%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:14:18-04:00
2021-07-02T14:14:18-04:00
2021-07-02T14:14:18-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-02871.a1
uuid:a0f3eb80-c3fb-4965-9755-07427691be17
uuid:fbf34423-2848-4588-8280-227320096eb0
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-02871.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-02871.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:14:18 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: January 8, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-02871)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Wilford H. Ross issued a decision dated July 10, 20\
02, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.746 0 Td
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
18.769 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-36.515 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issue: Whether the Administrat\
ive Judge's findings and conclusions are)Tj
T*
(supported by the record evidence?)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated November 9,)Tj
T*
(2001. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.915 0 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
23.106 0 Td
(A hearing was held)Tj
-40.021 -1.125 Td
(on March 29, 2002.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision dated July 10, 2002, \
in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp.)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary evidence. \
)Tj
27.908 0 Td
(In making this review,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
9.248 0 Td
(the Appeal Board shall)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(XawÑYmdk)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq-)Y9 t1{OC3eϭ5TcyyX?6*tQ:I-sĄ A96Ozq荽s?8
P@]ƁH*GdVSބeG!}ͨIB/(h .jVWY?o8⢠@dn"3ˇS .3OOs*.ɘ8V)Dh
Y44rc;nr@ٯ
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H| Tn3ݨ
.3M܂\CKbLd(QqG+댃]Чw{Nuݺw @"}զ}UDb 8l^
hP; hI 6L:^5| ~`tdXģ)Kf];Pz*Z's̘0(-ilXBbP/ qJܘV# q"6;(^S (|5*u?eB J `g
!J-44j!x( 0
k"gͻ"Tڜ|`%z;8:94lָIfFR?jޢeiۮo~:wͿ{OzݧoO?oݐ#"G9*&v8ab¤?