ݫ^VЧS/vYk#
2 }]z ?]ؗ4ЋKj2Y4R[o=}&
!Up,u tOzƨݙ$D.TE
tn(7QhTZuFX7jn#G G xN&u\ĎR>OK[tAy.gBK<2sݞ KCϡH.1֡j"GT9U[]ٮ
,:dVS-艄pq.DdAjpYCW5
ڰvX{W8سBA=K
S\-ΌAu#Ԡf;HrO},R@&\+Om< gw>_.rINBqN |!ub-Дz4j5UIF*t cj3JF5U?J:I]J
N%Twl>|yj3#`r`,rkQM 7Vf+k 2IJ_\Z|@j!=dsQV*zд>
twK/= ^/{^; h ^ \zTa
E;Ř,Lղ @̌Xj av(̋⃢C/aoOŜ[P|5nM[-aʺ`!V{h-y [@TȎ -A1$
Ů}A^*<=qs|ͲGBUbw
wTаK*T«bHnՊ1빌Q\D
\
hP+ FJ
ו?)[ӭ芇ğK}rvC}
!H&@Hab Mf;oCDs`N9o97},9X3S1^y̤؝2! ,ituFH@)'7
U~K>/#QwwRɞ.%|$ {dB ϸBo qC4 q hCq[0Ϝaޙ¼_m`k C7a!h feα2u0cBSHA,yerA*:T+yPnkyBy0;c2ES;q1H UX}ni_[)[
vTƵ\4?}Fɹsr_MPTi:4 \CSDN !BMpw3vv`Eg F:E٦$%ҹfa8{ګ;Z~k+[ƿumNk k{`zٜwZ41>0H$MYǹwcWZ;<7T=haݳi:/8YS
8tm[14? -F<.wދ h@ ]mFz`Tx,p QQP]#DiGP :QLҹt 7ZF NZCťY6НvȐȲ
iU%GW u%k%,
.,i! #J(^NĚn'Tfwcc5Z Pa&Ց 02uِRtCjqp'~ُ_?u~?ױ$a}d:q'
$^B HӫnХpA
Mq7v 4~ /Hx=]ZXlP j-q4u`:뵆(@H2%4N [GӖϚt30
I ʞU<`xR:s 0GHe)B/INF)1 h Ƒ V qN/_8t(Z@9ic5Ď0F]e1/Azur$`68h),lpYYv
ʳfb̥QMpٶ"ZpSd[cgOĚl|L{>w=p5/+3ʍ*TAM TLkU]B_m۪&b-0G4jtSmMUmJn8y ZQ
!us$W*B{*B˪,'8ö2 vB4jTHf+& U eq-зĭ(gw_ @s4<b& YcU&B9=^:Ċ*V&
&,ol8sN< #KfEsj61wm IfN]LDAϙkhƨ8I0-5
zI)Chu.wW9 _kݟ|Fۉ-Se 0 +~q?|T0<[1l ĹMfς 0.*g
_W)߹@0a[zvʩ7z vkYv QKk٭ ONFrmb&w%v!D62O"M`VKBN:FwB<O56>n /{ԥ}8jnc#< `Ov7.6N)!#
bXKIZH'x7yFQۉa9^H\ M'bh%ޙ}N^ Aۇk&&; J|X! V?N]JwnlM" }:E]%CUSLJU$ x8쬇졝)>
? >rk+o 27%MaR"PgkSlqKd&bɶXT,qo QI)ݵ u CM4DNrATDHkbutүL93ܩIӉAj3k5\dyO{EV"Q⽷pIig/J_oܿlwoig8QnOl=rվ;W_B$)$qm$$Pd6zhc\p2l7Xt)Z
CxHcB#ODЁ18=VM;~P}#̵̥ܭt&Va1Aw
2# AфLA VZ V8 UƠ !̧o6qy_s/Gq8 /cNI SD=%>=V pj+MEhnXtVz< 4s(wj#F9pp~LM Z=\ SsĊ3Z1`4d E HQs U̴GQ\4ܞpU4ٸp3B%'8TBâi҄6L7MI 2Hr$ $A'AQjaiY ƍ5J- ȱ%8ɵ| [dϯ zc=ފ?yM'cmOa Z9He>~q_I !!Fz1 KW>N26 .wF-Qfp`88 5=mw;ƴqxAm[VEY1`2),Eː`.̶,kYe*J!B${=^ߚB_g,dEJ*PGg2Q-{쫹Rh;nwb/!, &U[`^CA)OރjwYv͚bf5)p$DS.3>@Alu^rN9O8o89$ ;< 2tҧX.-U !=GAKPgqj5mHq=2 D3f6d!٩?G_"j 3e5Ƿ$b:[挵,ִxwؓHF)DGc-3zNtQX} @
w{q u/;DZ}}?r?þ3K@$EZ@*taMG`A)(UN+
& (hRh&UbH[5*hIC@c9w)~E lA8:҉<)Xu$8D1hV# rs9L \NkL (r;rgsT*i
Fy{i~1D>|P:"
9'knsДPR ] jr|zow=emt4:0z;g?9) l Ӂ+1e
¬|9
w ڊvIrb&EA,/M([T2Dd&:v*`XQ`-p e[|]٥vV#9A0M0,5F_t c#Ơ+36!̺EsB5#GuwVv t=e5A >9|/""d:["-R+N2kV#HPT% =R Ș Y8
uvAmn
y`u Ӵ =FI}6bh mjwAҝ9o3&7`~PwV)+nm[-m0 Rcc|ؾtjPZCv6q}ĉq3_@
