%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:18:56-04:00
2021-07-02T14:18:56-04:00
2021-07-02T14:18:56-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-09781.a1
uuid:8d1b1bcf-41aa-4c7c-a018-1009be3d0bd4
uuid:a2195659-99c6-4ea0-a9ed-51396ee3d05b
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
15 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<>
endobj
17 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
21 0 obj
[18 0 R 18 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj
<><><><>]/P 16 0 R/Pg 12 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-09781.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-09781.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:18:56 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: September 25, 2002)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-09781)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-7.539 -2.2 Td
(Peregrine D. Russell-Hunter, Esq., Chief Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
8.317 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(Administrative Judge Joseph Testan issued a decision, dated June 25, 200\
2, in which he concluded it is not clearly)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(consistent with the national interest to grant )Tj
17.746 0 Td
(or continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
18.769 0 Td
(Applicant appealed.)Tj
-36.515 -2.125 Td
(This Board has jurisdiction on appeal under Executive Order 10865 and De\
partment of Defense Directive 5220.6)Tj
T*
(\(Directive\), dated January 2, 1992, as )Tj
15.245 0 Td
(amended.)Tj
-15.245 -2.125 Td
(Applicant's appeal presents the following issues: \(1\) whether the Admi\
nistrative Judge erred by finding Applicant still)Tj
T*
(owed certain debts; and \(2\) whether the )Tj
16.077 0 Td
(Administrative Judge failed to apply the whole person concept to Applica\
nt's)Tj
-16.077 -1.125 Td
(case. )Tj
(For the reasons that follow, the Board affirms the Administrative Judge'\
s )Tj
31.617 0 Td
(decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
-11.585 -2.125 Td
(Procedural History)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.032 -2.125 Td
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals issued to Applicant a Stateme\
nt of Reasons \(SOR\) dated November 26,)Tj
T*
(2001. )Tj
(The SOR was based on Guideline )Tj
16.275 0 Td
(F \(Financial Considerations\).)Tj
-16.275 -2.125 Td
(Applicant submitted an answer to the SOR, in which he stated "I prefer t\
o have a decision without a hearing." )Tj
44.083 0 Td
(A File of)Tj
-44.083 -1.125 Td
(Relevant Material \(FORM\) was )Tj
12.997 0 Td
(prepared, and Applicant was given a copy of the FORM. )Tj
22.938 0 Td
(After Applicant submitted a)Tj
-35.936 -1.125 Td
(response to the FORM, the case was assigned to the Administrative )Tj
27.273 0 Td
(Judge for determination.)Tj
-27.273 -2.125 Td
(The Administrative Judge issued a decision, dated June 25, 2002, in whic\
h he concluded it is not clearly consistent with)Tj
T*
(the national interest to grant or )Tj
12.552 0 Td
(continue a security clearance for Applicant. )Tj
17.686 0 Td
(The case is before the Board on Applicant's)Tj
-30.238 -1.125 Td
(appeal from the Judge's adverse decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine whether there is factual )Tj
17.798 0 Td
(or legal error. )Tj
5.719 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with specificity and identify how the A\
dministrative )Tj
33.963 0 Td
(Judge committed factual or legal)Tj
-33.963 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
27.435 0 Td
(See, e.g.,)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
3.582 0 Td
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at)Tj
ET
q
10 36 592 730 re
W n
BT
12 0 0 12 16 39.75 Tm
(pp. )Tj
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with speci\
ficity\).)Tj
ET
EMC
Q
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<>
endobj
24 0 obj
(l!j1QmWcL)
endobj
25 0 obj
<>
endobj
26 0 obj
<>
endobj
27 0 obj
<>
endobj
28 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
36 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
Cq5 (Y9 t1{OK3$!K;=w7=(|sWmX^w/2N~]