%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:14:01-04:00
2021-07-02T14:14:01-04:00
2021-07-02T14:14:01-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-02407.a1
uuid:0a8233be-e4d8-48f4-a67a-ee7f7ac409c0
uuid:df4754ee-d9c8-49ab-8806-4273a9433881
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-02407.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-02407.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:14:01 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 13, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-02407)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-3.526 -2.2 Td
(Marc E. Curry, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
-3.32 -2.2 Td
(William S Fields, Esq., Deputy Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.624 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.125 -2.2 Td
(Kirk T. Mosley, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 394.5 Tm
(Administrative Judge Richard A. Cefola issued a decision, dated August 2\
, 2002, in which he concluded that it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\) dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.995 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-14.995 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: 1. Whether th\
e Administrative Judge's findings of fact were)Tj
T*
(both supported by record evidence and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.772 0 Td
(reasonable in light of contrary evidence; 2. Whether the Administrative \
Judge's)Tj
-15.772 -1.125 Td
(credibility determination regarding Applicant is sustainable in light of\
the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.715 0 Td
(record evidence; and 3. Whether the)Tj
-29.715 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge's analysis of Applicant's provision of alcohol to m\
inors was unsustainable piecemeal analysis. )Tj
46.602 0 Td
(For)Tj
-46.602 -1.125 Td
(the reasons that follow, the Board reverses the Judge's favorable decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issue a Statement of Reasons \
\(SOR\) to Applicant, dated February 14,)Tj
T*
(2002. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.915 0 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\), Guideline D \(Sexual Behavior\), and Guideline E)Tj
-16.915 -1.125 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
8.249 0 Td
(Applicant requested a hearing which was held on July 10, 2002. )Tj
25.855 0 Td
(Subsequently the Administrative)Tj
-34.104 -1.125 Td
(Judge issued a favorable decision, dated August 2, 2002. )Tj
22.939 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on the Department Counsel's)Tj
-22.939 -1.125 Td
(appeal of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
3.942 0 Td
(that decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
16.882 -2.125 Td
(Scope of review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.824 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39 Tm
(pp.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(rN\nC\)5)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\ϊ0yCѺ5iAa>MƮߙL
:_o3cRϵg40ˮw64ނyk67}fhHYu(
|4EvZ$oBUf-fʲ:|K_d6~^6\<,,cFo
]A)^,xvwDQ8M W{E9syǼ#Ιsd*5&3#=y*T"cAfM49hv"fM>aO/33p\s .ů *
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H|XsbCA{/,ػhD#yKbLDXhbDE`/
XQ,{^^ŨOMw@/97;3gfg}̀ C!QU83gI k"h-J:Q1ݣ;~(gh7@T4v1@^rxa@ۢ=(vR2ֶ&٧_D⓴+G1^37.doxtdO2 hc
Rv]{"܀BSuPBݞ"UQTVjbqYV):H˒F׆[iG0(+M>E夸+RPLQ
rw ]3y)Zx ϒK-[|?n*WZ5j֪]n
6j$ih٪u>>?_m:CаptսG^DA?;tO?12n/nj0~BI$M6}Y̝.JNYd+VZk֮[a[o۞cݙ{G;~Y8s/UZu
H_uFPbQ:)kٟ;x"i~)j
k5TNPՇ^~74/2u?AFwЇ9ݮ?_ynɖLSkhkuuMJJJt[e[U[;[-_0ixF#f5>Fo$Fhd; qŸ"0,0"0*w`j#TojM.5=5usr|\]AfVyoLŪ| a/9L%ůDqR;xu:URArw/s9L-z;=P=Nߪ/gK,QA$K k5ޚCIɡC[!_py!H6VpLr,94~!2V}S}Rm iVהrJ6y(-Ok#^㥴N--ԭ7sΙcˀ; R7r6psqvrtp~t|p}Yٳg'"}gJfvpv GGkG(v=ߵ*x~ȞimOA2z{k{{s{f73r7LR(r_iOeR-u>}[+dO=enj_cU]_}Ϻ$90`*>xlY y_鿗4QX_?WvXxQaa,K hLSbf#\zXxX58CX@"qGq
q'qQ8:tcLy9`