*i4]Ye"SS+]'VˀMhZ7Eb6iM6oLjg jܽ]|yp.( G\үojnv`8xiFhO$<ӌtngY#W>{/zDNzOv]$(L ݄#
wx+'H Ow'ӇCPP\1z,^)O"7 |֎t1aJ|*BQB5EP
]Q노PQ+Q\zSqi,
!#
Y z0 {eL"3fyWgX:f&csrl)FcUK)FvHú>9&"l[afЫ9o
W% ls,ht
LD8:۩ r6F R߾1K`|e?kL@x64Oϴ907 ::?Yh\G/'\Q2Lm_}Z
A[KN^o Nvm3{vARC1SjHQ(G*F1;cd/ *qe/sK 9anQcĆ/1n&Cs
.`JYN"TD1b6Rjl i x`o907 zc*;%QaJ
H2=o=%#JH"^
A iѯpWE;?t^>Ro b_?'pd|,+I}Ηaw!bi.oک j!k/7gv9^}ffB}Td+ޮq6ո; 6o pGѧ`4ѣ@` x={|܈oePW> P]?f "4g ̡5ugN3t{Zp[_o?{-76w(sx_|.gO@
CE t)! 7p$F-˗+6ɯ砑@HoL0`(rv2>7:
{ov;nn?= ʨ @콩}$HxV:KjX]?wgww$v؎CI %#%P7v2 ZNdcT%cRWI#
6WmcDQ&D6?F44UB)0߽w~}~qu$>;×' ڡ!sn&̓9dZBaDiSF-YeZ}]u֬̚5g-XUs[^l$?Kݮeanjԃ{=='dڃ$*9$zv-W'jqm {lmAHPShl)t.} 17G"^2/2-?+bAX8ގPh!JH]NEbjʿw
.{eQ"w%Kbhj_#dʈ*e\[+bfr)}+dĮѿ0>5]Wn/ Ucu, H'w6LR׃'p^R[m>?kNx(fK&x22EQt< vQ7`h8( 4 c
[M2͌'gLgIJ@7ݚ !Zȼxc4s:S;3Phғۜĭ7 DYv}M2YHrL"||5lbN @.5㢯^p> wEaۑٮES8(r[ M/igM 03ͭ4n:;UH \70E#⭍' bC,.&LtLL1ͷ|l(b <8?X|*G-8
@#jg] ў7>{^dV^ݟ/4 2O Ƶ?woy;w~+XD~ C~hz U$ 3aCPp610UU+TB8Boфq68Jpq<r
u4|>F 3S~d(:$Ǜ$*OCz
ud #rǔ"4q
{?uKX-]-٠] |<$gf'`sҴPM>P@50C`1CYetVΞV1J'ʠʺ[B@=k UoQK0/ D=N)a{]8yM9)?q {o(>@
Xݘ Ȼ@@?I8^$@>6rRot+UɍpcQ 鄫$&]rs{.8K0"+Hn 6m?j1t:UՆ}~Kwz opdA&-K o\`k}a7"nEE<,yEEX8)ΉxJ hOZl}2dE6e~A2{)wF:</0FQ|PH%G@@hu6 g h \8Q1;98
aDiNg5fI%P.
VZʽrUZkٲՕ@6`*8e|\A[Q찮UfwUv.>,)|B55eR
@ Fx~vx©vϭK + VԷAz_qX!fzmJ$Vdr5xGwl&1`"( T$TJ nu}|jKÑ
PU %04SâB
8&S+t
Mk[.+wX9(r:>_h8[Hh4l>^<9,U_ص۾cJGڬo|˟aH7b
z
w5+yVvp{sIh 2 UcbȪ\='v<=c;L2L8ة[O4[9&]ҦԤ
ەJq-->@]hDB
[([P"-G[Q\>XAzR_N YSS>PX=0EX+ޒR?B4#e`
2ܥ 2` T%2'H& a
sV9 ~saSFDHjj-ŦDؕy2{sc]Q:c y-'q`z5Nfݸ9މ#q S4LtfFf \r&̼dR
㱅095̋C%L2Y4! 4019 3wY_ $ "9J? @fO~ }!|
붡
{Ffmh#6xXgdKLHhX \}MJ\ZX H
3?{1 -bMKHu *3i%t]3Xp_ufTs?,ga]r?|?_}t;c=d_܋/ `j앛_7r4ðp@pG*+|Ѽ-[ͬt EzO, _;u7GNj)#i 2qs j٬sݕ30=4͋*^ATA[ F#*L,Ia:5k$:v$ #E%]/I Axc \s3Y&7[<:jGRaᰰՀKsEWrrVn92[Uel2=Dw'R6Nc7Owg& 2tnD^e
~HSikuZƏVBN>e g ld25ji_~jg@OtE;泗 >W;]ŰƢQ2N@DU|{GBo '+1- _7ȩ p*"ƽ""ځ({&`ܾNq{
·{wbSefeHe@G8ʱ* p== p%f p/^%ZaLgwȪeb;A㎎}~uLhý mEq <#:)b)K0 qpKCfp9 p^] _C֮ $Dt ьS)n]:'Ŋ
A[<&Ǻn;
pX
i8qXή5/6ȗB_+2 !
ZmmF"5d$[2+8Dn>18@ҧIЏ>0#,m#qq7ę38dv II(mAE&hmy@+!TBhC6
QxR VBB*d+. m
X;g{=s~uWwݪ}
>9\nE%ߍu
DEK
Шe,&Z&i!Df ǺҢ"jX.0m # \|MG.\YøfYdE@+!
