%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:12:58-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:58-04:00
2021-07-02T14:12:58-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-00407.a1
uuid:1bd1c735-65da-4069-aac2-d669880f446e
uuid:caf8893f-ec30-41cf-8a4c-2dc8518cde96
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-00407.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-00407.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:12:58 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 18, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-00407)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.734 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn Antigone Trowbridge, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.511 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-1.361 -2.2 Td
(Kenneth C. Smith, Jr., Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Barry M. Sax issued a decision, dated May 1, 2002, \
in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or )Tj
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-36.515 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by denying Applicant a)Tj
T*
(security clearance based on 10 U.S.C. )Tj
15.412 0 Td
(\247986; and \(2\) whether the Board should recommend that Applicant's c\
ase be)Tj
-15.412 -1.125 Td
(considered for a waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986 if the Board concludes A\
pplicant's )Tj
32.672 0 Td
(case falls under that statute. )Tj
11.329 0 Td
(The Board)Tj
-44.001 -1.125 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance decision, \
and does not recommend that Applicant's case )Tj
47.344 0 Td
(be)Tj
-47.344 -1.125 Td
(considered for a waiver under 10 U.S.C. \247986.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 24,)Tj
T*
(2001. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline J )Tj
16.915 0 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\). )Tj
8.36 0 Td
(A hearing was held on March 12, 2002. )Tj
16.107 0 Td
(The)Tj
-41.382 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated May 1, 2002, in wh\
ich he concluded it )Tj
37.27 0 Td
(is not clearly consistent)Tj
-37.27 -1.125 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for\
Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Administrati\
ve Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp. )Tj
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
(@N:75E\\7n)
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H\j@}l/ug@0:Ifwt?Yg~v
?ov6Chs{;v!n6zTG;máϪi<ƫYn-pt7ֻ[.i'ҵvH^>˧mzj?:+9eP7pct,3ҳlh>UҒxM^OiI\=\K'{@~ /?)Sn0Jy{{yyyyyyyy:x83
2
̼¼w.fdfdfdfdgr2"STx*=JOSTx*no`Ҵm.1~i.1]fpf_ _
endstream
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H|XsfQ`ٝ݅ņkр/yIQAAA;ElXQ,("*6e*F<1Y¾%}g=93@ @evU[XD\x|ں 9b\F#o%qyt 4Jph?,vBt?! ^Y1Q'- 綮a