pţe}ڱ1:5NX=!cTW;h^:(F . ;FGP2=j{a>+Dh rp
{-* KmPTA-XX
i [Aj:T pO>k 3߬}c1^ucҽ[Зʣh*#yoo smUR {>پ`xe9=<ksebmMIM_31<{ܸ_!br9ٗ {6Nkƻ b}A.\scY+tM"dbjٯٹ5N% 3y-d =o<{6> j˓IW[nSS$ԏ{G$~D/ٟa =$ԏe IO.Ps[Kf b[~۶_Lr s:lE}qJvG}36c\%Ű9ό߂ kmۣyg ?7Fo{ )N i ߠ#'bA%3uɼouy+9!K#i|bR|pbR{ ~zyKEP'^yU2Sh + b|2c2~S59UcrS_E @\FRTW8ڈHtK"v MH.qS;2,V=+czx JM2+`WǶZyBJ [cc@cnW5zR)e>c }GJs k$?}>&U9R 4J6ǎ:]Aڷ?Nzf
%/751_"Enh:vc8?s%o%uM4117fY5rߊ?Q vNQ)[?gP Wb'=@,_'MihZOUcx{{$Aհ4gr/益F{(OmWE_M[?ž=7ocFde:i7]eG 4dHOa郎 YSc 2h
߳v/Գ"i;tuOGi`{[R_'ltߝ,9-'u{/Ȯ'-Vβ;OI{21 u,g{sMn 1|('wK1ҦCE1{
?TG£aZف ` Hj3K|~}E}wosφ;&by ?,z+,Ŝ*|dcPo9opt9Y`h4<}:cޭ.8>5j7ľ/gz%osǫm꽝V== z #'u;Q!9m-4gٸU*-Voe"oN2`_|4e?Xf9ћC U?]h<\ q
R>4w>Ђ5\lI o5H; 1q $En 絞sq߭\˷ pmRzJ'v9mdM͋3ٖlީ,ָA8tdN?ܢhlb3<2ūZSG ;9/yiL\ϕՁO)ε2_u[FLK49oxf>(Y-]n!8jxZf/Ot`LQi,DOվ>UBqF2n+dPzy-l9k]| *K2H}jVsT~jg
e |(+w] D5x;/ >=GTyeXm:8 I֘g}!GRs4|orApSFjn1 Mmh>o?nj{i_LT⬅M*Kd8UHm5qI}Y[bdܾ1N0/M`w9sݜ*tj~ s.R5ufԚ8sOI#g)Ҹ:ײls(F!nnyؼ_Vq&pw4 %^>"3xY0p#ok-XOKk5[ P F1#NeJ/Qk_i1|[ Ni58],ڵȳYY]zEqOy!E.Km߂߁^b\ĺfq {
0[6_f\; $I|v*ͱ9!?x-sXSe\ݬL{H?l g濙
m}`t og{?Fb{m U"ֿ,WLw3͡
7:cs5BLob0³x=Vi$S 6:F\;A- V@9AM۰L?)_M} ,EO=K~'`=FOy!q0Z|ɕ:N[y9cMʼn^! mhNt4X
Փ]Zlqy
Xg_c侙'̠"
.P!DƧ,_&=y{t=O^ }>c c)!j' gvh/h'hQ<{zc,u_'|1=^vrZC/95ma_!6[4}ZoHP%/>KtGK
4=; zSXw.
