%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<>
endobj
2 0 obj
<>stream
2021-07-02T14:19:26-04:00
2021-07-02T14:19:26-04:00
2021-07-02T14:19:26-04:00
Adobe Acrobat 17.0
application/pdf
01-10349.a1
uuid:7fb2ff77-42cd-4ded-9479-7ae0ba8ee5e3
uuid:9733043e-fb44-43d9-9de6-a85a5cb025b8
Acrobat Web Capture 15.0
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<>
endobj
6 0 obj
<>
endobj
3 0 obj
<>
endobj
7 0 obj
<>
endobj
8 0 obj
<>
endobj
19 0 obj
<>>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<>
endobj
21 0 obj
<>
endobj
23 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
25 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
27 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj
[22 0 R 22 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj
<><><><><><><><><><>]/P 20 0 R/Pg 13 0 R/S/Article>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/Artifact <>BDC
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 5 779 Tm
(01-10349.a1)Tj
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
0 -86 TD
(file:///usr.osd.mil/)Tj
7.166 0 Td
(...)Tj
(yComputer/Desktop/DOHA%20transfer/DOHA-Kane/dodogc/doha/industrial/Archi\
ved%20-%20HTML/01-10349.a1.html)Tj
50.24 0 Td
([7/2/2021 2:19:26 PM])Tj
EMC
ET
1 g
10 36 591.75 729.75 re
f
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 734.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 733.5 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 732.7503 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.75 l
0 1.499 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 733.5 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 618.75 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.75 l
579 -0.75 l
579.749 0 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.7499 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
-0.75 -0.751 l
579 -0.751 l
578.25 0 l
h
f
Q
0.604 g
q 1 0 0 1 16.0002 617.2497 cm
0 0 m
0.75 0.751 l
0 1.5 l
h
f
Q
0.933 g
q 1 0 0 1 594.9999 618.0003 cm
0 0 m
0.75 -0.751 l
0.75 0.75 l
h
f
Q
/Article <>BDC
EMC
/Article <>BDC
BT
0 g
12 0 0 12 16 749.25 Tm
(DATE: February 15, 2005)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(In Re:)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(--------------)Tj
T*
(SSN: -----------)Tj
T*
(Applicant for Security Clearance)Tj
0 -3.25 TD
(ISCR Case No. 01-10349)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
17.628 -2.125 Td
(APPEAL BOARD DECISION)Tj
2.806 -2.125 Td
(APPEARANCES)Tj
ET
0.75 w
q 1 0 0 1 261.2061 543 cm
0 0 m
89.338 0 l
h
S
Q
BT
11.25 0 0 11.25 251.0312 519 Tm
(FOR GOVERNMENT)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-4.303 -2.2 Td
(Francisco Mendez, Esq., Department Counsel)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
5.081 -2.2 Td
(FOR APPLICANT)Tj
/TT2 1 Tf
2.722 -2.2 Td
(Pro Se)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 16 419.25 Tm
(The Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals \(DOHA\) issued to Applicant \
a Statement of Reasons \(SOR\), dated March)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(25, 2003, which)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(stated the reasons why DOHA proposed to deny or revoke access to classif\
ied information for)Tj
T*
(Applicant. )Tj
4.443 0 Td
(The SOR was based on Guideline C)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.692 0 Td
(\(Foreign Preference\), Guideline B \(Foreign Influence\), and Guideline\
E)Tj
-19.136 -1.125 Td
(\(Personal Conduct\). )Tj
8.249 0 Td
(Administrative Judge John G. Metz, Jr., issued)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
18.97 0 Td
(an unfavorable security clearance decision, dated)Tj
-27.219 -1.125 Td
(July 1, 2004.)Tj
0 -2.125 TD
(Applicant appealed the Administrative Judge's unfavorable decision. )Tj
27.728 0 Td
(The Board has jurisdiction under Executive Order)Tj
-27.728 -1.125 Td