\r6wag5Gt7kW?2 ~u h~
%S*r)K?p Tz#w
9E}V@?++*kE%
a 7E|b OZQi['w@Y;.` 3n'
e;7 =Qr"\6A|7^7GHz*IR UcצbBށ;{?1 f R_m%Ԛl?h6sV>y(&Z}w٠J>cڼ٘ TJ /zv^ВQ/)Qg[Y ! q
#a6c]x8B J
s +~8$6."m C8@SX;>"P2Lt1
3F
`%{d sCd)Ct5cxhx $$ ̸s|z`1o 3NkE(L\;2q_:JT]HOXPS;&8?E{e} B
r4-:I̴/x%?f%r4#srىptTcܿ+31!{~ 2/ߒɣ[44zZ j|*s6Ψ(q8j2Wqr
P_vU;9Y ʸLզ6M j vT WąkЂHE\YWi
+Gwɵ6\p%?u,= ߽e[8&[g'=E\><<Jc^ A2MtS{l 6S-c?,$P_9bA(5> B*tUKaaYa>!G7[( "7`g[`|FwvHiO[ 2
=} ->-# GwH8 i}@f'OtY1]52h}pCL|nzsd%})YO* .PsQ
-. r@uy|.l
_UK%r;e]DkMJ!ة\*\*kKTjkZMjjMA_
铵c+_o'$n1TK` a!PHRH: ))CVQ$b[F{NZLԩKa
RiԾp4X˱\.Dj{s ':82N&d<(j!cWXV Wxuo\$
'W
85
CDaP"g|/,R aK.2^hYZQ4?$ĊӒl7sڴ-
T2A8Lz Y +L+,o;1#5fMX5k[ ema/pALXc$ V_k~cX\
R~%pl:DP ԩ ojS@_^Vx*7L*
,{ "=Rɯ(с~Áq#,7WNnq)K7`WUn݁G6 ߭GR)3 DǞ<]P]ܮʤac\RqyMm6
GՆO,;0!~W#ۅTPeѠG&)do!j aɖq=?B?:G.wΠ\{?/z/z^GB >?1wxYC;β,8pW PgS(ʁ쮁\h}t{ߦ}OyW ;mܹg~αM=N }ESgMHZâ9"r5Q D)$FH"BIz"Li MhPKZx:ErB@/d6dD8QjtJ5VBt-R{_\E̬ؽVG
]Ë#hUYN2)`1n LB\ZT`j /٘Sb7({}&=дIߓMGM W}[pHx'tVZ ]lc $LRfbԨ-2l܅Jh )Hv]1qFAN0 z&Oˉ؆wVڭ2٩2nXSHQ^XF_/;3L[
ZW-E
;95JM}\עYxeʸDUEje !l[[pk$#~cWW`аlHl{q{&x+*FtIMIN] xx3֚bS?3+x:m|CKQ~90ҦHӕ'7 |_'w*~-~Ma_͐̈́%!^Cy$^ʇ5F"&$l0.qΫiFn^rAP^%DBVp$rX3zUAͤU0svg̶mz{PvT'1n{m('>, P$Nʓ6Ϩ?_Q/^߁|l߶?sF싁/K j$KFdi)^Mgc%q9)t]R:EAsA~
t+.BBC1!φzzIۓS;wQ,0=w1 (l d *C:4*=|XNB GX/)E¸E!|yܿXl 8i!h)3cB]!
W l(|<3qG1s?>oHewt}|?҆ѐۊ~ﯖ:A 5 fs$9=3N|D y#bk& ZiHALNf$"Q
LA9m2fW< tenK -5Heೇ].7P8X) b x#A O0x&>9֞U9Mס iwrh8E}94McSF3P; 2bre0 C统C=r/뺁fY ٘7JƲQgY~Nݘ"$ڳZOB,^+Q"f=BCLڂ]VPؾnr:kw _3 6Fź"
1s ~dvm
ZV 2A1Sa'~Wf"82{{ w_w;g.1kE
$$Da)9EM%jE HHAH458ܺE)hB+
AwΉfٙٙg4,/Ff5Qv/ `zib9[=]6R
/ bY< CJ{a9V6@.Z yVCyR[kI*l*}_`1r9PtٌGhdRzzƹސ]"!l"; dG\V`y;G p=Lf؝?OOf L&G 8VB ~4U_pM2TxL%Hy7Mq 'GsXF"CW&yLmQ;;lNA5*
RUu(Up
܀ R-cVD &m` BvB;G읝;m} }鼓 5b>Ѩ T>
_RgZ@Q %?fNUk=Y xvkE: *Ȭ 'd+))ILRbɩ$UD`#-5 ŜB$FA\xq2B,ɁFe`ch(1\9C!)tѽGNuZ QՅ I%{䍙0X(6?'<`Y,76χXc(6$f֭j /~]-2pK` ĴBi&
(>Ds7꧄g
;PfC1#ff.!jN
=aD!c <jh-t:?m6Xr ;k~G5xw VL 8ͶFrP:JMiz=jr Aݳ~ \μc' ן3auNkz,QTAIa놱bp&Djx|֛|)>o[k 55(1TAgg{mI-ɀaI0,8n9=`]7tCo
+m wp6Y[4T
qNhZHT>[0kEأuU={HWzYe9t
ZqHM!`1 h(=`9+vʶm=+(J1W!v z]w)tEm:jBOqգI̓y'ڢh?'у
o7-!f( 818sJO'iibd,EmQUiAƸgyr^ z`J5 HJJZBV]E WE
