%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:16:44-04:00
2021-07-02T14:16:44-04:00
2021-07-02T14:16:44-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-06166.a1
uuid:23de3125-e5f2-47f9-ae5c-322fa383258a
uuid:24d97757-761a-4d01-894e-8c615bface37
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-06166.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-06166.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:16:44 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: October 25, 2001)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-06166)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-5.359 -2.2 Td
(Kathryn A. Trowbridge, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
6.137 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John R. Erck issued a decision, dated July 18, 2001\
, in which he concluded it is clearly consistent)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(with the national interest to grant or continue a)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.967 0 Td
(security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
13.299 0 Td
(Department Counsel appealed. )Tj
12.551 0 Td
(For the)Tj
-44.817 -1.125 Td
(reasons set forth below, the Board reverses the Administrative Judge's d\
ecision.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as amended.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred by applying)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(certain Personal Conduct Mitigating Conditions; and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.386 0 Td
(\(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
-21.386 -1.125 Td
(clearance decision should be reversed.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated March 21, 2001.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline E \(Personal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.663 0 Td
(Conduct\) and Guideline H \(Drug Involvement\). )Tj
19.356 0 Td
(A hearing was held on)Tj
-38.02 -1.125 Td
(May 30, 2001.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a decision, dated July 18, 2001, in whic\
h he concluded it is clearly consistent with the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(national interest to grant or continue a security)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.883 0 Td
(clearance for Applicant. )Tj
9.883 0 Td
(Department Counsel appealed the Judge's)Tj
-28.766 -1.125 Td
(favorable decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual or legal)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.074 0 Td
(error. )Tj
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-21.074 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative Judge committed)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
41.073 0 Td
(factual or legal)Tj
-41.073 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp. 2-3 \(discussing reasons)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(why party must raise claims of error with specificity\).)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(Afr4)
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wId/(.?4$:Iƈ1}G]0~}n";0j$6,/@ioU[Iǹ5 AջOjS贙tGfhwP:OfpDכ (jWQyd({Dg%&qB\>DDq|N|UVdFȔ`^9=>w9L
.H` ,
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| TTWȦ\PH '1ETPTQ1"(7ZqEEDETܗnw[1ˈ =ttI9ֽ{Aߴi_<7dže@ ǭ5ۜ Nf ەQqbCh`aXĨq֫hvtdX)KfEvN