{jL"*Z_3Sw 2Iy[Cju ]7OzRiHo |RvCRr3 j[ ;1ߪtЎek
$Nfѱ]jwL}Ntt[/u)w;|n1ܭ*
r#05ޡ˒ .f$'9>|;@rcZ~iy]j 5T>8IT+||?zk=ɹ}
9E;%ޡ;Yh@|}_,Ɲk'&?R/fCjPS6㇣]F' _ݡ2>+h_0IT
:\XΫ'nӶ_Hy+r<_d5.˓f^\iMCϒ{-4,DW)QmpףȍV0\b!V{J AYw}ۗyXq ʙ+%nz(蘁qq`-]ȼ`K% {e;}=:@:y>qq^BOƇbf>nwKwg aw !R: ߬5Oãx1{-(t0|B{Aj_96̅o:헕K0R l;57#jm
a3La%CkaqͲ{7z=
܂~[t0}'|ƛX]k<]E}܃~ͅouD/3}Y*rwNbȠC}c^^q݈vas/#Nx fbQ1w#5-Ec;i66 ~ǶuUqw4b4ݼҵ& KGCcDΏeAj/Nn AZmjdel"%n !!@b&F^$+[s9:5 p_ < ﰿ
E=?OI/%X͂)pabes_D FrWF2 9_x֢9K!nJtnUvmB
@hDwa;OݍXn
;b.~#E#EZʹc
u m v܍''J~0Y} c_FՏEDwD&z5| ykD㇉Nߙ
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(
BP(n_:%- D7]om2.$R 0Zlf' Jc`_p?wk!Ƭpq֨dcTVrlc`uo86ֳ` =KTC۩Vzɂn&R GG(-={2
BfT!$>A ee˂}2.3
|ESwv0F?0Ǹ6LP v v<|n5ƹV-mkb4r9b 1F&z1;'QG閵Ԁv"yqlg\2hLW1 fg YqY9hĚDu_Jvo 1t\Jh6K Q߇簊zfQ~هSvJ+*W)މ\Eo>=5kyv I[|Iۙh.ax(퉞\[Y+s؊WqoueAޚR' =bxIxN Ɉ>\ _ov+o&ӽ|4c}6ٽ) 3EzY8v7$X4ɝccR21 ;7X| 2<'DJe]tmЉQЏ9l@9ze7T855ҍ7RcGYRt Q
V
L(0*7
ٜb66! !gHYe] 8`{uS?yLD +}&^@+ªuEE.sGZ2j.^z]Q#/Tb i)X,>kR
#q]5{5%R+cۨ^2;ccKܴ!
Nv ?gA'҉E -/ -</AH8Nd.2GOhe5ia& d]?
&} lƉ %2>-sfcAW uTvRNVjP
O/_:vx$j/L[jRC U.}+ W#IH[5BNLeLX"ggvquq]"hMJykOH 9ۇ>8HԃNnzuC
& u9e[r/[Z
y%xKRn57?l27`ƤCFkȨ m˥,R{K)?gZ|- }NI$bitFi i
SRR{E^-|E{b$-_Wi^z6mE{vBCa(R)7cVT-c'q*5PICWRihEZ
iFXjqX$*a0m
2&6!mݹNǏԗI99={m -
1}/t^vzi M{W_@j9<3JJ^j
1
I(АFH4$K`J $IU
CInjXI
@c6+l4`uOE
VW`((@ +RRPR\T˱Q ʁͰag2.gn &DZN w
C`mP̰}[ 6샲,e+ԝ&JY}p2z&!g <37uq
h85c6{2i.g\6bV@ˌX"dGwgdGSDÂKT-V٫@%.8Եuˮ M
e kI $|XTAXg{Rfk [O)AyPl 䜒kM{z^w#J92i[iBɴ6+ƴ mJyMrҘ4!MI%:tmJEbqZp-v E: |/1ve F^vgo л [[ >
rm%47ʍs7MLZ E/6Q tsk 2 gE5J( [Zċ] A¶-a'im/uo f^b@/UQ HGM>1Z -ȏ ?<lX=V U B)PW X LN!