(10865 and)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(Department of Defense Directive 5220.6 \(Directive\), dated January 2, 1\
992, as amended.)Tj
T*
(The following issues have been raised on appeal: \(1\) whether the Admin\
istrative Judge demonstrated bias against)Tj
0 -1.125 TD
(Applicant; \(2\) whether the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
10.83 0 Td
(Administrative Judge erred by concluding the record evidence showed Appl\
icant has a)Tj
-10.83 -1.125 Td
(foreign preference under Guideline C; and \(3\) whether)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.102 0 Td
(the Administrative Judge erred by concluding the record)Tj
-22.102 -1.125 Td
(evidence shows Applicant is vulnerable to foreign influence under Guidel\
ine B. )Tj
32.157 0 Td
(For)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
(the reasons that follow, the Board)Tj
-32.157 -1.125 Td
(affirms the Administrative Judge's decision.)Tj
/TT1 1 Tf
20.685 -2.125 Td
(Scope of Review)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
-20.685 -2.125 Td
(On appeal, the Board does not review a case )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
17.993 0 Td
(de novo)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
(. )Tj
(Rather, the Board addresses the material issues raised by the)Tj
-17.993 -1.125 Td
(parties to determine)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
8.191 0 Td
(whether there is factual or legal error. )Tj
15.326 0 Td
(There is no presumption of error below, and the appealing)Tj
-23.517 -1.125 Td
(party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
14.801 0 Td
(specificity and identify how the Administrative Judge committed factual \
or legal)Tj
-14.801 -1.125 Td
(error. )Tj
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
22.186 0 Td
(E3.1.32. )Tj
/TT3 1 Tf
(See also)Tj
/TT0 1 Tf
( ISCR Case No. 00-0050 \(July 23, 2001\) at pp.)Tj
-22.186 -1.125 Td
(2-3 \(discussing reasons why party must raise claims of error with)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
26.355 0 Td
(specificity\).)Tj
-26.355 -2.125 Td
(When the rulings or conclusions of an Administrative Judge are challenge\
d, the Board must consider whether they are:)Tj
T*
(\(1\) arbitrary or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
6.191 0 Td
(capricious; or \(2\) contrary to law. )Tj
13.689 0 Td
(Directive, Additional Procedural Guidance, Item E3.1.32.3. )Tj
24.104 0 Td
(In)Tj
-43.985 -1.125 Td
(deciding whether the Judge's rulings or)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
15.899 0 Td
(conclusions are arbitrary or capricious, the Board will review the Judge\
's)Tj
-15.899 -1.125 Td
(decision to determine whether: it does not examine relevant)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
24.131 0 Td
(evidence; it fails to articulate a satisfactory explanation for)Tj
-24.131 -1.125 Td
(its conclusions, including a rational connection between the facts found\
and the)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
32.019 0 Td
(choice made; it does not consider)Tj
-32.019 -1.125 Td
(relevant factors; it reflects a clear error of judgment; it fails to con\
sider an important aspect of the case; it)Tj
/Span<>> BDC
( )Tj
EMC
42.316 0 Td
(offers an)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
30 0 obj
<>
endobj
31 0 obj
(E\r@?a#_\(wС)
endobj
32 0 obj
<>
endobj
33 0 obj
<>
endobj
34 0 obj
<>
endobj
35 0 obj
<>
endobj
42 0 obj
<>
endobj
43 0 obj
<>stream
H\j0~
CI6i9 t1NzOJ3$>[NXn= λpΫ]
}m ʷsH>hqg7\p0v
^CRB[(
pF/Mxmzdm*G4oH9tČEoii
f"*O9y@\
'q[q&1̒qia
*עլբլբլZX3a|>07Q,u5ga:xn\eRYfďa?F<`.MUR'{Z<7ܕ! S H
endstream
endobj
44 0 obj
<>stream
H|T=ClQ
{I4$D@+%&*FTV]cA슽+ؽ?5^>}oٳgͷ7@ ăUZ/+ȘY(p_9hY{~> \Fv]w\R[!Nm@Q]>h$.Jq}##*Ge &".4l,}"by(2hbXPza`p?T쪊u`_X0ק9jmT#ȷTD+*ʪPM,dAsuU
yrf.xNoK]-9(#%_&|xI~rF她+RXLQ
swMfr+VDRʔ)WBE_?lU\jYv7hبqp͚h٪uw"$|?wa5*[={7_48nП6|D_G%36q\R 'L2u3g͞/H]hҖXWYn6oٚmvػõY9zqs/\+6՜\RS
I_uSbV:*k؟Cx0$%DZCF
SǪI$z_}ӷߣ~#=zQ7Yݦ?ҟ~cKg(KeeUXKY=e孺5[Qp7`T3Fo#H0Tch0vqqٸ