%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:15:57-04:00
2021-07-02T14:15:57-04:00
2021-07-02T14:15:57-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-04826.a1
uuid:24ff2749-73a3-475a-8c10-2be4ea4336f7
uuid:a3d9a048-c559-4424-843d-a681cdcc24d0
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
[33 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-04826.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-04826.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:15:57 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 15, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-04826)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Wilford H. Ross issued a decision, dated January 25\
, 2002, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to )Tj
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Applicant appealed. )Tj
8.247 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.762 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge's )Tj
27.924 0 Td
(decision.)Tj
-27.924 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred when making certain)Tj
T*
(findings about the physical nature of )Tj
14.885 0 Td
(Applicant's foreign country \(hereinafter designated FC\) passport; \(2\)\
whether the)Tj
-14.885 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge erred by finding that Applicant had not surrendered\
his )Tj
31.076 0 Td
(FC passport; and \(3\) whether the)Tj
-31.076 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge erred by concluding the government's security conce\
rns regarding Applicant's susceptibility to)Tj
T*
(foreign )Tj
(influence were not mitigated.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued a Statement of Reasons\
\(SOR\) dated August 16, 2001 to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline C )Tj
14.692 0 Td
(\(Foreign Preference\), Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), and Guideline\
E \(Personal)Tj
-14.692 -1.375 Td
(Conduct\).)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 63.6602 197.25 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 63.6602 196.5 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 77.4663 192.75 Tm
( )Tj
(Applicant declined a hearing and elected to have the case )Tj
23.406 0 Td
(decided on the basis of the administrative record.)Tj
-28.528 -1.125 Td
(The government issued a File of Relevant Material \(FORM\) containing th\
e documentary record against )Tj
41.655 0 Td
(Applicant on)Tj
-41.655 -1.125 Td
(October 3, 2001. )Tj
(The Applicant submitted a response to the FORM on November 2, 2001. )Tj
36.411 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
-36.411 -1.125 Td
(issued a written decision, )Tj
10.359 0 Td
(dated January 25, 2002, in which he concluded it is not consistent with \
the national interest to)Tj
-10.359 -1.125 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(The case is )Tj
4.692 0 Td
(before the Board on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's)Tj
-25.766 -1.125 Td
(adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
(#iiKxT$V)
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq- (]9e{V29'ۥl$hͲE62N"8jÎ9(-͋:8m85f?(x9Nv_v] tKg_ G١Q~;/sy9+\l'ufD&2Z5+QOIsL!7__d(#!.U-&*# ܪ>\i1ÀlTa_ Ƃ2
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xz`<]⁈x3$@^9DE%&***"h<\oD@Q[uvx<1Y¾}kf
@ն}U$>c? 8l^h]?4n@w1 Ml: |'
|4i
?Oطsh}Ϙ̵N;*"$ Dri\xb"9ÿm%qR Vç 6֮Ǐ