=gO1". < Vo# d
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 4/Type/Page>>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-00677.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-00677.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:13:05 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 751.5 Tm
(It is not necessary for an Administrative Judge to find that an applican\
t is a "clear and present danger" to national)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(security before the Judge can make an adverse )Tj
18.825 0 Td
(security clearance decision. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.272 0 Td
(See Adams v. Laird)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, 420 F.2d 230, 238-239)Tj
-30.097 -1.125 Td
(\(D.C. Cir. 1969\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(cert. denied)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
11.803 0 Td
(, 397 U.S. 1039 \(1970\). )Tj
(In this case, the Judge )Tj
18.748 0 Td
(articulated a rational basis why the facts and)Tj
-30.551 -1.125 Td
(circumstances of Applicant's case raised security concerns under Guideli\
ne B and Guideline C. )Tj
38.279 0 Td
(Furthermore, the )Tj
6.97 0 Td
(Judge)Tj
-45.249 -1.125 Td
(articulated reasons why those security concerns were not satisfactorily \
resolved. )Tj
32.294 0 Td
(If a Judge is faced with unresolved)Tj
-32.294 -1.125 Td
(security concerns or doubts that have )Tj
15.106 0 Td
(a rational basis in the record evidence, the Judge acts properly by reso\
lving them)Tj
-15.106 -1.125 Td
(in favor of the national security. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
13.079 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Item E2.2.2 \("Any doubt as to )Tj
18.153 0 Td
(whether access to classified information is)Tj
-31.232 -1.125 Td
(clearly consistent with national security will be resolved in favor of n\
ational security."\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(Applicant has failed to demonstrate error below. )Tj
19.604 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's adverse)Tj
-19.604 -1.125 Td
(security clearance decision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 566.25 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 541.5 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 464.25 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 439.5 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 362.25 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 337.5 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(Apart from the problem of identifying which DOHA decision Applicant is r\
eferring to, )Tj
36.047 0 Td
(Applicant's argument about)Tj
-36.047 -1.125 Td
(character testimony and an applicant's )Tj
15.479 0 Td
(statements is not persuasive. )Tj
11.637 0 Td
(The weight given to character testimony and an)Tj
-27.116 -1.125 Td
(applicant's statements in another case is no measure of what weight the \
)Tj
28.671 0 Td
(Administrative Judge should give to similar)Tj
-28.671 -1.125 Td
(evidence in Applicant's case.)Tj
T*
(2. )Tj
(One of the Administrative Judge decisions cited by Applicant \(ISCR Case\
No. 99-0532\) was reversed by the Board)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(on February 27, 2001. )Tj
(Accordingly, that )Tj
16.358 0 Td
(decision has no persuasive authority with the Board.)Tj
-16.358 -2.125 Td
(3. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
4.332 0 Td
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0516 \(December 7, 2001\) at p. 5 \(legality of an ap\
plicant's actions does not preclude)Tj
-4.332 -1.125 Td
(consideration of the security significance of )Tj
17.771 0 Td
(the applicant's actions\); ISCR Case No. 99-0511 \(December 19, 2000\) a\
t p.)Tj
-17.771 -1.125 Td
(12 \("An applicant's good intentions do not trump the negative security \
implications )Tj
33.527 0 Td
(of conduct or circumstances)Tj
-33.527 -1.125 Td
(indicative of foreign influence \(Guideline B\) or foreign preference \(\
Guideline C\)."\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(4. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(Cf)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. 22 U.S.C. Sections 611\(b\) and 611\(c\)\(definitions of "foreign prin\
cipal" and "agent of a foreign principal"\).)Tj
T*
(5. )Tj
(For example, alcohol abuse, a history of financial difficulties, or fals\
ification have security significance even if an)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(applicant's conduct is motivated purely by personal, private reasons.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-00677.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-00677.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:13:05 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to )Tj
15.772 0 Td
(law for the Administrative Judge to consider the security significance o\