k<ϺUK,rL2Se'#,bYZJ:"+)YV,Ja 6] AqER,J(@1! gyiſpӅVHYY7暓
ු)>n
t*Hm`tD]]}^`ήsF
+Ǘ{fnj^f(Br0U\몵iݲ뛍 `ZnC6O 얷`hXPR/ןnbw8"` ?ov2 j*:IE4ZD)8ҡh4@\TaT4.~
'Q3Ơ`9s@>}<,[Ff_?[ fgy ޝ (ݿ_-LH%RIw?ꕒj@b/=k`x;FC( X=Z:/wP I*jfRiӫDypr_Rl)$. ۑ Nl" .Qɏ^/}錌 "ģq)D ?&1s92'eיKxExX (ԋ(oIqOqgz}R0|ޑ3vs f.@[JMC ,e2F#h
(ziwR)b 8-**V˕JTEmԲ$.Ì0L]-1v4nGae.*
M5uF;L7OZ/N y/4m:!`DvDP 5 _))X\USBtFڈ^dq{#rxJ]vퟃ;d6M@.kwP;XzԨi2*][R
,'٦|l[^}40B.]h1,O,
[gA3h从"Jމ@tsCi.17G2 nRn"gdz5NmD
Vò0ӂ 1o^E1gH~}{9^Er!#Bi's%]LNzn2شc f ;YƱ\JiWաп_C7_}
(/띐 PջYB1 )
VΪ6OFcPSFF)dtۢAA{Qjr
\dpذ{GGf9M6Ϟl4ޯ3W?Kr ⷲ@N vHZM%i
Q6j8U8QP]th>p:9pѵ
l JQ̉^S̀ fkN.w P!%^iN4Ty^CHuڟY[z3_ =@ʣ{( O`i%Gӌ^Ɏy N
jUլ^ýs^AQ]Ww/vy
, ,|
Ea A (QQ3(1VU&$jԦv8uhc5?Mi;
jR[[|hAg߹P3ma~{λ;ʜ[\ZXXSmmOEvv~O2OљIWlyÑ"_~D*ϐGN #ĕpX>@%R\d G^)R&EI~F*//]JWK:;[¹݁H
5r##Gy5Ej#j$P9g|S>yx,⃐1 aׄ&+q/;pv^ Yݎ ~: `TM\YO JW cܰR*Jw^|z`ȕ=+F0WYCʝ"3ɃEz0ކ /EJ*ӌe [K^7gbd`|r +9tCt$ukoL REO k 6.jg {E CMsti]YUm3vCi56QvAYp1D1'zfSR $-0"&TP~Ϣ-y[
(WTqJdԚXD( XZRy<Q 4TE
_'ƁMo4G|bld3Kwm7]~̈́*Ly&DVј (FӢFydZT+Jaɔc'}Q-=OOB5z ,$wjֻWOwT+ιx Ṟ)T%XU$; ѩc3"J9~o$_*f}6N[ԛ$/gί>}
G>h= {pxn?{W25B':ڡNjEiRx(߫=O!߀{( "B & |hB_?1,=b_Aɫ7S.0zvJߘRdQ \۳y.WkF k{( Ƣ<6CZП A 9AE| LUc@
ԣm ظ
)V-@fr[Y,)zMc"J>Mɼn^&mz f}#OmUkPGqQ){R8dހgKz ec}W,S~ %xWi¶}*Q'ʼ>MYzTۗ1|[(l
e@1 р9~Acx]i BP ?_ ?p3爟y% Pa!q>,H,nq>v<Üan2?,f
s,3?WWӋ@
Lm9 <6s9cI$xɜ![ sk,f1b1g{mIiC=#%-{?@u4ݒ^ CB\CM%=)؟k?~u ,w_%3}ʷ1^@WSs>E.8,}
'^ǒ1-ջh5>G#Rʁ K8 P+ nb7F-Fc4EZ-U]1vgGBb1 u$чs\YzC
h4%)-Gx,)}*j]UԼ(}2j%MYya^
F?h^}8e|l$ [Gԭvq PD A yscض-bقu킼adžsj*,ʥOz/Σ!g!Χ<:VO(]!c[} qyyGZ%#M\9(U1w6_^-a0buu4}Hm i'ǂ|㬬goC PF)q|?>Ⱦ[W0=L>MpMH r?GE"7%g
٧ҼQ ɘ?$jjG
fWQr@gHB*Fl@~e`ƿeҼ-22Z"\gl[12<ԭ ^݁ih ύ T/B1A G9~{"W/RAj5W?fju.s:U wgcR>\ ݯ ͠UU
z1a3v7i== \;-ˁ:֩im2rrub|FL0ݥDg6cul}v`\m4 CM <7 eUU߽sgAa^#B!8(&$H\,P#"uhJt QGG%)Up33gaYُz $9^ǥ8YSHT
Ļ7b
*()g,uw*q
7+#@pl_/onPw!,>٫7K3sd'| ~y|8x|wY:~+@y
7n'֏":d9]ӏ8n
iTIdOҨ[ycE\FY>u,e ڇ3N*h[ӿ*b? ĠؼyVGuISCؙll&tŒBmg;?J {zѨej09[ȩi郭 /pZȫbzVaa 5-9CۯD,ޑ<ۺȡ-߈o+ʬe-< C}{n|v 3wuȶ
1^P=R zDmZwp ;vavw
]Yw(`8xlM}$wCooB ளSFLBBVN6픫 bkEN;OSX&(VL%KW"9:?myGiQ
JRv]ҹ-'uG ]I:ÎO-' [)@ݴ=2ܷύ>dL /u07ȭ="z/ ?w@Bvi2P@W]
q,}&ӦgMVśRKpt(FHt6)QrlLklj.cy%D{UFۇq&/ L2~F3&0g'H69ɛG_ޟZ-'}zc,.&DԈqPVm' =m2yUs
ܜisX9 ?
