%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:15:14-04:00
2021-07-02T14:15:14-04:00
2021-07-02T14:15:14-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-03767.a1
uuid:8661618e-f512-472e-868e-1e5cb47a08bf
uuid:dfd77d7c-bc86-41e9-8068-63dddc1545de
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-03767.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-03767.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:15:14 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: December 5, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(---------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-03767)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
0.348 -2.2 Td
(Tobe M. Lev, Esq.)Tj
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued the Applicant\
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(January 17, 2003, which stated the reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.357 0 Td
(why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke Applicant's access to classified)Tj
-17.357 -1.125 Td
(information. )Tj
5.221 0 Td
(The SOR was based upon Guidelines H \(Drug Involvement\), E \(Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.55 0 Td
(Conduct\), and J \(Criminal)Tj
-34.771 -1.125 Td
(Conduct\). )Tj
(Administrative Judge Robert Robinson Gales issued an unfavorable securit\
y clearance decision, dated August)Tj
T*
(25, 2003.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction on appeal under)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(Executive Order 10865 and Department of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.327 0 Td
(Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amende\
d.)Tj
-17.327 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by concluding that the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(security concerns raised by Applicant's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.87 0 Td
(drug involvement had not been mitigated, and \(2\) whether the Administr\
ative)Tj
-15.87 -1.125 Td
(Judge erred by concluding that the security concerns raised by Applicant\
's)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.921 0 Td
(multiple falsifications throughout the security)Tj
-29.921 -1.125 Td
(clearance process had not been mitigated. )Tj
16.909 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.244 0 Td
(Judge's)Tj
-43.153 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
25.797 0 Td
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-25.797 -1.125 Td
(2-3)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(\(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with specifici\
ty\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(1\) arbitrary or capricious; or \(2\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.328 0 Td
(contrary to law. )Tj
6.553 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or conclusions are arbitrary or cap\
ricious,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.726 0 Td
(the Board will review the Judge's)Tj
-31.726 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant evidence; it\
fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
T*
(its)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found and\
the choice made; it does not consider)Tj
T*
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.879 0 Td
(judgment; it fails to consider an important aspect of the case; it offer\
s an)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(f؟c )
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\n <"ZJ(ҔRв=@
ND!o?U'
cmYY`4V{\Wg
QK8p83)s ~'=q荽WoW~pB#=2aB)lin)/gԬqqB?2Yh@h4/E;{LVrQ!n3deb2\]]}}:s9k%Z┙>/*1UGZd)[&1U먮S SRbՌ{g쀢d ƿ
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H| TTWרȦB5hL2I,E#*"h\pQQqEqAQq}qsAGgΜSn[y߹/@ h@Uխ[HXLh\溆 6!^-[h]7"fpwQ ͒ l:U55;*"43zQ|c3*&>!s|?stlX(13,? Ms^\ i<_=&4&Bh=\ qJ\x y^uq"6'x @@ (,|-~eA B Jb Cy:>j>S[kc 4VT5S6\8?>l+P[Qiנa#N.M5kޢJRkV^۴ػ]}:uҵ[w=? ջO~?0
"0|?!a!0<,<"rDQcƍ7> &M)S%NuFY礤M1E,\V\:ku7ds6nL[n۾c{+G+9~dgΞ+.^|*\a04kU[hUC[ȃi"MJ5tX#(B0O8.<^r~ԽݪZz.5ܥ~`[i4TQ"풊Az&jt
uR3L3CY*6Z'mmsҶІj#<dPv]d7);r('rP^#;\,:].DԍŶ[o뭛#^j[zZzYZk=5VkRB^<)&SN먌=:CPa0W/ 9Dת@R$4@
z!XJH%BR:RPgq $i2spiU8h9C{r=R=(!z>Yܞs ҅sUqW ?{{%jG_*>k͕dMM0 jjNUp_ ` p/f?sgcs[sYg?\5&מ%%T SvNi)GM&k17zF#*f}Ý%B!C>3l0l3362xAu.ĿEUr^.]fix^\0
+@/l/bgw;Lerr@Y`Þ݁:;.*J=-z?y{=
Tu3O` wL9CLVQ(SiʹtcAl0 %m,Y7uQx_8]K) k.;EJqH %6ȍr,ȭr.wȝr-Ƚr/ȃsɹ-;WyT yR<+ɟUsݹ\vn_7C)(/*뺚k蚺躺膺n覺ͪgOW@5`5D
Up5BTh5&vx5AP5QIj
WST5MMw溅n[ֺn~跺;]jڣ}j:C:c:Ne{Sc3f4<6I/+qCo[^|"I|H)JUC#$)bH4",|JK_Q:JO(#e(3eE J(;堜rSʛ'JR_T
Qa*BE)m?Iw}@SS1*N%$TR9*S/h