.9395 554.25 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 407.9395 553.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 421.7456 549.75 Tm
( and 4 were applicable \(Decision at)Tj
-33.812 -1.125 Td
(p. 8\). )Tj
(Department Counsel argues: \(a\) it was arbitrary and capricious for the\
Judge)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.156 0 Td
(to list Personal Conduct Mitigating)Tj
-33.156 -1.125 Td
(Conditions 2 and 4 as being applicable, and then to fail to discuss Pers\
onal Conduct Mitigating Condition 2 at)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
44.217 0 Td
(all and)Tj
-44.217 -1.125 Td
(rely on Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3; and \(b\) the record ev\
idence does not support the )Tj
39.659 0 Td
(Judge's application)Tj
-39.659 -1.125 Td
(of Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Conduct Mitigating Conditions 3 and 4.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(a\) It was arbitrary and capricious for the Administrative Judge to li\
st Personal Conduct Mitigating Conditions 2 and 4)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(as being applicable)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.914 0 Td
(\(Decision at p. 6\), fail to discuss Personal Conduct Mitigating Condit\
ion 2 at all,)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 497.582 458.25 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 497.582 457.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 511.3882 453.75 Tm
( and then)Tj
-41.282 -1.125 Td
(proceed to rely on Personal Conduct Mitigating)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.302 0 Td
(Condition 3 in addition to Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 4)Tj
-19.302 -1.125 Td
(\(Decision at p. 8\). )Tj
7.442 0 Td
(However, the Judge's failure to list Personal Conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.481 0 Td
(itigating Condition 3 on page 6 of the decision)Tj
-28.924 -1.125 Td
(is harmless error in light of the fact the Judge gave an explanation \(o\
n page 8 of the decision\) why)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.543 0 Td
(she concluded that)Tj
-39.543 -1.125 Td
(Mitigating Condition was applicable.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(b\) Applicant falsified the security questionnaire in April 1999 and m\
ade no effort to correct her falsification until a)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Special Agent of the Defense)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.968 0 Td
(Security Service interviewed her in September 1999 and raised the matter\
of her 1995)Tj
-11.968 -1.125 Td
(termination. )Tj
5.11 0 Td
(Considering the record evidence as a whole, it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.744 0 Td
(was arbitrary and capricious for the Administrative Judge to)Tj
-23.854 -1.125 Td
(apply Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
19.527 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0201)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(October 12, 1999\) at pp. 3-4)Tj
-22.858 -1.125 Td
(\(discussing what constitutes prompt, good-faith correction of falsifica\
tion\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(As discussed earlier in this decision, Appellant gave inconsistent and i\
ncompatible explanations for why her 1995)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(termination was not listed on the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.331 0 Td
(security questionnaire she signed in April 1999. )Tj
19.385 0 Td
(Furthermore, Applicant's statements)Tj
-32.716 -1.125 Td
(that her supervisor might have removed information from her)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.854 0 Td
(security questionnaire are pure speculation and lack)Tj
-24.854 -1.125 Td
(probative value. )Tj
6.692 0 Td
(Considering the record as a whole, there is insufficient credible eviden\
ce to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.406 0 Td
(support the Administrative)Tj
-37.098 -1.125 Td
(Judge's application of Personal Conduct Mitigating Condition 4.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's application of Criminal Conduct Mitigating Condit\
ion 6)Tj
ET
0 G
q 1 0 0 1 16 214.5 cm
0 0 m
382.125 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 398.125 215.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge concluded)Tj
-31.844 -1.375 Td
(that Criminal Conduct)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.193 0 Td
(itigating Condition 6)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 226.3223 203.25 Tm
( \(6\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 226.3223 202.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 240.1284 198.75 Tm
( was applicable because she found Applicant had not engaged in criminal)Tj
-18.677 -1.125 Td
(conduct since her 1994 shoplifting incident. )Tj
17.802 0 Td
(Department Counsel argues that it was arbitrary and capricious for the)Tj
-17.802 -1.125 Td
(Judge to apply Criminal Conduct Mitigating Condition 6 because: \(a\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.051 0 Td
(Applicant stole money from a bank in 1995; and)Tj
-28.051 -1.125 Td
(\(b\) Applicant's falsification of the security questionnaire constitute\
d a violation of 18 U.S.C.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
37.228 0 Td
(\2471001. )Tj
(Department)Tj
-37.228 -1.125 Td
(Counsel's argument is partially persuasive.)Tj
T*
(The record evidence in this case did not compel the Judge to find that A\
pplicant stole money in 1995 when she was)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(working as a bank teller. )Tj
10.108 0 Td
(Given the record evidence in this case, the fact that Applicant was resp\
onsible for the money as)Tj
-10.108 -1.125 Td
(a bank teller does not mean the only possible)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.246 0 Td
(explanation for the 1995 incident was that she stole the money.)Tj
-18.246 -1.125 Td
(Accordingly, to the extent Department Counsel argues that the 1995 incid\
ent)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