JO/eD.V3?{I w\ :h5\gy.<_2!LN\99뻝/n,N&:֬.ܯ{iV~ZNl"9&ke}w܋/-mE}TJx
4Ɨ446Ӳ61Ma vx'M;3:e/3yS`ݧsjz^h*t)~]NǴ
JSv3'7 >O7_UԿ]!`h1k2 2J-l?QnI5;~%B od/DTkRxM p څyagYQ|z/b~oQ9- }%^mM[_zSP? X$=~{ou;oZuÏb<$ C:$ԟx{鿱Bے]r{"\`˯v_e ҆;o綑F}8kV+枈61M_D/3cհڶYo [!jV6BX`&dv`' E{ ^m _.zLn?\!*r _,p5]E-"V,lʐL̼x_9{`;ÔwMm 6pakLN%ޖ~r4+;_da26?.Rr><(RY}->-MɼM}Zs 'gKw7A$NO-]+3gˏmVA@7R sk_hL/@şMIKz;8-2d3d4ϧcT -_5:vqFmglo2k+MWEk9˟Nؼ.lu,w:[NNl'c[W
,Vيv5y ^r^gSYX}߁L 1;Q1 cKh٭CEx1k_ =X#}0lC ,e \ 7n ݼv{?:~u9Rݙq8U
{0a,zYgއgC.-{`̾rr gh$"yv,cަ5xxUَu s?R^JvWX0XcK3^oVmo=|%ENL%o!F FVX 15qѦɌw-kv-CQ}m2d2el`8sQi TjPB҂%Rbu>d%W@݂a`B !d:l
*H\&P s[_uK&VtP}؏T5?kX__}zT9? c:8 Icqi!WRs4|~E}6%N vecGd-?3F_>6Ea{.!&aVbp)\HbҘO3GY~Ě
ٓY=i%X k{҄i>YI):M5/r.lk)]H멵q{O |Wg;q}H곣L&q6Tݠ~i^*yGL-"^nƝ3 y.ej^ 6{L^~Q7 nJW.Cf +}!C'5NCF8ߓ
})4J`Jl|+ " e; ry?+o!grD<ÿJzʣ3ӱve_i;{a l:zwod_^3>}Ww f̍܍-UhRϜd0KE~m3ͳyߢ}ʏHkaNv>iDTj.y}`:)v/a_ ߀7dj^v^ճFUǧik0'kӻ7^m4k_ A~Uo?IejlNs8lƞ4C+~=Խ|^htzW7M4؋FqhxO'ߨ&P/G +ޔK:yb(Ys%/k| !x$W3>HʷV1O|>}zF>^))}R"B85 b" PQvSdCteX7ƴgPF#+`lJu/Hׄ&m_!ϞmZA1V֤uhPr(Ĺ1HUqur7Q;/YC1eX̋36|矔6s< >7ڽ rv^x 2b{6] NaD(vZ#b ~_klTwh 4@y? 6`Ѯw¾ƱKX$ HڪQI/!jB]Eڲ&!R[U[3gf̜;s̐mRL*ﳭd9wueJ68Oa <{](.;Pҵ9W `;y|0c+e?cl`0Z];sma> YGƻqyo>Oݛ*`۟Ũ fʹuq֡zm|6vwh |Αw*8l$8 x Wsl/},q[s{'_➙NI1$r)܇f%j]r)CQoP R|w'GyNbǰV<
wi(t0;,+>+u?x7.[lTh{ 猎㜒^Пmww)x NI *Lso
: -u)Kƿ柰V(}V* ih?1 Ii9`ۗNE7R%,;:/ؖ>z '8voV&y1O8v; /z?𭓵 'ZrPണ=q6nޝʱu{\]/2k ~DZ&{
b SuX^I
dz|+kQwRܗ J):63pmio< Uh0*V $cd<3ǽﷅVL5gqOa>Dl?\86Şh` C1˴cnIH\H26 'k73 63NC?yd[,=>rr=FyLݤ"D\hv~GqV^2ko#ςsM꺙u%>ͱ_w TF{?x GB9`Fc+cU5iP歷sf[vs`"zRn_p4c$=7Pfd 17ظKX} m.9ۯp%J&ߜwU1w2^1yM<`#y :`UGeLg%`VYa)HKrBi6 H}?[Oы2P?,F;ہk@ }1KUO>4} u= ʡ; ^^e5Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4Fh4F'6~
+3`GV 09~y ?(nl*[ٌl`BFvP>edYȢ26T;Wed;lP'#;(/ddǕ5XBɋnXLE$ч42,}U*#v} ZU3uRkzJ}C;vre~QKiDn *|c]~}GcW:溩= cbbNA5=ӥ|!|'K֧<9D33 |e{64=PԏG $T"ʷU{Kհf+2#+>A_lb'!˓ E-RXؐK놕'S{" gKͷODžfv[-&bhcѸ/FD}($:; a%n+P%rsθ+6ƬWiE{" 4m4_]+dIbݢG]펈@B&DN;]Ѹhv~_Hdzd(;hOo1JHyxEkoEr,a;@
PZ+V U + Uښ{+`vDþH6BP#J'q_
D/
}FkֳFTqbϋӢ YӫV}G R3/ ' Y!_L03(7:g6Ɔu%o0FH (R QN3uƸ4fgiU* MY0 [%+r*.N-U%#
ᑥiah"lc1b\tUT،ȷPƯ:c cme 6D
ASCy ':gS.A _gA5@>bQjIKl$Jm:\qnl@C8JH NlXBP-%, ӺPLC]G4ma%G"D@|hD 1oBZk1Z6Ns
&
:ە پz>rVlofOZBq!B~ϸD?lENz9Z+o 1Z~m%],cs8b&' .KEAMF^
8jӈ @Ƥ^@ Z>6hyEԋQgǙG} -F\ G@+ZZZ\/1C t L ?\]>
2Oz LW VU4"z3*))9vmfۭ6Gmm5f gzЏэ,fO Z et"@;
㒸g< G"|-ϰw Kϧ ;w4+xAIG}# ]y@H@vṻK 0 8X.,ljksd %\O)IyH>.9",n jl~ԪƁRw* 0=QrTkjUQ
=KDSKVӿJ*9l/Y@{/
h
~q[hJd`zZrUk.5r-sI䕒/{c^N?OPۨYHm#
ml6Ae'
]qGӿhg@AAACЏl5Ϡ }!M/vU U߶w=iC~f@N!1 .H"}$+~# nua+&
diAu!q[\At9rIbꕓHP_(]OX87h3WvV8KCWY B?sd ^^}.S:8F
?wwCh
1
r+މt*3|s(K6
3 {|=벴%3TdT0 *1|7^S' 1agsssY;W8;K]%.U*t\R\U}`V܇O>E0H<RpXϰlVI$v4YՉvk]uru|79GOShYʏHcVIs*[BGJф5G~A'VR*ЛȒÑHɦE7ǞBy~)lEu:љ^)eqtw'*x2($J_Qŷ8}%zl#Ae6b
ҌI`<6 Lau4ˍUClJR!ǪPV
.`ޯVDW-"r4
\cPL =k1> q TD"O eYRCe]U:7r 9S
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 3/Type/Page>>
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-06266.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-06266.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:16:45 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 381 591.75 384.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(Guideline L support her expressed doubts )Tj
16.941 0 Td
(about Applicant's security eligibility, and the Judge properly resolved \
those)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741 Tm
(doubts in favor of the national security. )Tj
15.996 0 Td
(Accordingly, the Board affirms the Judge's )Tj
17.426 0 Td
(adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
-33.422 -2.125 Td
(Signed: Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 16 714.75 cm
0 0 m
113.32 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 690 Tm
(Emilio Jaksetic)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Chairman, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 612.75 cm
0 0 m
134.795 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 588 Tm
(Michael Y. Ra'anan)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(Signed: Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
ET
q 1 0 0 1 16 510.75 cm
0 0 m
120.645 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 16 486 Tm
(Jeffrey D. Billett)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge)Tj
T*
(Member, Appeal Board)Tj
T*
(1. )Tj
(Missile launch detection technology is no more "missile technology" than\
radar \(a form of aircraft detection)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(technology\) is "aircraft technology.")Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 2/Type/Page>>
endobj
45 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-06266.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-06266.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:16:45 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 755.25 Tm
(Applicant persuades the Board that footnote six of the decision below re\
flects a )Tj
32.018 0 Td
(reasonable interpretation of the record)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741.75 Tm
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal argument on this point relies on factual assertions t\
hat constitute new evidence, which the)Tj
-4.053 -1.125 Td
