%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:17:50-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:50-04:00
2021-07-02T14:17:50-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-07657.a1
uuid:fd5b6257-d9d2-4a61-8f5a-fabdab3560b6
uuid:771e7065-3d07-419f-b622-b5a547ee01da
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
23 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[20 0 R 20 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
<><><><><><>]/P 18 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-07657.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-07657.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:17:50 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: August 29, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(------------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-07657)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
11.641 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION AND REVERSAL ORDER)Tj
8.793 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.609 -2.2 Td
(Matthew E. Malone, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.387 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Roger C. Wesley issued a decision, dated February 2\
6, 2002, in which he concluded it is clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to )Tj
15.441 0 Td
(grant or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
21.074 0 Td
(Department Counsel)Tj
-36.515 -1.125 Td
(appealed.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Department Counsel's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether\
the Administrative Judge erred in applying)Tj
T*
(certain Financial Considerations mitigating )Tj
17.552 0 Td
(conditions; and \(2\) whether the Judge's conclusions in favor of Applic\
ant are)Tj
-17.552 -1.125 Td
(arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law. )Tj
16.188 0 Td
(For the reasons that follow, the Board )Tj
15.386 0 Td
(reverses the Administrative Judge's)Tj
-31.574 -1.125 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.032 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated October 6, 2001.)Tj
T*
(The SOR was based on Guideline F )Tj
14.582 0 Td
(\(Financial Considerations\). )Tj
11.137 0 Td
(A hearing was held on January 15, 2002. )Tj
16.607 0 Td
(The)Tj
-42.326 -1.125 Td
(Administrative Judge issued a written decision, dated February 26, 2002,\
in which he )Tj
34.382 0 Td
(concluded it is clearly consistent)Tj
-34.382 -1.125 Td
(with the national interest to grant or continue a security clearance for\
Applicant.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(The case is before the Board on Department Counsel's appeal from the Adm\
inistrative Judge's favorable security)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(clearance decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
-31.016 -1.125 Td
(pp. )Tj
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
(ziXE>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
<>
endobj
38 0 obj
<>
endobj
39 0 obj
<>stream
H\j >wId/(.?4$:Iƈ1}G]0~}n";0j$6,/@ioU[Iǹ5 AջOjS贙tGfhwP:OfpDכ (jWQyd({Dg%&qB\>DDq|N|UVdFȔ`^9=>w9L
.H` ,
endstream
endobj
40 0 obj
<>stream
H| TnC*)@74`L"YDE%Aw4.1(("*n/3AwI9u߹/@ @MUr[hxlX\ 5|\Z#g5 veT%t3!j$ y?/h z|c(3x*:bF x46,!y1sX#b#8@7jlI1q[yP utAW>
Zߟ2!JpBQD"v-0W|Ti5}Vʫ h5Sx.acn6X 5$&J*:uwptrviխQ&M=dF>iּEV۴mާCGNtǧ={~e7waЏ?
!QC
;rT1c7>aIL25qI3gN:w^-^tYr5k߰1Kisںmvٻ/w9ZxxJN9{|)\xMVY9$ڂ
LA
ȓh}1wT5/ AOdy\$_
s\PVWԕT&:ihkemsmKm?m6St(J]AqQܔJ)1J$+sEZeKS"r^]}
i#d::|LMLmMmLML-MML:7o*_Zl]Y*@YuܵltYږy~.F_Qklbt1ᙡ`2<0ܵe(6raa!e4;֜2(7,Ѝ
ZjvmV+ׁ# @l(F#O9a{:>;8!eBUT٪B U
{vV;>J=-0O)y?kuzp! f
Oa)