f)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(Applicant's past and present involvement with FC softball activities. )Tj
27.564 0 Td
(The basic )Tj
4.109 0 Td
(security concerns raised by the )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
12.579 0 Td
(nature)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( of)Tj
-44.252 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's involvement with FC softball activities are not materially d\
iminished merely because the )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
40.531 0 Td
(frequency)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.942 0 Td
( of his)Tj
-44.474 -1.125 Td
(involvement may decrease in the future. )Tj
16.299 0 Td
(Stated otherwise, actions indicative of a foreign preference under Guide\
line C)Tj
-16.299 -1.125 Td
(do not lose their security significance )Tj
15.218 0 Td
(merely because they may continue in the future with diminished frequency\
.)Tj
-15.218 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge specifically considered Applicant's personal an\
d family ties with )Tj
36.698 0 Td
(the United States. )Tj
7.332 0 Td
(The)Tj
-44.03 -1.125 Td
(presence of such favorable evidence did not )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(preclude the Judge from considering the security significance of Applica\
nt's)Tj
-17.798 -1.125 Td
(conduct under Guideline C. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.303 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0489 \(January 10, 2002\) )Tj
(at p. 10. )Tj
(Applicant's argument fails to)Tj
-11.303 -1.125 Td
(persuade the Board that the Judge weighed that evidence in a manner that\
is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge erred by concluding Applicant is suscep\
tible to foreign influence under Guideline)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 609 cm
0 0 m
559.834 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 596.25 Tm
(B)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 595.5 cm
0 0 m
8.004 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 24.0039 596.25 Tm
(. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge concluded )Tj
15.496 0 Td
(Applicant was at risk of being vulnerable to foreign influence because:)Tj
-16.163 -2.125 Td
(\(a\) Applicant has professional and personal ties to two high-level FC \
softball officials;)Tj
T*
(\(b\) Applicant "shares a particularly close personal relationship" with\
one of the two high-level FC softball officials;)Tj
T*
(\(c\) Applicant maintains contacts with those two officials even during \
the off-season; and)Tj
T*
(\(d\) Applicant's activities as an FC representative at international to\
urnaments and as a non-voting delegate at meetings)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(increases his vulnerability to possible )Tj
15.247 0 Td
(coercion or pressure.)Tj
-15.247 -2.125 Td
(The Judge concluded that because of Applicant's "ongoing relationship wi\
th these foreign nationals, the risk of undue)Tj
T*
(influence cannot be completely )Tj
12.772 0 Td
(discounted.")Tj
-12.772 -2.125 Td
(Applicant contends the Administrative Judge erred by concluding he is su\
sceptible to foreign influence under Guideline)Tj
T*
(B. )Tj
(In support of that contention, )Tj
13.054 0 Td
(Applicant argues:)Tj
-13.054 -2.125 Td
(\(i\) there is nothing about his relationships with the two high-level F\
C softball officials that would suggest he is subject)Tj
T*
(to undue influence;)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(ii\) there is no evidence that the two officials are agents of FC who \
could cause Applicant to compromise his allegiance)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(to the United States;)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(iii\) his contacts with the two officials "have only developed during \
the last few years," are infrequent, and only revolve)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(around softball; and)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(iv\) his decreasing involvement with the FC softball program will dimi\
nish his contacts with the two officials.)Tj
T*
(Department Counsel contends the Administrative Judge made no legal error\
s with respect to Guideline B. )Tj
42.545 0 Td
(In support of)Tj
-42.545 -1.125 Td
(that contention, Department Counsel )Tj
14.969 0 Td
(argues the facts support the Judge's adverse conclusions under Guideline\
B.)Tj
-14.969 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's arguments fail to demonstrate the Administrative Judge's ana\
lysis under Guideline B is arbitrary, capricious,)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(or contrary to law. )Tj
7.636 0 Td
(First, the Judge )Tj
(articulated a rational basis, supported by the record evidence, for conc\
luding)Tj