(Board cannot consider on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(2. )Tj
(Whether the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearance decision i\
s arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 702 cm
0 0 m
545.953 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 573.9531 702.75 Tm
(.)Tj
-46.496 -1.125 Td
(Applicant also argues: \(a\) he has a longer )Tj
16.827 0 Td
(history of holding security clearance without any security violations; \(\
b\) no)Tj
-16.827 -1.125 Td
(adverse information has been uncovered during any background investigati\
on of )Tj
32.435 0 Td
(him; \(c\) his business contacts with Mr.)Tj
-32.435 -1.125 Td
(X have not involved classified information or technology, and pose no se\
curity risks; \(d\) he has not personally met with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(r. X for several years, and has not traveled to Mr. X's home country sin\
ce 1993; and \(e\) he is willing to cease his)Tj
T*
(minimal communications with Mr. X "if it )Tj
17.24 0 Td
(really will serve a purpose." )Tj
11.46 0 Td
(The Board construes these arguments as raising)Tj
-28.7 -1.125 Td
(the issue of whether the Administrative Judge's adverse security clearan\
ce )Tj
29.892 0 Td
(decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary)Tj
-29.892 -1.125 Td
(to law.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(a\) The absence of security violations by Applicant does not have the \
significance that he places on it. )Tj
41.014 0 Td
(The federal)Tj
-41.014 -1.125 Td
(government is not required to wait until an )Tj
17.33 0 Td
(applicant has mishandled or failed to safeguard classified information b\
efore)Tj
-17.33 -1.125 Td
(it can deny or revoke the applicant's access to such information. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
25.783 0 Td
(Adams v. Laird)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
(420 F.2d 230, 238-239 \(D.C. Cir.)Tj
-25.783 -1.125 Td
(1969\), )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(cert. denied)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
7.553 0 Td
(, 397 U.S. 1039 \(1970\). )Tj
(Even if an applicant has never engaged in a security violation, the)Tj
-7.553 -1.125 Td
(government )Tj
5.026 0 Td
(still can consider whether the facts and circumstances of the applicant'\
s case raises security concerns.)Tj
-5.026 -2.125 Td
(\(b\) Applicant's argument that no adverse information was uncovered dur\
ing any background investigation goes beyond)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(the record evidence before the )Tj
12.354 0 Td
(Administrative Judge. )Tj
9.082 0 Td
(No evidence concerning the background investigations of)Tj
-21.436 -1.125 Td
(Applicant was presented for the consideration of the Judge during the )Tj
28.075 0 Td
(proceedings below. )Tj
8.025 0 Td
(And, even if the Board were)Tj
-36.101 -1.125 Td
(to assume -- solely for purposes of addressing this argument -- that App\
licant's assertion is correct, such an )Tj
43.031 0 Td
(assumption)Tj
-43.031 -1.125 Td
(would not lead the Board to conclude the Judge erred. )Tj
21.854 0 Td
(Favorable statements about an applicant made by persons during)Tj
-21.854 -1.125 Td
(a background investigation )Tj
11.081 0 Td
(are not dispositive of an applicant's security eligibility. )Tj
22.147 0 Td
(The government is not precluded)Tj
-33.228 -1.125 Td
(from considering the security significance of other information )Tj
25.437 0 Td
(developed during an applicant's background)Tj
-25.437 -1.125 Td
(investigation just because persons interviewed during the background inv\
estigation did not make adverse )Tj
42.295 0 Td
(statements)Tj
-42.295 -1.125 Td
(about the applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(c\) The SOR did not allege that Applicant discussed or otherwise discl\
osed classified information or technology with)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Mr. X. )Tj
(Nor did Department Counsel seek )Tj
16.802 0 Td
(to prove that Applicant discussed or otherwise disclosed classified)Tj
-16.802 -1.125 Td
(information or technology with Mr. X. )Tj
15.72 0 Td
(And, as discussed earlier in this decision, the absence )Tj
21.633 0 Td
(of security violations does)Tj
-37.353 -1.125 Td
(not have the significance Applicant places on it. )Tj
19.466 0 Td
(The Judge's decision is not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law)Tj
-19.466 -1.125 Td
(because there is )Tj
6.58 0 Td
(no evidence that Applicant's contacts with Mr. X involved the discussion\
of classified information.)Tj
-6.58 -2.125 Td
(\(d\) The absence of personal meetings between Applicant and Mr. X in re\
cent years does not detract from the)Tj
T*
(Administrative Judge's findings and conclusions )Tj
19.595 0 Td
(about Applicant's communications with Mr. X. )Tj
19.066 0 Td
(Similarly, the fact that)Tj
-38.661 -1.125 Td
(Applicant has not traveled to Mr. X's home country does not detract from\
the Judge's )Tj
34.241 0 Td
(findings and conclusions about)Tj
-34.241 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's communications with Mr. X. )Tj
16.595 0 Td
(The security concerns discussed by the Judge do not turn on whether Appl\
