%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:12:38-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:38-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:38-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
00-0754.a1
uuid:f9f3153c-8d42-4832-816d-43b8ccbd2f23
uuid:24ee2fd6-67b2-4a12-b759-dc9c06a20ef9
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(00-0754.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/00-0754.a1.html)Tj
49.74 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:38 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 25, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 00-0754)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated Ma\
y 24, 2001, in which she concluded it is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearly consistent with the national interest to grant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.716 0 Td
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
18.769 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-39.485 -1.125 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Ju\
dge's decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge failed to consider certain)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evidence presented by Applicant; and \(2\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.658 0 Td
(Administrative Judge's adverse decision is arbitrary, capricious, or)Tj
-21.658 -1.125 Td
(contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated December 22, 2000 to)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(Criminal Conduct\), Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\), and Guideline F)Tj
-4.443 -1.125 Td
(\(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he indicated he wante\
d a decision made without a hearing. )Tj
44.96 0 Td
(A File)Tj
-44.96 -1.125 Td
(of Relevant Material \(FORM\) was prepared. )Tj
18.078 0 Td
(A)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(copy of the FORM was provided to Applicant. )Tj
19.886 0 Td
(No response to the)Tj
-37.964 -1.125 Td
(FORM was received from Applicant. )Tj
15.163 0 Td
(The case was then assigned to the Administrative Judge for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.994 0 Td
(consideration. )Tj
5.887 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.044 -1.125 Td
(Judge issued a written decision, dated May 24, 2001, in which she conclu\
ded it is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(interest to grant or continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.996 0 Td
(security clearance for Applicant.)Tj
-11.996 -2.125 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.073 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(#xj54f=;)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CR =@j+]`q~$K+ccw?kW}:W*U:ӪZϟ84%C\3ׁO'"LcLF(12H>`.K2|=Ѓ<3ӣTG&C̵PZeUJfE6AS=G
w
` E
endstream
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=ņ;^bł]4D+%Dňb^b+{+v?5}z+9kggϚoo"#4j5_WH+iᑱqP0&r