30.992 0 Td
(precludes application of Criminal Conduct)Tj
-30.992 -1.125 Td
(Mitigating Condition 6, Department Counsel has failed to demonstrate the\
Judge erred.)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(However, the rest of Department Counsel's argument has merit. )Tj
25.701 0 Td
(Falsification of a security questionnaire is a violation of)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[219.0 568.0 233.0 579.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[262.0 568.0 276.0 579.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[408.0 552.0 422.0 563.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[498.0 456.0 512.0 467.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[226.0 201.0 240.0 212.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
53 0 obj
[55 0 R]
endobj
54 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0713.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0713.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:29 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(give deference to the credibility determinations of the Administrative J\
udge." )Tj
31.204 0 Td
(Directive,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
4.22 0 Td
(Additional Procedural)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741 Tm
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1. )Tj
10.775 0 Td
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a Judge's)Tj
-10.775 -1.125 Td
(findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly detracts from t\
he weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(findings. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(No. 99-0205 \(October 19, 2000\) at p. 2.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When a challenge to an Administrative Judge's rulings or conclusions rai\
ses a question of law, the Board's scope of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(review is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.386 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Case No. 87-2107 \(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal case\
s\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
14.033 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issue)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.419 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel contends the Administrative Judge's favorable securit\
y clearance decision is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
T*
(and contrary to law)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.997 0 Td
(because: \(a\) various findings of fact by the Judge are not supported b\
y substantial record evidence;)Tj
-7.997 -1.125 Td
(\(b\) the Judge misapplied various provisions of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.803 0 Td
(the Adjudicative Guidelines; and \(c\) the Judge's errors preclude)Tj
-18.803 -1.125 Td
(affirmance of her favorable security clearance decision. )Tj
22.487 0 Td
(Applicant challenges)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.664 0 Td
(Department Counsel's various arguments)Tj
-31.151 -1.125 Td
(and contends the Judge's security clearance decision should be sustained\
. )Tj
29.477 0 Td
(Discussion of the appeal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.053 0 Td
(issues will be)Tj
-39.53 -1.125 Td
(facilitated by reviewing them in terms of the different guidelines alleg\
ed in the SOR.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings about falsification allegation)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 530.25 cm
0 0 m
292.436 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 308.4355 531 Tm
(. )Tj
(The SOR alleged Applicant falsified a security)Tj
-24.37 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire in April 1999 by failing to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.414 0 Td
(disclose she had been terminated from her job as a bank teller in late 1\
995)Tj
-16.414 -1.125 Td
(because her teller drawer was short approximately $1,000 due to teller)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
28.378 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge found )Tj
15.663 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-44.041 -1.125 Td
(did not falsify the security questionnaire.)Tj
T*
(Department Counsel challenges the Administrative Judge's finding that Ap\
plicant did not falsify the security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(questionnaire. )Tj
5.887 0 Td
(Specifically, Department)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.246 0 Td
(Counsel argues: \(a\) the record evidence does not support Applicant's)Tj
-16.133 -1.125 Td
(explanation why she did not list her 1995 termination on the security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
27.772 0 Td
(questionnaire; and \(b\) the Judge failed to take into)Tj
-27.772 -1.125 Td
(account Applicant's conflicting statements about why the information abo\
ut her 1995 termination)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
39.17 0 Td
(was not listed on the)Tj
-39.17 -1.125 Td
(security questionnaire. )Tj
9.303 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board concludes Department Counsel's ar\
guments are)Tj
-9.303 -1.125 Td
(persuasive.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(There is no dispute that Applicant's 1995 termination is not listed on t\
he security questionnaire she signed on April 9,)Tj
0 -1.375 TD
(1999. )Tj
(Contrary to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.333 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal argument \(Reply Brief at pp. 3-5\), a reasonable per\
son)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 457.3633 360 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 457.3633 359.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 471.1694 355.5 Tm
( would know or should)Tj
-37.931 -1.125 Td
(know that Applicant's 1995 termination was)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.899 0 Td
(required to be listed in response to question 20 on the security)Tj
-17.899 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire. )Tj