icant)Tj
-16.595 -1.125 Td
(has )Tj
(discussions with Mr. X on a face-to-face or a long-distance basis, or on\
whether Applicant has traveled recently to)Tj
T*
(Mr. X's home country.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(e\) Applicant's offer to stop his communications with Mr. X does not d\
emonstrate the Administrative Judge erred. )Tj
45.865 0 Td
(Given)Tj
-45.865 -1.125 Td
(the clearly consistent with the )Tj
12.191 0 Td
(national interest standard, a demonstrated track record of reform, rehab\
ilitation, or)Tj
-12.191 -1.125 Td
(changed circumstances is needed to extenuate or mitigate security concer\
ns )Tj
30.432 0 Td
(raised by an applicant's conduct or situation.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-30.432 -1.125 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.15. )Tj
24.992 0 Td
(A promise or offer to take action in the future does )Tj
20.577 0 Td
(not)Tj
-45.568 -1.125 Td
(constitute evidence of reform, rehabilitation, or changed circumstances.\
)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
21.767 -2.125 Td
(Conclusion)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.767 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge made findings of fact that, for the most part, \
are: \(i\) challenged on appeal based on new)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evidence, or \(ii\) not challenged by Applicant )Tj
18.16 0 Td
(on appeal. )Tj
4.359 0 Td
(With one exception that constitutes harmless error, Applicant)Tj
-22.52 -1.125 Td
(has failed to demonstrate the Judge's findings of fact are erroneous. )Tj
27.171 0 Td
(The Judge )Tj
(reached conclusions under Guideline B)Tj
-27.171 -1.125 Td
(and Guideline L that reflect a reasonable interpretation of the record e\
vidence, and Applicant has failed to demonstrate)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(the Judge's conclusions are arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
27.254 0 Td
(The Judge's conclusions under Guideline B and)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 1/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj
[48 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-06266.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-06266.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:16:45 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 754.5 Tm
(Guidance, Item )Tj
6.414 0 Td
(E3.1.32.1. )Tj
(The Board must consider not only whether there is record evidence suppor\
ting a Judge's)Tj
ET
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 741 Tm
(findings, but also whether there is evidence that fairly )Tj
21.771 0 Td
(detracts from the weight of the evidence supporting those)Tj
-21.771 -1.125 Td
(findings. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 99-0205 \(October 19, 2000\) at p. 2.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When a challenge to an Administrative Judge's rulings or conclusions rai\
ses a question of law, the Board's scope of)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(review is plenary. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.386 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( DISCR Case No. )Tj
(87-2107 \(September 29, 1992\) at pp. 4-5 \(citing federal cases\).)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
13.839 -2.125 Td
(Appeal Issues)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-21.225 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge concluded that the facts and circumstances of A\
pplicant's business contacts with Mr. X, a)Tj
T*
(foreign businessman, raised security )Tj
14.802 0 Td
(concerns under Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\). )Tj
19.743 0 Td
(The Judge also concluded that the)Tj
-34.545 -1.125 Td
(facts and circumstances of Applicant's acting as a consultant with a for\
eign )Tj
30.281 0 Td
(company based overseas in Mr. X's home)Tj
-30.281 -1.125 Td
(country )Tj
(raised security concerns under Guideline L \(Outside Activities\). )Tj
29.158 0 Td
(The Judge entered formal findings against)Tj
-29.158 -1.125 Td
(Applicant with respect to SOR paragraph 1.a \(Guideline B\) and SOR para\
graph 2.a \(Guideline L\), but formal findings)Tj
T*
(for Applicant with respect to SOR )Tj
13.942 0 Td
(paragraphs 2.b and 2.c \(Guideline L\). )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(The Judge's formal findings with respect to)Tj
-29.187 -1.125 Td
(SOR paragraphs 2.b and 2.c are not at issue on appeal.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(1. )Tj
(Whether some of the Administrative Judge factual findings were erroneous\
)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 28 530.25 cm
0 0 m
360.885 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
12 0 0 12 388.8848 531 Tm
(. )Tj
(Applicant contends the Administrative)Tj
-31.074 -1.125 Td
(Judge misunderstood the record evidence )Tj
16.8 0 Td
(and made various erroneous findings of fact. )Tj
18.105 0 Td
(In support of this contention,)Tj
-34.906 -1.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal brief contains many statements that go beyond the rec\