-7.636 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's relationships with two high-level FC softball officials rais\
e security )Tj
32.007 0 Td
(concerns under Guideline B. )Tj
11.691 0 Td
(Second,)Tj
-43.698 -1.125 Td
(the fact that those relationships revolve around softball is not materia\
l. )Tj
28.437 0 Td
(As discussed under Guideline C, the security)Tj
-28.437 -1.125 Td
(significance of the facts and circumstances of Applicant's case does not\
turn on the nature of softball. )Tj
40.722 0 Td
(Third, Applicant's)Tj
-40.722 -1.125 Td
(relationships with two high-level FC )Tj
14.916 0 Td
(softball officials are not totally independent of his actions in further\
ance of FC)Tj
-14.916 -1.125 Td
(softball activities. )Tj
7.359 0 Td
(Given the Judge's findings about the degree of Applicant's )Tj
23.549 0 Td
(commitment to furthering the interests of)Tj
-30.909 -1.125 Td
(FC softball activities as a means to realize his dream of umpiring at th\
e Olympics, it was not arbitrary or capricious )Tj
46.376 0 Td
(for)Tj
-46.376 -1.125 Td
(the Judge to conclude that the role of the two high-level FC softball of\
ficials could place them in a position to exercise)Tj
T*
(influence over Applicant. )Tj
10.44 0 Td
(Fourth, )Tj
(under Guideline B, foreign influence is not limited to influence exercis\
ed through)Tj
-10.44 -1.125 Td
(coercion or duress; rather it can include noncoercive forms of influence\
. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
29.099 0 Td
(See, )Tj
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0317 \(March 29,)Tj
-29.099 -1.125 Td
(2002\) at p. 6.)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
[46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R]
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-00677.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-00677.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:13:05 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(programs in the United States and only )Tj
15.858 0 Td
(occurs during limited time periods";)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 729.75 Tm
(\(v\) the motivation for his ongoing involvement with FC softball progra\
ms stems from humanitarian motives, and he has)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not sought any financial benefit or )Tj
13.996 0 Td
(personal gain for his actions;)Tj
-13.996 -2.125 Td
(\(vi\) his involvement with FC softball does not raise security concerns\
because the evidence shows he has served "only)Tj
T*
(as an advisor," he does not set policy for )Tj
16.46 0 Td
(the program, he never has had voting rights when appearing at conference\
s,)Tj
-16.46 -1.125 Td
(and his role will diminish in the future; and)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(vii\) he has lived his entire life in the United States, has been educ\
ated in the United States, his immediate family is in)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the United States, and he has no ties or )Tj
15.774 0 Td
(loyalties to any place other than the United States.)Tj
-15.774 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel contends the Administrative Judge made no legal error\
s with respect to Guideline C. )Tj
42.545 0 Td
(In support of)Tj
-42.545 -1.125 Td
(that contention, Department Counsel )Tj
14.969 0 Td
(argues: the Judge's findings are not in dispute; the facts of Applicant'\
s case fall)Tj
-14.969 -1.125 Td
(under the Concern section of Guideline C \(Foreign Preference\); and the\
totality )Tj
31.99 0 Td
(of the Applicant's conduct shows a)Tj
-31.99 -1.125 Td
(foreign preference.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge's analysis of the facts and circumstances of Ap\
plicant's case under Guideline C is not)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(Applicant chose to participate in international softball activities as a\
)Tj
-16.188 -1.125 Td
(representative of FC, not the United States. )Tj
17.524 0 Td
(The fact that softball is a sport or that )Tj
15.246 0 Td
(participation in international sporting)Tj
-32.77 -1.375 Td
(events is not inherently objectionable is not significant.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 281.2773 494.25 Tm
( \(3\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 281.2773 493.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 295.0835 489.75 Tm
( )Tj
(What is significant to this case is that Applicant's actions)Tj
-23.257 -1.125 Td
(show )Tj
(he has chosen to act as a representative of FC in international softball\
activities and has made a significant)Tj
T*
(personal commitment toward advancing the interests )Tj
21.383 0 Td
(of FC in international softball activities. )Tj
16.247 0 Td
(As a matter of common)Tj
-37.63 -1.125 Td
(sense and practical experience, a national sports team and national spor\
ts officials act as )Tj
35.459 0 Td
(representatives of their country)Tj
-35.459 -1.125 Td
