%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:17:43-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:43-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:43-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-07360.a1
uuid:3ae8cc42-2452-4926-9b1d-1767a43970bc
uuid:86fe6b63-5f78-42ff-8ddb-6af97c174b8b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
22 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[21 0 R 21 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
<><><><><><><><>]/P 19 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-07360.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-07360.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:17:43 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: April 10, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(-------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-07360)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Elizabeth M. Matchinski issued a decision, dated De\
cember 10, 2001, in which she concluded it is)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(not clearly consistent with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.775 0 Td
(the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for Appl\
icant. )Tj
30.238 0 Td
(Applicant)Tj
-41.013 -1.125 Td
(appealed. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(For the reasons set forth below, the Board)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
17.024 0 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
-21.077 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2,)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(1992, as amended.)Tj
-11.662 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether Applican\
t was denied a prompt adjudication of his case;)Tj
T*
(\(2\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.358 0 Td
(Administrative Judge was biased; and \(3\) whether the Administrative Ju\
dge made various factual or)Tj
-6.358 -1.125 Td
(legal errors.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated April 16, 2001.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Guideline E \(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
22.885 0 Td
(A hearing was held on September 28, 2001. )Tj
17.774 0 Td
(The)Tj
-40.659 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
21.606 0 Td
(December 10, 2001, in which she concluded it is not clearly)Tj
-21.606 -1.125 Td
(consistent with the national interest to grant or continue a security cl\
earance for)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.072 0 Td
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The case is before the Board)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(on Applicant's appeal from the Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
11.662 0 Td
(there is factual or legal error. )Tj
11.855 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
20.91 0 Td
(identify how the Administrative Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-20.91 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
/Span<>> BDC
3.582 0 Td
( )Tj
EMC
(ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp. 2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with s\
pecificity\).)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(When an Administrative Judge's factual findings are challenged, the Boar\
d must determine whether "[t]he)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Administrative Judge's findings of fact)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.761 0 Td
(are supported by such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accep\
t as)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 38.25 Tm
(adequate to support a conclusion in light of all the contrary)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
23.854 0 Td
(evidence. )Tj
4.053 0 Td
(In making this review, the Appeal Board shall)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
29 0 obj
(3^1Iaupjt\na)
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
40 0 obj
<>
endobj
41 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CR =@j+]`q~$K+ccw?kW}:W*U:ӪZϟ84%C\3ׁO'"LcLF(12H>`.K2|=Ѓ<3ӣTG&C̵PZeUJfE6AS=G
w
` E
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
<>stream
H|XTgwQ`ٽņ1
y%Q)[bDEPĎƂuł"b^v]bE/97wΜ3ww9Z!4oU(7GG$d .["$j9+ \- b>^2Cqc=
@ z8q!;{z|k8'6>q\j+<7"2vӟO#%/` <_;<">i<&&hs?=w 67'@@3@I\*C3T}/ʂ
EAId-pMgZ[^:_Z@#^ğ»|ssx_^L9;&1QR9ըY˹G^7hZGQ&M}EVmCN?ҵ[˯z?o_?80,<EFE2tX\ #GNiq'I:5y)3SfN1w-\-_2k5k7lظi3mٚ-gvݻ/o)8ZxŧN9{_xpt\
<; &h~VK)f*:GY-"6b8G<.>_6dJs{Ƚ~ GyK./FJFiGjӵ˴r@T]nn^;ku>B-xxPx(^JCGiV8%IIVRY|eE١)BrN<
;wD~~]
:C!`VOk5Rm٪L N/dJi
PsfbK!gs\
CP]M&KBrO9=09I#W1Dm6s ].Y+POy!\UAB?pPM8s88DiR9-8[vC5Jk`wUO#]!55J2!!a %ʸ/[Pf}{K[KSK3KSKcK#Ex,J7.2/26wJ=#a