ord )Tj
30.754 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(Those statements constitute new)Tj
-34.807 -1.125 Td
(evidence, which the Board cannot consider. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.716 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.29. )Tj
24.992 0 Td
(The )Tj
(Board)Tj
-42.708 -1.125 Td
(will not consider or address appeal arguments made by Applicant that rel\
y on new evidence.)Tj
T*
(Applicant does make some arguments that do not rely on new evidence. )Tj
29.02 0 Td
(Those arguments are the following: \(a\) the)Tj
-29.02 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge failed to consider the )Tj
17.496 0 Td
(record evidence that shows Applicant discussed with Mr. X, a foreign)Tj
-17.496 -1.125 Td
(businessman, unclassified technology relating to law enforcement and ant\
i-terrorism )Tj
34.045 0 Td
(efforts, not military or defense-)Tj
-34.045 -1.125 Td
(related technology; \(b\) the Judge erred by finding that Applicant disc\
ussed "missile technology" with Mr. X; and \(c\) the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge )Tj
(erred by finding that Applicant is on a retainer with a specific U.S. co\
mpany doing business with Mr. X.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(a\) The Board does not find persuasive Applicant's argument that the A\
dministrative Judge failed to consider record)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(evidence that shows Applicant's )Tj
13.066 0 Td
(discussions with Mr. X involved unclassified technology relating to law \
enforcement)Tj
-13.066 -1.125 Td
(and anti-terrorism efforts, not military or defense-related technology. \
)Tj
27.879 0 Td
(There is a rebuttable presumption that an)Tj
-27.879 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge considered all the record evidence unless the Judge\
specifically states otherwise. )Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
41.265 0 Td
(See, e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.332 0 Td
(, ISCR)Tj
-44.596 -1.125 Td
(Case No. 99-9020 \(June 4, 2001\) at p. 2. )Tj
(Apart from this rebuttable presumption, the Board's reading of the Judge\
's)Tj
T*
(decision persuades it that the Judge's )Tj
14.955 0 Td
(findings of fact reflect a reasonable interpretation of the record evide\
nce)Tj
-14.955 -1.125 Td
(concerning the nature of the technology that Applicant discussed with Mr\
. X. )Tj
31.159 0 Td
(The )Tj
(Judge did not find that Applicant)Tj
-31.159 -1.125 Td
(discussed classified technology with Mr. X; indeed, the Judge specifical\
ly found that Applicant discussed technology)Tj
T*
(with Mr. )Tj
(X that was unclassified and in the public domain \(Decision at pp. 4 and\
9\). )Tj
33.882 0 Td
(Furthermore, it was not arbitrary or)Tj
-33.882 -1.125 Td
(capricious for the Judge to conclude that )Tj
16.467 0 Td
("[w]hile these products were apparently intended for law enforcement)Tj
-16.467 -1.125 Td
(purposes, such devices could have defense uses" \(Decision at p. 9\). )Tj
27.123 0 Td
(The Judge's )Tj
(conclusion reflects a reasonable)Tj
-27.123 -1.125 Td
(interpretation of the record evidence. )Tj
15.048 0 Td
(In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes Applicant's claim of error\
lacks)Tj
-15.048 -1.125 Td
(merit.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(\(b\) Applicant also argues the Administrative Judge erred by finding he\
discussed missile technology with Mr. X. )Tj
45.352 0 Td
(The)Tj
-45.352 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge found Applicant )Tj
15.608 0 Td
(discussed with Mr. X unclassified missile launch detection technology \(\
Decision)Tj
-15.608 -1.125 Td
(at pp. 4 and 10\). )Tj
6.749 0 Td
(At one point in the decision, the Judge refers to that )Tj
20.939 0 Td
(discussion as one about "missile technology")Tj
-27.688 -1.125 Td
(\(Decision at p. 9\). )Tj
7.442 0 Td
(Considering the record evidence in this case, the Judge's reference to "\
missile technology" was)Tj
-7.442 -1.375 Td
(erroneous.)Tj
0 0 0.933 rg
9.75 0 0 9.75 66.3145 132 Tm
( \(1\))Tj
ET
0 0 0.933 RG
q 1 0 0 1 66.3145 131.25 cm
0 0 m
13.806 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 80.1206 127.5 Tm
( )Tj
(But that error was harmless in nature because: \(i\) other portions of t\
he Judge's decision show the Judge)Tj
-5.343 -1.125 Td
(understood that Applicant's discussions )Tj
16.012 0 Td
(with Mr. X pertained to missile launch detection technology, not missile\
)Tj
-16.012 -1.125 Td
(technology; and \(ii\) the Judge's single erroneous reference to missile\
technology does )Tj
34.448 0 Td
(not appear to have affected her)Tj
-34.448 -1.125 Td
(analysis of the case in a manner that was prejudicial to Applicant.)Tj
T*
(\(c\) Applicant takes exception to footnote six of the decision below, a\
nd asserts that he has never received any funds)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(from Mr. X, citing page 57 of the hearing )Tj
16.856 0 Td
(transcript in support of this argument. )Tj
15.358 0 Td
(A review of the transcript page cited by)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
48 0 obj
<>/BS<