%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:17:15-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:15-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:15-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-06776.a2
uuid:96d21a38-2c0d-4b98-8ae9-8d244e6225d9
uuid:684c31b3-61cb-42de-8b74-4a291036cc3a
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[19 0 R 19 0 R]
endobj
19 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 17 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-06776.a2)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-06776.a2.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:17:15 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: July 24, 2003)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(----------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-06776)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Applicant has appealed the March 31, 2003 remand decision of Administrat\
ive Judge Richard A. Cefola, in which the)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Judge concluded it is not clearly)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
13.163 0 Td
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
-13.163 -1.125 Td
(Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the acti\
ons of the Administrative Judge and Department)Tj
T*
(Counsel denied Applicant his rights)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.582 0 Td
(under federal law; and \(2\) whether the Administrative Judge's adverse \
remand)Tj
-14.582 -1.125 Td
(decision is arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
20.687 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.22 0 Td
(the Board affirms the Administrative)Tj
-31.908 -1.125 Td
(Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated February 26,)Tj
T*
(2002. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline J)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.915 0 Td
(\(Criminal Conduct\) and Guideline F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
-16.915 -2.125 Td
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he requested an admin\
istrative determination be made in his case.)Tj
T*
(A File of Relevant Material \(FORM\))Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.053 0 Td
(was prepared. )Tj
(A copy of the FORM was given to Applicant, who submitted a)Tj
-15.053 -1.125 Td
(response to the FORM. )Tj
(The Administrative Judge issued a decision, dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
29.912 0 Td
(November 13, 2002 \("decision"\), in which he)Tj
-29.912 -1.125 Td
(entered formal findings for Applicant with respect to Guideline J, but a\
gainst Applicant with respect to Guideline)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
45.599 0 Td
(F.)Tj
-45.599 -2.125 Td
(Applicant appealed the November 13, 2002 decision. )Tj
21.521 0 Td
(On March 13, 2003 the Board issued a Decision and Remand)Tj
-21.521 -1.125 Td
(Order \("remand order"\) and sent the case)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
16.67 0 Td
(back to the Administrative Judge with instructions concerning two docume\
nts)Tj
-16.67 -1.125 Td
(that were referenced in Applicant's response to the FORM but were sent t\
o the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
31.615 0 Td
(Board by an employee of Department)Tj
-31.615 -1.125 Td
(Counsel rather than appearing in the case file.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The Administrative Judge issued a Decision on Remand \("remand decision"\
\), dated March 31, 2003. )Tj
40.557 0 Td
(In the remand)Tj
-40.557 -1.125 Td
(decision, the Judge: \(a\) concluded the two)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.106 0 Td
(documents referenced in Applicant's response to the FORM were originally\
)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(part of that response and should be considered as part of the record evi\
dence in the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
33.321 0 Td
(case; \(b\) made findings of fact and)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
(E71t)
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cqb>Xpl%3,qC~]:OHvϝ5{p:֠eQ[3N~["Ν%6]p[`uFmAH^3ϲC)ov _gӸx0H;!YF2_\Tèe`NUEpTD|n2#L.s^c@ǂ@tد fz
endstream
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H|Xϙsgw(m݅Yk{ 1K>c" ETPTb#*ł%X.bEE
žucasA/wg3{ *A<~Ӥ{'Vn!a1Tl
~ F+,M+8V*qՙB~͒ Fz}yc礼#$@{PU ǏbBV|Ei<_?,4&N< e笖W mp~ȈVs