5.887 0 Td
(The plain language of question 20 simply does not support)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.719 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal argument. )Tj
11.898 0 Td
(However)Tj
-41.504 -1.125 Td
(narrowly Applicant seeks to characterize or label the facts and circumst\
ances of her 1995 termination, a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.733 0 Td
(reasonable)Tj
-41.733 -1.125 Td
(person would know or should know that her 1995 termination fell under on\
e or more of the five categories listed in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(question 20 of the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
7.443 0 Td
(security questionnaire. )Tj
9.303 0 Td
(Since Applicant's 1995 termination should have been listed on the)Tj
-16.746 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire but was not, the issue before the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.745 0 Td
(Administrative Judge was whether Applicant falsified the security)Tj
-18.745 -1.125 Td
(questionnaire. )Tj
5.887 0 Td
(A review of the decision below shows the Judge's findings on this)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.621 0 Td
(issue turn on her conclusion that)Tj
-32.508 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's explanation is credible.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Although the Board must give deference to the credibility determinations\
made by an Administrative Judge \(Directive,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Additional Procedural)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.109 0 Td
(Guidance, Item E3.1.32.1\), that deference does not immunize credibility\
determinations from)Tj
-9.109 -1.125 Td
(review. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0710 \(March)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(19, 2001\) at p. 4. )Tj
(As the Supreme Court noted in )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
39.937 0 Td
(Anderson v. City of)Tj
-39.937 -1.125 Td
(Bessemer)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 470 U.S. 564, 575 \(1985\):)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
("[T]he trial judge may [not] insulate his findings from review by denomi\
nating them credibility determinations, for)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(factors other than demeanor and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.133 0 Td
(inflection go into the decision whether or not to believe a witness. )Tj
26.632 0 Td
(Documents or)Tj
-39.766 -1.125 Td
(objective evidence may contradict the witness' story; or the story)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.172 0 Td
(itself may be so internally inconsistent or implausible)Tj
-26.172 -1.125 Td
(on its face that a reasonable fact-finder would not credit it. )Tj
23.657 0 Td
(Where such factors are present,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
12.827 0 Td
(the court of appeals may well)Tj
-36.484 -1.125 Td
(find clear error even on a finding purportedly based on a credibility de\
termination.")Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Accordingly, whether to accept an applicant's explanation about a matter\
cannot simply turn on a Judge's assessment of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the applicant's demeanor)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.148 0 Td
(when the applicant testifies. )Tj
11.413 0 Td
(Thus, the Board must consider whether a Judge's acceptance of an)Tj
-21.562 -1.125 Td
(applicant's explanation for his or her conduct is)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
19.175 0 Td
(consistent with a reasonable interpretation of the record evidence as a)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
55 0 obj
<>/BS<>/Border[0 0 0]/PA<>/Rect[457.0 357.0 471.0 368.0]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>
endobj
56 0 obj
<>
endobj
9 0 obj
<>
endobj
10 0 obj
<>
endobj
11 0 obj
<>
endobj
65 0 obj
(file:///usr.osd.mil/Home/OSD/OGC/JosephLM/_MyComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archived%20-%20HTML/00-0713.a1.html)
endobj
64 0 obj
<>
endobj
66 0 obj
<>
endobj
57 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 459.0 null]
endobj
58 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 420.0 null]
endobj
59 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 381.0 null]
endobj
60 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 342.0 null]
endobj
61 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 317.0 null]
endobj
62 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 264.0 null]
endobj
63 0 obj
[17 0 R/XYZ 0 239.0 null]
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
xref
0 67
0000000000 65535 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000141 00000 n
0000003657 00000 n
0000158372 00000 n
0000003535 00000 n
0000003590 00000 n
0000003737 00000 n
0000003764 00000 n
0000157391 00000 n
0000157629 00000 n
0000157671 00000 n
0000157203 00000 n
0000004501 00000 n
0000148141 00000 n
0000136506 00000 n
0000127304 00000 n
0000124294 00000 n
0000003867 00000 n
0000003913 00000 n
0000003962 00000 n
0000004194 00000 n
0000004034 00000 n
0000004066 00000 n
0000004098 00000 n
0000004130 00000 n
0000004162 00000 n
0000004712 00000 n
0000010298 00000 n
0000010347 00000 n
0000010382 00000 n
0000010982 00000 n
0000011419 00000 n
0000070629 00000 n
0000070896 00000 n
0000037563 00000 n
0000037836 00000 n
0000011836 00000 n
0000012112 00000 n
0000012524 00000 n
0000038300 00000 n
0000071512 00000 n
0000124494 00000 n
0000127529 00000 n
0000127554 00000 n
0000136181 00000 n
0000136720 00000 n
0000136773 00000 n
0000146516 00000 n
0000146841 00000 n
0000147166 00000 n
0000147491 00000 n
0000147816 00000 n
0000148366 00000 n
0000148391 00000 n
0000156878 00000 n
0000157288 00000 n
0000158078 00000 n
0000158120 00000 n
0000158162 00000 n
0000158204 00000 n
0000158246 00000 n
0000158288 00000 n
0000158330 00000 n
0000157878 00000 n
0000157713 00000 n
0000158025 00000 n
trailer
<<574141CA3F098F49A717FA56DDAA566A>]>>
startxref
158544
%%EOF