(in international sporting activities and are perceived as such. )Tj
24.436 0 Td
(A person who chooses to act as a representative of a)Tj
-24.436 -1.125 Td
(foreign )Tj
(country or foreign entity shows a commitment to act on behalf of, and in\
furtherance of, the interests of that)Tj
T*
(foreign country or foreign entity. )Tj
13.44 0 Td
(Furthermore, a )Tj
6.192 0 Td
(person who chooses to act as a representative of a foreign country or)Tj
-19.633 -1.375 Td
(foreign entity is an agent of that foreign country or foreign entity, at\
least for purposes of )Tj
35.823 0 Td
(the representation.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 534.502 396.75 Tm
( \(4\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 534.502 396 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 548.3081 392.25 Tm
( )Tj
(Given)Tj
-44.359 -1.125 Td
(the record evidence in this case, the Judge had a rational basis for con\
cluding the facts and circumstances of Applicant's)Tj
T*
(participation in FC softball activities demonstrates a foreign preferenc\
e within the meaning of Guideline C.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant correctly notes he does not have, and has never possessed an F\
C passport. )Tj
33.992 0 Td
(However, the Administrative Judge)Tj
-33.992 -1.125 Td
(had a rational basis for finding that )Tj
14.246 0 Td
(Applicant actively sought to obtain FC citizenship, but was thwarted in \
obtaining it)Tj
-14.246 -1.125 Td
(only because he was unable to obtain certain documentation. )Tj
24.547 0 Td
(Serious )Tj
(security concerns are raised when a U.S. citizen)Tj
-24.547 -1.125 Td
(voluntarily obtains foreign citizenship. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
15.747 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 98-0331 \(May 26, 1999\) at p. 7. )Tj
(The security)Tj
-15.747 -1.125 Td
(significance of Applicant's effort to obtain FC citizenship is not mater\
ially diminished by the fact that he failed to)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(achieve his objective. )Tj
8.885 0 Td
(It was not arbitrary, )Tj
8.136 0 Td
(capricious, or contrary to law for the Judge to consider, under the whol\
e)Tj
-17.021 -1.125 Td
(person concept, the security significance of Applicant's failed effort t\
o obtain FC )Tj
32.587 0 Td
(citizenship, which was undertaken in)Tj
-32.587 -1.125 Td
(connection with Applicant's efforts to advance and enhance his role in F\
C softball activities.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant notes his motivation has been to achieve personal goals and ar\
gues that the nature of his motivation removes)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(his conduct from the realm of Guideline )Tj
16.301 0 Td
(C. )Tj
(The personal nature of Applicant's motivation is not significant. )Tj
26.953 0 Td
(As a general)Tj
-43.253 -1.125 Td
(proposition, the mere fact that an applicant is motivated by purely pers\
onal )Tj
30.241 0 Td
(desires or goals does not immunize the)Tj
-30.241 -1.375 Td
(applicant's conduct from scrutiny for its possible security significance\
.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 354.4082 180.75 Tm
( \(5\))Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 354.4082 180 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 368.2144 176.25 Tm
( )Tj
(A foreign preference under Guideline C can)Tj
-29.351 -1.125 Td
(be )Tj
(demonstrated even if the person's conduct is motivated by personal conve\
nience or personal reasons. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
41.723 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR)Tj
-45.054 -1.125 Td
(Case No. 01-01331 \(February 27, 2002\) at )Tj
(p. 3; ISCR Case No. 99-0424 \(February 8, 2001\) at p. 13. )Tj
40.494 0 Td
(Similarly, a person)Tj
-40.494 -1.125 Td
(who chooses to act as a representative of a foreign country or entity is\
no less an )Tj
32.407 0 Td
(agent of the foreign country or entity)Tj
-32.407 -1.125 Td
(merely because the person undertook the representation for purely person\
al reasons. Applicant has chosen to act as a)Tj
T*
(representative of FC in international softball activities in order to ac\
hieve his personal goals. )Tj
37.239 0 Td
(The personal nature of)Tj
-37.239 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's motivation does not )Tj
12.957 0 Td
(significantly diminish the consequences of his actions -- that he has ch\
osen to act as an)Tj
-12.957 -1.125 Td
(FC representative in international sporting activities and, in doing so,\
)Tj
27.939 0 Td
(he has chosen to represent the interests of FC in)Tj
-27.939 -1.125 Td
(those activities.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Time will tell whether Applicant's involvement with FC softball activiti\
es diminishes in the future. )Tj
39.757 0 Td
(In any event, it was)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
46 0 obj
<>/BS<