%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:17:02-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:02-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:02-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-06338.a1
uuid:137c4053-c9c7-46ce-acdf-b5032dbcf1ae
uuid:e7bfc8ac-b245-4dc2-9e61-bbea4ee7b962
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
14 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
[17 0 R 17 0 R]
endobj
17 0 obj
<><>]/P 15 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-06338.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-06338.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:17:02 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 5, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-06338)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-6.414 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
7.192 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr. issued a decision, dated May 16, \
2002, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to )Tj
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-36.515 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the issue of whether Applicant can augment t\
he record with evidence supportive of his case.)Tj
T*
(For the reasons set forth below, the )Tj
14.33 0 Td
(Board affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.702 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated September 17,)Tj
T*
(2001. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline )Tj
16.275 0 Td
(C \(Foreign Preference\) and Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\). )Tj
24.575 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-40.85 -1.125 Td
(submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he stated, "I wish to have a de\
cision without )Tj
35.041 0 Td
(a hearing." )Tj
(A File of Relevant)Tj
-35.041 -1.125 Td
(Material \(FORM\) was prepared, and a copy of the FORM was provided to A\
pplicant. )Tj
34.492 0 Td
(After Applicant's response to the)Tj
-34.492 -1.125 Td
(FORM )Tj
(was received, the case was assigned to the Administrative Judge for dete\
rmination. )Tj
36.519 0 Td
(The Administrative Judge)Tj
-36.519 -1.125 Td
(issued a written decision, dated May 16, 2002, in )Tj
19.885 0 Td
(which he concluded it is not clearly consistent with the national)Tj
-19.885 -1.125 Td
(interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
25.295 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on )Tj
12.912 0 Td
(Applicant's appeal from)Tj
-38.207 -1.125 Td
(the Judge's adverse security clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See )Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(e.g.)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(, ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-27.435 -1.125 Td
(pp. )Tj
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact are supported )Tj
21.425 0 Td
(by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
(?V%ox}m8u)
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq- (]9e{V29'ۥl$hͲE62N"8jÎ9(-͋:8m85f?(x9Nv_v] tKg_ G١Q~;/sy9+\l'ufD&2Z5+QOIsL!7__d(#!.U-&*# ܪ>\i1ÀlTa_ Ƃ2
endstream
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H| Xz<`vfえx3$@^9DE%&*FTEx"x*xb\¾}kf
@~ծCUˬ>c/ md7ج30( â'F49 I}"BN^<
ۇ GTL\|Z l
q 븈9l5Bc"b'ǎgu<|
`Cvz؈ح-e kD1
xRPDPP
?g_Z-G--1ڷȟqqQKRL jQWAFvN84mּ=G-[n֫w>;vҵ[w=?ջO~? "0|?A!!04,<"rX#cF3v\O'O/LM3g%NN37u^-^4}rXr5k߰Ѱimvٻoց윃=z,xN9{"X|נtX$ڀUQ
Rm'w
4i5`B;!X%$cב]]nSV=ˮr?y