%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:14:53-04:00
2021-07-02T14:14:52-04:00
2021-07-02T14:14:53-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-03359.a1
uuid:4775f1c6-7444-4f30-a599-346c418ca7a6
uuid:ffcc8a0d-6f29-4afd-9000-16c0ded053d4
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-03359.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-03359.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:14:53 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 25, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-03359)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr., issued a decision, dated March 6\
, 2002, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to )Tj
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's )Tj
27.924 0 Td
(decision.)Tj
-27.924 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding Applicant)Tj
T*
(falsified a security questionnaire; and \(2\) )Tj
16.661 0 Td
(whether the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance decision i\
s)Tj
-16.661 -1.125 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated July 12, 2001.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline J )Tj
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which she stated she "would\
like a decision made without a hearing." )Tj
46.584 0 Td
(A)Tj
-46.584 -1.125 Td
(File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) was )Tj
15.886 0 Td
(prepared. )Tj
(A copy of the FORM was provided to Applicant, who was given the)Tj
-15.886 -1.125 Td
(opportunity to respond to the FORM and present information for considera\
tion )Tj
31.8 0 Td
(by an Administrative Judge. )Tj
11.526 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-43.326 -1.125 Td
(submitted a response to the FORM.)Tj
T*
(The Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated March 6, 2002,\
in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant or )Tj
18.829 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse security clearance decisi\
on.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
(LmkjƳet)
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>
endobj
37 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI61i9e{V7='Y͡q{L3-3^6]*!v86TYBA9,l3T,]nW7pD7C
U{
nDHۺt>˚|G~#ŘwC.ʔVVVν*3)Zf>
wdsY4;dED&C,q
SB`y/g>%oy05[jEs/:Θ6͵iAs
ZjΫ%є1sBObpx-~@^_ 6
endstream
endobj
38 0 obj
<>stream
H| XTG^7)xx"*I$M61CTPTh"(O/oG1NJq=_WU PR